Ch Iftikhar Ali, Nasir Khurram, Majeed Uzair, Chaudhry Azhar, Abdullah Muhammad, Haider Ali, Jamal Asadullah, Hussain Anum, Iftikhar Hammad, Khalid Salman, Wu Pei-Tzu, Shah Yusuf, Niaz Arham, Siddique Muhammad, Tahirkheli Naeem
South Oklahoma Heart Research, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
SSM Health Saint Anthony Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jul;48(7):e70170. doi: 10.1002/clc.70170.
High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with chronic coronary artery disease, with reports suggesting improved clinical outcomes. However, recent findings in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients question whether a treat-to-target low density lipoprotein (LDL) approach is non-inferior to high-intensity statin therapy.
This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG only (n = 1854) procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into three groups based on statin prescription: high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg), low/moderate-intensity statin therapy, and a no-statin group. The primary outcome measured was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of post-CABG acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident and cardiovascular mortality.
No-Statin group had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to statin group (14.2% vs 8.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055-2.427, p = 0.029). Low/moderate-intensity therapy (n = 1301) was associated with a numerically higher overall rate of MACE compared to high-intensity therapy (n = 397) but was not statistically significant (9.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.45, CI 0.961-2.172, p = 0.073). Beyond 2 years post-CABG, low/moderate intensity statin use was associated with a significant higher incidence of MACE (9.1% vs 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993-2.978, p = 0.047) compared to high intensity statins. Patients who received high-intensity statin therapy had the lowest LDL levels (82.21 ± 41.85 mg/dL), compared to those on low/moderate-intensity statins (90.84 ± 45.89 mg/dL) and no-statin group (104.83 ± 38.93 mg/dL, p < 0.001).
High-intensity statin therapy following CABG is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to low- or moderate-intensity statin regimens.
对于慢性冠状动脉疾病患者,推荐使用高强度他汀类药物,有报告显示临床结局有所改善。然而,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者的近期研究结果对达标治疗低密度脂蛋白(LDL)方法是否不劣于高强度他汀类药物治疗提出了质疑。
这项单中心观察性研究分析了2013年至2015年间仅行CABG手术的所有患者(n = 1854例)。根据他汀类药物处方将患者分为三组:高强度他汀类药物治疗(阿托伐他汀≥40mg或瑞舒伐他汀≥20mg)、低/中等强度他汀类药物治疗和无他汀类药物组。所测量的主要结局是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),这是一个CABG术后急性冠状动脉综合征、脑血管意外和心血管死亡的综合指标。
与他汀类药物组相比,无他汀类药物组的MACE发生率显著更高(14.2%对8.9%;优势比(OR)1.60,95%置信区间(CI)1.055 - 2.427,p = 0.029)。与高强度治疗组(n = 397)相比,低/中等强度治疗组(n = 1301)的MACE总体发生率在数值上更高,但无统计学意义(9.6%对6.6%;OR 1.45,CI 0.961 - 2.172,p = 0.073)。在CABG术后2年以上,与高强度他汀类药物相比,低/中等强度他汀类药物的使用与MACE发生率显著更高相关(9.1%对5.3%;OR 1.72,95% CI 0.993 - 2.978,p = 0.047)。接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的患者的LDL水平最低(82.21±41.85mg/dL),相比之下,低/中等强度他汀类药物治疗组为(90.84±45.89mg/dL),无他汀类药物组为(104.83±38.93mg/dL,p < 0.001)。
与低强度或中等强度他汀类药物治疗方案相比,CABG术后进行高强度他汀类药物治疗与改善长期临床结局相关。