• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种可解释的机器学习模型以预测脓毒症患者的院内死亡率:一项回顾性时间验证研究

Developing an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Temporal Validation Study.

作者信息

Li Shuhe, Dou Ruoxu, Song Xiaodong, Lui Ka Yin, Xu Jinghong, Guo Zilu, Hu Xiaoguang, Guan Xiangdong, Cai Changjie

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 24;12(3):915. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030915.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12030915
PMID:36769564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9917524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification plays an essential role in the decision making for sepsis management, as existing approaches can hardly satisfy the need to assess this heterogeneous population. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis.

METHODS

Adult patients fulfilling the definition of Sepsis-3 were included at a large tertiary medical center. Relevant clinical features were extracted within the first 24 h in ICU, re-classified into different genres, and utilized for model development under three strategies: "Basic + Lab", "Basic + Intervention", and "Whole" feature sets. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared with logistic regression (LR) and established severity scores. Temporal validation was conducted using admissions from 2017 to 2019.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 24,272 patients, of which 4013 patients formed the test cohort for temporal validation. The trained and fine-tuned XGBoost model with the whole feature set showed the best discriminatory ability in the test cohort with AUROC as 0.85, significantly higher than the XGBoost "Basic + Lab" model (0.83), the LR "Whole" model (0.82), SOFA (0.63), SAPS-II (0.73), and LODS score (0.74). The performance in varying subgroups remained robust, and predictors, such as increased urine output and supplemental oxygen therapy, were crucially correlated with improved survival when interpretability was explored.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a novel XGBoost-based model and demonstrated significantly improved performance to LR and other scores in predicting the mortality risks of sepsis patients in the hospital using features in the first 24 h.

摘要

背景

风险分层在脓毒症管理决策中起着至关重要的作用,因为现有方法难以满足评估这一异质性群体的需求。我们旨在开发并验证一种机器学习模型,以预测重症脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。

方法

在一家大型三级医疗中心纳入符合Sepsis-3定义的成年患者。在重症监护病房(ICU)的最初24小时内提取相关临床特征,重新分类为不同类别,并在三种策略下用于模型开发:“基础+实验室”、“基础+干预”和“全部”特征集。将极端梯度提升(XGBoost)与逻辑回归(LR)及既定的严重程度评分进行比较。使用2017年至2019年的入院病例进行时间验证。

结果

最终队列包括24272例患者,其中4013例患者构成用于时间验证的测试队列。经过训练和微调的具有全部特征集的XGBoost模型在测试队列中显示出最佳的辨别能力,曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.85,显著高于XGBoost“基础+实验室”模型(0.83)、LR“全部特征”模型(0.82)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)(0.63)、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS-II)(0.73)和逻辑器官功能障碍评分(LODS)(0.74)。在不同亚组中的表现保持稳健,并且在探索可解释性时,诸如尿量增加和补充氧气治疗等预测因素与生存率改善密切相关。

结论

我们开发并验证了一种基于XGBoost的新型模型,并证明在使用最初24小时内的特征预测脓毒症患者的院内死亡风险方面,其性能显著优于LR和其他评分系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/b4fbb13350e3/jcm-12-00915-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/883cc13684df/jcm-12-00915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/50e4dba72df8/jcm-12-00915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/8d95ea185486/jcm-12-00915-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/e0b35ea9d751/jcm-12-00915-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/b4fbb13350e3/jcm-12-00915-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/883cc13684df/jcm-12-00915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/50e4dba72df8/jcm-12-00915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/8d95ea185486/jcm-12-00915-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/e0b35ea9d751/jcm-12-00915-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2f/9917524/b4fbb13350e3/jcm-12-00915-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Temporal Validation Study.开发一种可解释的机器学习模型以预测脓毒症患者的院内死亡率:一项回顾性时间验证研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 24;12(3):915. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030915.
2
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Real-Time Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤重症患者实时死亡率预测机器学习模型的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 15;9:853102. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.853102. eCollection 2022.
3
Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study.用于脓毒症预后早期预测的可解释机器学习:一项发现与验证研究。
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00628-6. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
4
Early sepsis mortality prediction model based on interpretable machine learning approach: development and validation study.基于可解释机器学习方法的早期脓毒症死亡率预测模型:开发与验证研究
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):909-918. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03732-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Machine learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis.机器学习在脓毒症患者急性肾损伤预测中的应用。
J Transl Med. 2022 May 13;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03364-0.
6
Evaluate prognostic accuracy of SOFA component score for mortality among adults with sepsis by machine learning method.采用机器学习方法评估 SOFA 评分对脓毒症成人死亡率的预后准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08045-x.
7
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
8
A time-incorporated SOFA score-based machine learning model for predicting mortality in critically ill patients: A multicenter, real-world study.一种基于时间整合的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的机器学习模型用于预测危重症患者的死亡率:一项多中心、真实世界研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jul;163:104776. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104776. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Interpretable Machine Learning to Optimize Early In-Hospital Mortality Prediction for Elderly Patients with Sepsis: A Discovery Study.可解释机器学习优化老年脓毒症患者早期住院死亡率预测:一项探索性研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Dec 15;2022:4820464. doi: 10.1155/2022/4820464. eCollection 2022.
10
Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.利用可解释机器学习模型预测重症监护病房心力衰竭患者的死亡率:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e38082. doi: 10.2196/38082.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of a risk model for short-term mortality in ICU sepsis patients based on conventional indicators: A prospective cohort study.基于传统指标构建ICU脓毒症患者短期死亡率风险模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e42950. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042950.
2
The Prognostic Value of the CALLY Index in Sepsis: A Composite Biomarker Reflecting Inflammation, Nutrition, and Immunity.CALLY指数在脓毒症中的预后价值:一种反映炎症、营养和免疫的复合生物标志物
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;15(8):1026. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081026.
3
Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for maxillary sinus cysts and exploration of clustering patterns.

本文引用的文献

1
Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study.用于脓毒症预后早期预测的可解释机器学习:一项发现与验证研究。
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00628-6. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
2
Development of a new score for early mortality prediction in trauma ICU patients: RETRASCORE.创伤 ICU 患者早期死亡预测新评分的制定:RETRASCORE。
Crit Care. 2021 Dec 7;25(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03845-6.
3
External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?
基于机器学习的上颌窦囊肿预测模型的开发及聚类模式探索。
Head Face Med. 2025 Mar 12;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00492-y.
4
aCCI-HBV-ACLF: A Novel Predictive Model for Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.aCCI-HBV-ACLF:一种用于乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭的新型预测模型。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jan;61(2):286-298. doi: 10.1111/apt.18347. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis.脓毒症患者死亡率预测的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jul 8;7:1348907. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1348907. eCollection 2024.
6
A generalizable and interpretable model for mortality risk stratification of sepsis patients in intensive care unit.一种可推广且可解释的 ICU 脓毒症患者死亡率风险分层模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02279-0.
预后模型的外部验证:是什么、为什么、如何、何时以及何地?
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa188. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Mortality Prediction in Cerebral Hemorrhage Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Intensive Care Units.在重症监护病房使用机器学习算法预测脑出血患者的死亡率
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 20;11:610531. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.610531. eCollection 2020.
5
Dynamic survival prediction in intensive care units from heterogeneous time series without the need for variable selection or curation.无需变量选择或编辑,从异质时间序列中进行 ICU 动态生存预测。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22129. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79142-z.
6
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
7
A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Patients With Postoperative Sepsis.基于机器学习的术后脓毒症患者医院死亡率预测
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 11;7:445. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00445. eCollection 2020.
8
Interpretable clinical prediction via attention-based neural network.基于注意力的神经网络的可解释临床预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 9;20(Suppl 3):131. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1110-7.
9
Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal.脓毒症的生物标志物:重新评估的时候到了。
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 5;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02993-5.
10
The Uncertain Science of Predicting Death.预测死亡的不确定性科学
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e201736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1736.