Choda Kezang, Sangkarak Sirirat, Maneekan Pannamas, Prangthip Pattaneeya, Ittisupornrat Suda, Eaktasang Numfon, Kittipongvises Suthirat, Lohwacharin Jenyuk, Phetrak Athit
Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04761-3.
Safe drinking water in schools is important for students' health. Despite the presence of water treatment systems in rural schools, systematic monitoring and evaluation of drinking water quality are often insufficiently integrated into risk assessment frameworks, potentially compromising student health. In this study, a cross-sectional survey was conducted using drinking water samples from rural primary schools along the Thai-Myanmar border in Kanchanaburi, Thailand, aiming to evaluate the quality of drinking water in terms of physicochemical and bacteriological parameters and assess the health risks to students. A total of 52 drinking water samples were collected for water quality analysis. Among these, approximately 42% (n = 22) of these collected samples did not comply with Thailand's recommended limits of drinking water quality. Among the noncompliant samples, total coliform bacteria were detected in 59% (n = 13), fluoride concentrations exceeded the permissible limit of 0.70 mg/L in 18% (n = 4), and arsenic levels surpassed the recommended limit of 10 µg/L in 9% (n = 2). These contaminants may pose a potential health risk to students. Health risk assessments indicated that, although the majority of hazard index (HI) and cancer risk (CR) values were within acceptable limits (HI < 1; CR between 1 × 10⁻ and 1 × 10⁻), the 95th percentile values exceeded these thresholds, suggesting potential health risks for students consuming the contaminated water. To mitigate health risks associated with contaminated drinking water in rural primary schools, the implementation of effective water treatment systems, coupled with routine monitoring of drinking water quality and proper maintenance, is recommended. However, this study has some limitations, including a restricted geographic coverage and reliance on generalized exposure parameters, which constrain causal inferences between contaminant exposure and health outcomes. Future research should expand the study area and incorporate region-specific behavioral data to more comprehensively assess chronic exposure risks and the effectiveness of intervention strategies.
学校的安全饮用水对学生健康至关重要。尽管农村学校设有水处理系统,但饮用水质量的系统监测和评估往往未充分纳入风险评估框架,这可能会危及学生健康。在本研究中,我们对泰国北碧府泰缅边境沿线农村小学的饮用水样本进行了横断面调查,旨在从物理化学和细菌学参数方面评估饮用水质量,并评估对学生的健康风险。共采集了52份饮用水样本进行水质分析。其中,约42%(n = 22)的采集样本不符合泰国饮用水质量推荐标准。在不符合标准的样本中,59%(n = 13)检测到总大肠菌群,18%(n = 4)的氟化物浓度超过了0.70毫克/升的允许限值,9%(n = 2)的砷含量超过了10微克/升的推荐限值。这些污染物可能会对学生构成潜在的健康风险。健康风险评估表明,尽管大多数危害指数(HI)和癌症风险(CR)值在可接受范围内(HI < 1;CR在1×10⁻⁶和1×10⁻⁴之间),但第95百分位数超过了这些阈值,这表明饮用受污染水的学生存在潜在健康风险。为降低农村小学受污染饮用水带来的健康风险,建议实施有效的水处理系统,并对饮用水质量进行常规监测和妥善维护。然而,本研究存在一些局限性,包括地理覆盖范围有限以及依赖通用暴露参数,这限制了污染物暴露与健康结果之间的因果推断。未来的研究应扩大研究区域,并纳入特定区域的行为数据,以更全面地评估慢性暴露风险和干预策略的有效性。