Laakman R W, Kaufman B, Han J S, Nelson A D, Clampitt M, O'Block A M, Haaga J R, Alfidi R J
Radiology. 1985 Dec;157(3):711-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.157.3.4059558.
A total of 305 magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were performed in 236 patients with metallic implants. Most examinations were performed at 0.3 T. The metallic implants included central nervous system shunting devices, tantalum mesh, surgical wire, skin staples, surgical clips, metallic orthopedic devices, and a few miscellaneous metallic objects. Patients with cardiac pacemakers, electrical implants, prosthetic cardiac valves, and aneurysm clips were excluded from MR examinations. The images were reviewed for evidence of metallic artifact. The conspicuity of artifact was related to the composition, mass, orientation, and position of the metallic object in the body. In most instances, the metallic artifact did not interfere with the interpretation of the image. The patients' records were also reviewed for adverse effects noted by each patient during the MR examination. Only two patients reported discomfort that could possibly have been related to their metallic implants, but in both cases it seemed unlikely that the symptoms were actually related to the imaging process. There were no apparent short-term adverse effects demonstrated in these patients.
对236例有金属植入物的患者进行了共计305次磁共振(MR)检查。大多数检查在0.3T下进行。金属植入物包括中枢神经系统分流装置、钽网、手术线、皮肤钉、手术夹、金属骨科器械以及一些其他金属物品。有心脏起搏器、电子植入物、人工心脏瓣膜和动脉瘤夹的患者被排除在MR检查之外。对图像进行了检查,以寻找金属伪影的证据。伪影的明显程度与金属物体在体内的成分、质量、取向和位置有关。在大多数情况下,金属伪影并不干扰图像的解读。还查阅了患者记录,以了解每位患者在MR检查期间所报告的不良反应。只有两名患者报告了可能与他们的金属植入物有关的不适,但在这两例中,症状似乎不太可能实际与成像过程有关。这些患者未显示出明显的短期不良反应。