Li Xue-Qi, Lin Dong-Feng, Cai Yu-Cong, Xie Shang-Hang, Lin Ke-Na, Zhou Hang-Ning, Wu Zhi-Cong, Ye Jun-Ping, Peng Yi-Nan, Ma Zheng, Guo Ling, Lin Wei, Cao Su-Mei
Department of Cancer Prevention, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1126. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14539-5.
The DNA load of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can be detected in different types of specimens, however, the diagnostic performance across specimens hasn't been systematically compared in an independent study. We compared their diagnostic performances within nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), plasma, and saliva head by head in the same population in the endemic region.
We recruited 150 newly diagnosed NPC patients and 150 non-NPC controls from two cancer centers during the 2020-2021 years in southern China. EBV DNA loads in NPS, plasma, and saliva were tested by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Meanwhile, two EBV serology antibodies of VCA-lgA and EBNA1-lgA were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sensitivity and specificity were compared among the EBV DNA loads across specimens, as well as with the traditional screening marker of EBV antibody score. Finally, the diagnostic performances for NPC with the combinations of the EBV DNA load and the antibody score were evaluated.
EBV DNA loads in the NPS and plasma were higher in cases, and we further evaluated the diagnostic performances for NPC. EBV DNA load in saliva had no difference in cases and controls, P = 0.84. EBV DNA load in NPS showed a sensitivity of 92.00% (95% CI: 86.44%-95.80%) and specificity of 98.67% (95% CI: 95.27%-99.84%) for NPC. Compared with EBV DNA load in NPS, the approach in plasma exhibited a lower sensitivity of 85.33% (95% CI: 78.64%-90.57%, P < 0.01) and the same specificity of 98.67% (95% CI: 95.27%-99.84%, P = 0.66). EBV antibody score demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.67% (95% CI: 89.76%-97.67%) and a specificity of 90.00% (95% CI: 84.04%-94.29%). The combination of the EBV DNA load in NPS with EBV antibody score improved the specificity to 99.33%, while maintaining the sensitivity of 88.67%.
We demonstrated that EBV DNA load in NPS could better discriminate NPC patients from controls than the approach in plasma. EBV DNA load in saliva had no value for NPC diagnosis. The combination of EBV DNA load in NPS with EBV antibody could further improve the specificity, while maintaining a rather good sensitivity for NPC diagnosis.
可在不同类型标本中检测爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)的DNA载量,然而,尚未有独立研究对不同标本的诊断性能进行系统比较。我们在流行地区的同一人群中,对鼻咽拭子(NPS)、血浆和唾液的EBV诊断性能进行了逐一比较。
2020 - 2021年期间,我们从中国南方的两个癌症中心招募了150例新诊断的鼻咽癌患者和150例非鼻咽癌对照。采用定量PCR(qPCR)检测NPS、血浆和唾液中的EBV DNA载量。同时,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)评估VCA-lgA和EBNA1-lgA两种EBV血清学抗体。比较不同标本中EBV DNA载量的敏感性和特异性,以及与EBV抗体评分这一传统筛查标志物的比较。最后,评估EBV DNA载量与抗体评分联合用于鼻咽癌诊断的性能。
病例组中NPS和血浆的EBV DNA载量较高,我们进一步评估了其对鼻咽癌的诊断性能。唾液中的EBV DNA载量在病例组和对照组中无差异,P = 0.84。NPS中的EBV DNA载量对鼻咽癌的敏感性为92.00%(95%CI:86.44% - 95.80%),特异性为98.67%(95%CI:95.27% - 99.84%)。与NPS中的EBV DNA载量相比,血浆检测方法的敏感性较低,为85.33%(95%CI:78.64% - 90.57%,P < 0.01),特异性相同,为98.67%(95%CI:95.27% - 99.84%,P = 0.66)。EBV抗体评分的敏感性为94.67%(95%CI:89.76% - 97.67%),特异性为90.00%(95%CI:84.04% - 94.29%)。NPS中的EBV DNA载量与EBV抗体评分联合可将特异性提高到99.33%,同时保持88.67%的敏感性。
我们证明,NPS中的EBV DNA载量比血浆检测方法能更好地区分鼻咽癌患者与对照。唾液中的EBV DNA载量对鼻咽癌诊断无价值。NPS中的EBV DNA载量与EBV抗体联合可进一步提高特异性,同时对鼻咽癌诊断保持较好的敏感性。