Suppr超能文献

鼻咽拭子中EBV DNA载量检测对鼻咽癌的诊断性能优于其他标本的检测方法。

Diagnostic performance of EBV DNA load testing for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in nasopharyngeal swab outperforms the approach in other specimens.

作者信息

Li Xue-Qi, Lin Dong-Feng, Cai Yu-Cong, Xie Shang-Hang, Lin Ke-Na, Zhou Hang-Ning, Wu Zhi-Cong, Ye Jun-Ping, Peng Yi-Nan, Ma Zheng, Guo Ling, Lin Wei, Cao Su-Mei

机构信息

Department of Cancer Prevention, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.

School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1126. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14539-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The DNA load of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can be detected in different types of specimens, however, the diagnostic performance across specimens hasn't been systematically compared in an independent study. We compared their diagnostic performances within nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), plasma, and saliva head by head in the same population in the endemic region.

METHODS

We recruited 150 newly diagnosed NPC patients and 150 non-NPC controls from two cancer centers during the 2020-2021 years in southern China. EBV DNA loads in NPS, plasma, and saliva were tested by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Meanwhile, two EBV serology antibodies of VCA-lgA and EBNA1-lgA were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sensitivity and specificity were compared among the EBV DNA loads across specimens, as well as with the traditional screening marker of EBV antibody score. Finally, the diagnostic performances for NPC with the combinations of the EBV DNA load and the antibody score were evaluated.

RESULTS

EBV DNA loads in the NPS and plasma were higher in cases, and we further evaluated the diagnostic performances for NPC. EBV DNA load in saliva had no difference in cases and controls, P = 0.84. EBV DNA load in NPS showed a sensitivity of 92.00% (95% CI: 86.44%-95.80%) and specificity of 98.67% (95% CI: 95.27%-99.84%) for NPC. Compared with EBV DNA load in NPS, the approach in plasma exhibited a lower sensitivity of 85.33% (95% CI: 78.64%-90.57%, P < 0.01) and the same specificity of 98.67% (95% CI: 95.27%-99.84%, P = 0.66). EBV antibody score demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.67% (95% CI: 89.76%-97.67%) and a specificity of 90.00% (95% CI: 84.04%-94.29%). The combination of the EBV DNA load in NPS with EBV antibody score improved the specificity to 99.33%, while maintaining the sensitivity of 88.67%.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that EBV DNA load in NPS could better discriminate NPC patients from controls than the approach in plasma. EBV DNA load in saliva had no value for NPC diagnosis. The combination of EBV DNA load in NPS with EBV antibody could further improve the specificity, while maintaining a rather good sensitivity for NPC diagnosis.

摘要

目的

可在不同类型标本中检测爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)的DNA载量,然而,尚未有独立研究对不同标本的诊断性能进行系统比较。我们在流行地区的同一人群中,对鼻咽拭子(NPS)、血浆和唾液的EBV诊断性能进行了逐一比较。

方法

2020 - 2021年期间,我们从中国南方的两个癌症中心招募了150例新诊断的鼻咽癌患者和150例非鼻咽癌对照。采用定量PCR(qPCR)检测NPS、血浆和唾液中的EBV DNA载量。同时,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)评估VCA-lgA和EBNA1-lgA两种EBV血清学抗体。比较不同标本中EBV DNA载量的敏感性和特异性,以及与EBV抗体评分这一传统筛查标志物的比较。最后,评估EBV DNA载量与抗体评分联合用于鼻咽癌诊断的性能。

结果

病例组中NPS和血浆的EBV DNA载量较高,我们进一步评估了其对鼻咽癌的诊断性能。唾液中的EBV DNA载量在病例组和对照组中无差异,P = 0.84。NPS中的EBV DNA载量对鼻咽癌的敏感性为92.00%(95%CI:86.44% - 95.80%),特异性为98.67%(95%CI:95.27% - 99.84%)。与NPS中的EBV DNA载量相比,血浆检测方法的敏感性较低,为85.33%(95%CI:78.64% - 90.57%,P < 0.01),特异性相同,为98.67%(95%CI:95.27% - 99.84%,P = 0.66)。EBV抗体评分的敏感性为94.67%(95%CI:89.76% - 97.67%),特异性为90.00%(95%CI:84.04% - 94.29%)。NPS中的EBV DNA载量与EBV抗体评分联合可将特异性提高到99.33%,同时保持88.67%的敏感性。

结论

我们证明,NPS中的EBV DNA载量比血浆检测方法能更好地区分鼻咽癌患者与对照。唾液中的EBV DNA载量对鼻咽癌诊断无价值。NPS中的EBV DNA载量与EBV抗体联合可进一步提高特异性,同时对鼻咽癌诊断保持较好的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e30d/12211123/d0909f091f80/12885_2025_14539_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Epstein-Barr virus directed screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in individuals with positive family history: A systematic review.
Oral Oncol. 2022 Oct;133:106031. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106031. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Systematic review on Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Asian populations.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(6):2577-81. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2577.
4
Anti-Epstein-Barr Virus BNLF2b for Mass Screening for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 31;389(9):808-819. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301496.
5
Long-term immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case report.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 12;16:1585844. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1585844. eCollection 2025.
6
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Ferric particle-assisted LDI-MS platform for metabolic fingerprinting of diabetic retinopathy.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Nov 30;62(5):988-998. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0775. Print 2024 Apr 25.
5
Epstein-Barr virus: Biology and clinical disease.
Cell. 2022 Sep 29;185(20):3652-3670. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.08.026. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
7
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov;18(11):679-695. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00524-x. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
A systematic review and recommendations on the use of plasma EBV DNA for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Aug;153:109-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
Epstein-Barr Virus and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases.
Front Immunol. 2021 Jan 7;11:587380. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587380. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验