Champney Thomas H, Smith Heather F, Hildebrandt Sabine, Cornwall Jon
Department of Cell Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Department of Anatomy, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, USA.
Am J Biol Anthropol. 2025 Jul;187(3):e70085. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.70085.
Ethical considerations around research and education with modern human subjects, use of human tissue, and studies involving humans are ubiquitous within the global scientific community. This commentary explores considerations around how and whether these types of ethical considerations may apply to hominin fossils. While some might propose that the age of a fossil could be the basis for decisions around their ethical handling, it may be that characteristics or behaviors of the hominins are a more appropriate measure to determine their ethical status. These types of ethical considerations have recently been examined in other historical human tissues, such as mummies and ancient DNA, with these ethical explorations being driven by a recognition of evolving ethical perspectives around the world. Thus, there is both the precedent and stimulus for the paleoanthropology community to revisit current ethical practices within the profession. Doing so would help identify and establish standards that are reflective of global perspectives around the contemporary ethical management of hominin fossils, and potentially assist in aligning these practices with other disciplines that work with both hominin fossils and human tissues.
在全球科学界,围绕现代人类受试者的研究与教育、人类组织的使用以及涉及人类的研究的伦理考量无处不在。本评论探讨了这些伦理考量如何以及是否适用于古人类化石。虽然有些人可能认为化石的年代可以作为决定其伦理处理方式的依据,但也许古人类的特征或行为是确定其伦理地位的更合适标准。最近在其他历史人类组织,如木乃伊和古代DNA中也对这类伦理考量进行了研究,这些伦理探索是由全球不断演变的伦理观念所推动的。因此,古人类学领域有先例和动力重新审视该行业目前的伦理实践。这样做将有助于确定并建立反映全球对古人类化石当代伦理管理观点的标准,并有可能协助使这些实践与其他同时处理古人类化石和人类组织的学科保持一致。