Suppr超能文献

产品属性与口腔尼古丁袋(ONP)偏好之间的关联——来自在线商店的证据。

The Association Between Product Attributes and Oral Nicotine Pouch (ONP) Preference - Evidence from Online Stores.

作者信息

Hardin Andrew, Ahn Sooa, Ma Shaoying, Thai Veronica, Berman Micah, Mays Darren, Chen Jian, Paskett Electra D, Wagener Theodore L, Shang Ce

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.

Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf137.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have steadily gained popularity since first appearing in the U.S. market during 2014, but research on how their features are associated with consumer preference remains limited. We examined how ONP characteristics, including prices, flavors, pouches per can, nicotine concentration, and ingredient claims, are associated with online ratings (1-5 stars), which measured consumer preferences in our analysis.

METHODS

Data on 1689 unique ONPs from 19 brands that received reviews were scraped from 4 online stores that shipped to the US, and we used ordinary least squares regressions to estimate associations between product features and ratings.

RESULTS

On average, products cost $0.20/pouch and contained 19 pouches/can. Nearly half (46%) had 5 to <10 mg nicotine/pouch. The most common flavors were "fruit/sweet" (33%), "mint" (25%) and "wintergreen" (13%), while 21% of products had "ice/freeze" mentions. The brand on! accounted for 15% of products. Nicotine claims included "tobacco-free" (21%), "leaf-free" (26%), "synthetic" (8%), and multiple claims (20%). Product size was associated with lower ratings while mint flavor was associated with higher ratings (p<.05). Product characteristics were highly correlated with brands, and the negative association between price per pouch and ratings became insignificant after adjusting for brands.

CONCLUSIONS

More pouches per can are associated with lower ratings. Sales prices vary across ONP brands, which is related to how consumers rate more expensive products. Future research should investigate how restricting mint flavor, product size and certain brands may impact consumer preferences for ONPs and their subsequent use.

IMPLICATIONS

We provide novel evidence on how oral nicotine pouch (ONP) features are associated with consumer preferences, measured by online ratings (ranging from 1-5 stars). Larger product size (more pouches per can) is associated with lower consumer ratings while mint flavor is associated with higher ratings. Brands are strongly correlated with ratings, impacting how consumers rate more expensive products. Restricting mint flavor, product size and certain brands may influence consumer preferences for ONPs and their subsequent use, which should be investigated in future research.

摘要

引言

自2014年首次出现在美国市场以来,口服尼古丁袋(ONP)的受欢迎程度稳步上升,但关于其特性与消费者偏好之间关系的研究仍然有限。我们研究了ONP的特征,包括价格、口味、每罐袋数、尼古丁浓度和成分声明,如何与在线评分(1 - 5星)相关联,在我们的分析中,在线评分衡量了消费者偏好。

方法

从4家运往美国的在线商店中抓取了来自19个品牌的1689种独特ONP的评论数据,并使用普通最小二乘法回归来估计产品特征与评分之间的关联。

结果

平均而言,产品每袋成本为0.20美元,每罐包含19袋。近一半(46%)的产品每袋尼古丁含量为5至<10毫克。最常见的口味是“水果/甜味”(33%)、“薄荷味”(25%)和“冬青味”(13%),而21%的产品提到了“冰/冷冻”。on!品牌占产品的15%。尼古丁声明包括“无烟草”(21%)、“无烟叶”(26%)、“合成”(8%)和多种声明(20%)。产品尺寸与较低评分相关,而薄荷味与较高评分相关(p<0.05)。产品特征与品牌高度相关,在对品牌进行调整后,每袋价格与评分之间的负相关变得不显著。

结论

每罐袋数越多与评分越低相关。ONP品牌的销售价格各不相同,这与消费者对更昂贵产品的评分方式有关。未来的研究应调查限制薄荷味、产品尺寸和某些品牌如何影响消费者对ONP的偏好及其后续使用。

启示

我们提供了关于口服尼古丁袋(ONP)特征如何与消费者偏好相关联的新证据,通过在线评分(范围从1 - 5星)来衡量。较大的产品尺寸(每罐袋数更多)与较低的消费者评分相关,而薄荷味与较高评分相关。品牌与评分密切相关,影响消费者对更昂贵产品的评分方式。限制薄荷味、产品尺寸和某些品牌可能会影响消费者对ONP的偏好及其后续使用,这应在未来的研究中进行调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验