Corti Claudia, Frigerio Susanna, Recla Monica, Galbiati Susanna, Pastore Valentina, Porro Chiara, Storm Fabio, Urgesi Cosimo, Strazzer Sandra
Department of Severe Acquired Brain Lesions, Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Bioengineering Lab, Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06793-1.
Pediatric acquired brain injuries (ABIs) may cause significant cognitive deficits. Early rehabilitation is recommended, but there is no solid evidence on the best intervention formats. This randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of two multidomain cognitive interventions for children aged 5:0-17:11. A personalized intervention was compared with an intervention providing a fixed-dose cognitive stimulation. 40 children were randomized into the 2 study arms and received 12-week rehabilitation (3 45-minute daily sessions for 5 days per week). 34 children completed the intervention and were assessed at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1). Visual sustained attention and other cognitive measures of attention, memory, visual-spatial/visual-constructional abilities and executive functions were primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Primary and 14 of the 16 secondary outcomes showed an improvement at T1 with a medium-to-very-large effect, but training effects could not be disentangled from spontaneous recovery. No differences were found between interventions, likely because of the prolonged multidomain stimulation provided by both of them, which might have been helpful in improving the widespread cognitive deficits of children in both groups. Therefore, while for the chronic phase the guidelines recommend a personalized approach, in the early phase of recovery a standardized intervention may also be effective.
小儿获得性脑损伤(ABIs)可能会导致严重的认知缺陷。建议尽早进行康复治疗,但对于最佳干预方式尚无确凿证据。这项随机临床试验研究了两种针对5:0至17:11岁儿童的多领域认知干预措施的疗效。将个性化干预与提供固定剂量认知刺激的干预进行了比较。40名儿童被随机分为两个研究组,接受为期12周的康复治疗(每周5天,每天3次,每次45分钟)。34名儿童完成了干预,并在基线(T0)和干预后(T1)进行了评估。视觉持续注意力以及注意力、记忆力、视觉空间/视觉构建能力和执行功能的其他认知指标分别为主要和次要结局。16项次要结局中的14项以及主要结局在T1时均显示出改善,效果为中等到非常大,但训练效果无法与自然恢复区分开来。两种干预措施之间未发现差异,可能是因为它们都提供了长期的多领域刺激,这可能有助于改善两组儿童广泛存在的认知缺陷。因此,虽然对于慢性期,指南推荐采用个性化方法,但在恢复早期,标准化干预也可能有效。