• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者期望的与实际达成的自我、医生及家庭之间决策角色的一致性:一项多中心横断面调查

Congruence of cancer patients' desired and achieved decision-making roles between self, doctor and family: a cross-sectional multi-site survey.

作者信息

Wang Danqi, Yan Siyu, Fan Manru, Xue Hongyang, Yu Linxin, Huang Qiao, Shi Yuexian, Jin Yinghui, Zeng Xian-Tao

机构信息

Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.

Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14510-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-14510-4
PMID:40597022
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore preferred and experienced roles and their congruence among Chinese cancer patients in decision making with their doctors and families.

METHODS

We used the adapted Control Preferences Scale to identify preferred and experienced roles of patients in decision-making. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of cancer types and family involvement on patients' decision-making roles with doctors.

RESULTS

A total of 1264 respondents were included. The percentage of respondents preferring patient-led, shared or doctor-led roles in decision-making with doctors was 44.0%, 39.8%, and 16.2%, respectively. The percentage of respondents experiencing patient-led, shared or doctor-led roles in decision-making with doctors was 56.7%, 32.5%, and 10.8%, respectively. The concordance between preference and experience was moderate (κ = 0.41). Most of respondents preferred (77.14%) and experienced (70.89%) shared decision making with their families. Breast cancer patients preferred and experienced passive roles (P < 0.01), and uterine cancer patients reported that their experience was less active than their preference (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Most Chinese cancer patients actively or collaboratively participated in decision-making with their doctors. Additionally, the majority of patients preferred and experienced shared decision-making with their families. Patients with uterine cancer indicated an unsatisfied desire to participate in decision-making, while those with breast cancer tended to be more passive.

摘要

目的

探讨中国癌症患者在与医生和家人共同决策时倾向的角色及实际经历的角色,以及二者的一致性。

方法

我们使用改编后的控制偏好量表来确定患者在决策过程中倾向的角色和实际经历的角色。进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以评估癌症类型和家庭参与对患者与医生决策角色的影响。

结果

共纳入1264名受访者。在与医生决策时,倾向于患者主导、共同主导或医生主导角色的受访者比例分别为44.0%、39.8%和16.2%。在与医生决策时实际经历患者主导、共同主导或医生主导角色的受访者比例分别为56.7%、32.5%和10.8%。偏好与经历之间的一致性为中等(κ = 0.41)。大多数受访者(77.14%)倾向于并(70.89%)实际经历了与家人共同决策。乳腺癌患者倾向于并实际经历被动角色(P < 0.01),子宫癌患者表示其实际经历的参与度低于其偏好(P < 0.01)。

结论

大多数中国癌症患者积极或协作地参与与医生的决策。此外,大多数患者倾向于并实际经历了与家人共同决策。子宫癌患者表示参与决策的愿望未得到满足,而乳腺癌患者往往更为被动。

相似文献

1
Congruence of cancer patients' desired and achieved decision-making roles between self, doctor and family: a cross-sectional multi-site survey.癌症患者期望的与实际达成的自我、医生及家庭之间决策角色的一致性:一项多中心横断面调查
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14510-4.
2
Preferences on Treatment Decision Making in Sarcoma Patients: Prevalence and Associated Factors - Results from the PROSa Study.肉瘤患者治疗决策的偏好:患病率及相关因素——PROSa研究结果
Oncol Res Treat. 2025;48(4):174-185. doi: 10.1159/000543456. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
3
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Shared decision-making in the treatment of adolescents diagnosed with depression: A cross-sectional survey of mental health professionals in China.中国青少年抑郁症治疗中的共享决策:精神卫生专业人员的横断面调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):340-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
5
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
6
Shared decision-making in patients with gynecological cancer and healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional observational study in Japan.妇科癌症患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的共同决策:日本的一项横断面观察研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 May;36(3):e47. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e47. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
7
Patients' preferred and perceived level of involvement in decision making for cancer treatment: A systematic review.患者对癌症治疗决策的偏好和感知参与度:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2021 Oct;30(10):1663-1679. doi: 10.1002/pon.5750. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
8
Patient decision-making in the era of transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建时代的患者决策。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):125-135.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.035. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Does Discussing Patient-reported Outcome Measures Increase Pain Self-efficacy at an Orthopaedic Visit? A Prospective, Sequential, Comparative Series.在骨科就诊时讨论患者报告的结局指标是否会提高疼痛自我效能感?一项前瞻性、序贯性、比较性研究系列。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):624-631. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003325. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
"Let them be": Family members' perspectives on the participation of advanced cancer patients in nursing research: A qualitative descriptive study.“让他们参与”:癌症晚期患者家庭成员对其参与护理研究的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jul;155:104772. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104772. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
2
Family roles in informed consent from the perspective of young Chinese doctors: a questionnaire study.从中国年轻医生的角度看知情同意中的家庭角色:问卷调查研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00999-6.
3
Status quo of advanced cancer patients participating in shared decision-making in China: a mixed study.
中国晚期癌症患者参与共享决策的现状:混合研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 6;31(7):380. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07817-0.
4
Decision-Making Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative Setting in Jordan.约旦缓和医疗环境下晚期癌症患者的决策偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;20(8):5550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085550.
5
Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.癌症护理指南中共享决策制定的性别偏见:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1019-1038. doi: 10.1111/hex.13753. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
How Do Treatment Preferences of Patients With Cancer Compare With Those of Oncologists and Family Members? Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment in China.癌症患者的治疗偏好如何与肿瘤医生和家属的偏好相比较?来自中国离散选择实验的证据。
Value Health. 2022 Oct;25(10):1768-1777. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
Experiences of bereaved family caregivers with shared decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a qualitative interview study.丧亲家属在癌症姑息治疗中共同决策的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Sep 7;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00833-z.
8
Information, deliberation, and decisional control preferences for participation in medical decision-making and its influencing factors among Chinese cancer patients.中国癌症患者参与医疗决策的信息、审议及决策控制偏好及其影响因素
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1725-1736. doi: 10.1111/hex.13312. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
9
Patients' preferred and perceived level of involvement in decision making for cancer treatment: A systematic review.患者对癌症治疗决策的偏好和感知参与度:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2021 Oct;30(10):1663-1679. doi: 10.1002/pon.5750. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
10
Shared decision-making: summary of NICE guidance.共同决策:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南摘要
BMJ. 2021 Jun 17;373:n1430. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1430.