Fernández-Sáez Eva M, Bravo Susana B, Pena Carmen, García Ángel
Platelet Proteomics Group, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CiMUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Avda de Barcelona s/n, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Proteomics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20490. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05374-6.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a crucial role in cell-to-cell communication and serve as a source of biomarkers in several pathologies. In this study, we aimed to characterize plasma-derived EVs isolated by ultracentrifugation (UC) or size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to define the best method for proteomic and functional studies. EVs characterization included nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), detection of biomarkers by western blotting, and quantitative proteomic analysis. SEC-EVs samples had higher particle and protein concentration, particle-to-protein ratio, and smaller size compared to UC-EVs. A total of 171 proteins were identified through Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH-MS) analysis, with 11 increased in SEC-EVs and 5 in UC-EVs. The proteins increased in UC-EVs are complement proteins and immunoglobulins, while proteins increased in SEC-EVs are apolipoproteins and proteins present in the extracellular space. Functional studies with EVs from activated platelets confirmed that EVs isolated by SEC exacerbate platelet aggregation, whereas there was no effect induced by UC-EVs. The latter suggests that EVs obtained by SEC seem more suitable for platelet-related functional studies compared to those obtained by UC. The results presented pave the way for future clinical orientated studies involving plasma-derived EVs.
细胞外囊泡(EVs)在细胞间通讯中发挥着至关重要的作用,并且在多种病理学中作为生物标志物的来源。在本研究中,我们旨在对通过超速离心(UC)或尺寸排阻色谱法(SEC)分离的血浆来源的EVs进行表征,以确定用于蛋白质组学和功能研究的最佳方法。EVs的表征包括纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)、通过蛋白质印迹法检测生物标志物以及定量蛋白质组分析。与UC-EVs相比,SEC-EVs样品具有更高的颗粒和蛋白质浓度、颗粒与蛋白质的比率以及更小的尺寸。通过全理论质谱的顺序窗口采集(SWATH-MS)分析共鉴定出171种蛋白质,其中11种在SEC-EVs中增加,5种在UC-EVs中增加。UC-EVs中增加的蛋白质是补体蛋白和免疫球蛋白,而SEC-EVs中增加的蛋白质是载脂蛋白和细胞外空间中存在的蛋白质。对活化血小板来源的EVs进行的功能研究证实,通过SEC分离的EVs会加剧血小板聚集,而UC-EVs则没有诱导作用。后者表明,与通过UC获得的EVs相比,通过SEC获得的EVs似乎更适合用于与血小板相关的功能研究。所呈现的结果为未来涉及血浆来源的EVs的临床导向研究铺平了道路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-7-30
Trends Cell Biol. 2025-5
Extracell Vesicle. 2022-12
J Extracell Vesicles. 2024-2
J Extracell Vesicles. 2024-1
J Extracell Vesicles. 2023-12