Barratt Alice, Welbergen Justin, Moore Ben, Turbill Christopher
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Science Rd, Richmond NSW 2753, Australia.
School of Science, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury campus, Richmond NSW 2753, Australia.
Behav Ecol. 2025 Jun 11;36(4):araf069. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araf069. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
Animal decisions trade-off the mortality risks of starvation and predation, and anti-predator behaviors generally incur a cost of reduced energy intake. Torpor and shallow rest-phase heterothermy are widespread physiological responses to starvation risk among small mammals and birds. Here, we present a field-based experimental test of the hypothesis that energy savings from torpor use can also reduce predation risk by moderating the energy cost of anti-predator behavioral responses in a small bird during winter. We manipulated perceived predation risk in wild populations of the superb fairy-wren () by playback of conspecific alarm calls during the daytime active-phase and tested for effects on body temperature measured continuously by telemetry during the nocturnal rest-phase. We found that alarm call playback was associated with subsequent rest-phase torpor bouts that were significantly deeper (minimum skin temperature: 28.7 ± 1.7 °C vs. 30.0 ± 1.5 °C) and longer (duration in torpor: 6.0 ± 2.7 h vs. 3.8 ± 2.3 h) compared to control periods. By demonstrating the connection between resting energy expenditure and energy costs of behavioral decisions during activity, our study has implications for understanding both the ecological functions of torpor and survival consequences of behavioral responses by small birds to environmental challenges.
动物的决策会权衡饥饿和被捕食的死亡风险,而反捕食行为通常会带来能量摄入减少的代价。蛰伏和浅度休息期异温性是小型哺乳动物和鸟类应对饥饿风险普遍存在的生理反应。在此,我们针对以下假设进行了一项基于野外的实验测试:在冬季,小型鸟类通过蛰伏节省的能量,也可以通过降低反捕食行为反应的能量消耗来降低被捕食风险。我们通过在白天活跃期播放同种警报叫声,来操控华丽细尾鹩莺()野生种群所感知到的捕食风险,并测试其对夜间休息期通过遥测连续测量的体温的影响。我们发现,与对照期相比,播放警报叫声与随后休息期的蛰伏发作有关,蛰伏程度明显更深(最低皮肤温度:28.7 ± 1.7℃ 对 30.0 ± 1.5℃)且持续时间更长(蛰伏持续时间:6.0 ± 2.7小时 对 3.8 ± 2.3小时)。通过证明静息能量消耗与活动期间行为决策的能量成本之间的联系,我们的研究对于理解蛰伏的生态功能以及小型鸟类行为反应对环境挑战的生存后果具有启示意义。