Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗中康复的功能目标与结果:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究

Functional goals and outcomes of rehabilitation within palliative care: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Maddocks Matthew, Fettes Lucy, Takemura Naomi, Bayly Joanne, Talbot-Rice Helena, Turner Karen, Tiberini Rebecca, Harding Richard, E M Murtagh Fliss, Siegert Richard J, Higginson Irene J, Ashford Stephen A, Turner-Stokes Lynne

机构信息

Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

School of Nursing Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01816-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation is an integral component of palliative care. An understanding of functional goals can help tailor interventions and support the evaluation of services. This study examined the nature and timescale of functional goals in palliative care, attainment of goals following personalised rehabilitation, responsiveness relative to health-related quality of life across, and factors associated with goal achievement.

METHODS

Prospective, observational cohort study of adults with advanced progressive illness from 10 UK hospices referred for rehabilitation assessment. Urgency of care needs and functional status were assessed using the palliative Phase of Illness (stable, unstable, deteriorating) and Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS, ≥ 60,60 - 50, ≤ 40) respectively. Health-related quality of life was assessed using EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5 L) utility score. Functional goals were set collaboratively with patients using SMART goal statements, mapped onto the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) was used to evaluate achievement against an anticipated outcome using a T-score. Ordinal logistic regression was sued to identify factors associated with goal achievement.

RESULTS

364 patients (54% female, mean (SD) age 68 (14) years, 71% cancer, 71% stable Phase, median AKPS 60) took part. They set a median (range) of 2 (1-4) goals; 645 in total. Goals had a median (range) timeframe of 28 (1-196) days and spanned 13/30 ICF domains; most frequently mobility, general tasks and demands, mental functions, community, social and civic life, and self-care. The majority focused on activity (51%) and participation (20%). Following personalised rehabilitation, GAS T-scores improved overall (mean (SD) change 8.9 (13.4)) and for each subgroup by Phase and AKPS (all p < 0.01). EQ-5D scores improved overall, but not for those with a deteriorating Phase or AKPS ≤ 40. Living alone or receiving multiple interventions increased the likelihood of goal achievement, whereas being wheelchair or bedbound, receiving a generic exercise intervention, or having goals rated as very difficult reduced it.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional goals in palliative care typically focus on optimising activity and participation in the short term. Progress towards personalised goals can be achieved through personalised rehabilitation, including among people with deteriorating health or largely confined to bed. Goal Attainment Scaling can help direct and evaluate rehabilitation interventions in this setting.

摘要

背景

康复是姑息治疗的一个重要组成部分。了解功能目标有助于调整干预措施并支持服务评估。本研究调查了姑息治疗中功能目标的性质和时间尺度、个性化康复后目标的达成情况、相对于健康相关生活质量的反应性,以及与目标实现相关的因素。

方法

对来自英国10家临终关怀机构的患有晚期进行性疾病的成年人进行前瞻性观察队列研究,这些患者被转介进行康复评估。分别使用疾病的姑息阶段(稳定、不稳定、恶化)和澳大利亚改良的卡氏功能状态评分(AKPS,≥60、60 - 50、≤40)评估护理需求的紧迫性和功能状态。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ - 5D - 5L)效用评分评估健康相关生活质量。与患者共同使用SMART目标陈述设定功能目标,并映射到世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)。目标达成量表(GAS)用于使用T分数评估相对于预期结果的达成情况。使用有序逻辑回归来确定与目标实现相关的因素。

结果

364名患者(54%为女性,平均(标准差)年龄68(14)岁,71%为癌症患者,71%处于稳定阶段,AKPS中位数为60)参与了研究。他们设定的目标中位数(范围)为2(1 - 4)个;总共645个目标。目标的时间尺度中位数(范围)为28(1 - 196)天,涵盖13/30个ICF领域;最常见的是移动性、一般任务和要求(活动)、心理功能、社区、社会和公民生活以及自我护理。大多数目标集中在活动(51%)和参与(20%)上。经过个性化康复后,GAS T分数总体上有所改善(平均(标准差)变化8.9(13.4)),并且按阶段和AKPS划分的每个亚组均如此(所有p < 0.01)。EQ - 5D分数总体上有所改善,但处于恶化阶段或AKPS≤40的患者除外。独居或接受多种干预措施增加了目标实现成功的可能性,而使用轮椅或卧床不起、接受一般运动干预或目标被评为非常困难则降低了目标实现成功的可能性。

结论

姑息治疗中的功能目标通常侧重于在短期内优化活动和参与。通过个性化康复可以实现朝着个性化目标的进展,包括在健康状况恶化或基本卧床的人群中。目标达成量表有助于在此背景下指导和评估康复干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/291a/12210815/f604e0ac16c7/12904_2025_1816_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验