Chen Chi-Chuan, Hyde Daniel C
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA; Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Cognition. 2025 Nov;264:106226. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106226. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
Establishing whether two sets of objects have the same number of objects turns out to be surprisingly challenging for children even if they have some basic number word and counting knowledge. Here we study the relationship between understanding of exact equality of sets and symbolic number knowledge in preschool children (N = 208, Age = 2.89-5.09 years) at various stages of symbolic number word acquisition. We gave children two classic verbal symbolic number word knowledge tasks (Give-N, How Many?) and two comparable but non-verbal set-matching tasks in which they were asked to produce a set of objects that numerically matched a target set. We find strong evidence that symbolic number knowledge is related to but precedes set-matching for exact equality, both replicating and extending recent findings. Specifically, set-matching accuracy was better for children who understood symbolic number cardinality compared to those who did not, even after accounting for age and executive functions. Furthermore, this effect was seen across the range of set sizes tested (1-8), including smaller set sizes (1-4) typically thought to be within the cognitive limits to be compared for exact equality non-verbally. Finally, set-matching performance was below ceiling even at set sizes corresponding to individual children's specific level of symbolic number knowledge (N) as well as the preceding quantity (N-1). Together these results suggest that understanding of exact equality builds on symbolic number knowledge. More broadly, our results support the emerging view that understanding symbolic number cardinality is only one early step towards understanding the symbolic number system.
事实证明,即使儿童掌握了一些基本的数字词汇和计数知识,判断两组物体的数量是否相同对他们来说也极具挑战性。在此,我们研究了处于符号数字词汇习得不同阶段的学龄前儿童(N = 208,年龄 = 2.89 - 5.09岁)对集合精确相等性的理解与符号数字知识之间的关系。我们给孩子们进行了两项经典的言语符号数字词汇知识任务(“给N个”、“有多少个?”)以及两项类似但非言语的集合匹配任务,要求他们生成一组在数量上与目标集合匹配的物体。我们发现有力证据表明,符号数字知识与精确相等性的集合匹配相关,但先于集合匹配,这既重复了又扩展了近期的研究结果。具体而言,与不理解符号数字基数的儿童相比,理解符号数字基数的儿童在集合匹配方面的准确性更高,即便在考虑了年龄和执行功能之后也是如此。此外,在测试的所有集合大小范围(1 - 8)内都观察到了这种效应,包括通常认为在认知范围内可通过非言语方式精确比较相等性的较小集合大小(1 - 4)。最后,即使在与每个儿童特定的符号数字知识水平(N)以及前一个数量(N - 1)相对应的集合大小下,集合匹配表现也未达到上限。这些结果共同表明,对精确相等性的理解建立在符号数字知识的基础之上。更广泛地说,我们的结果支持了一种新出现的观点,即理解符号数字基数只是迈向理解符号数字系统的早期一步。