Zambeli-Ljepović Alan, Ibingira Treasure, Stephens Caroline, Koch Rachel, Boeck Marissa A, Ozgediz Doruk, Namugga Martha
Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Suite S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0470, USA.
Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02953-2.
In low-income countries, clinicians trained through a context-specific trauma surgery fellowship program (TFP) can help reduce injury-related mortality to levels closer to those observed in higher-resource settings. Successful implementation, however, hinges on buy-in from local clinicians. We assessed clinician support for a potential TFP in Uganda, considering perceived need, curricular recommendations, barriers, and motivating factors.
After cognitive interviews with experts and questionnaire pilot testing, we cross-sectionally surveyed Ugandan consultants (general surgeons and procedural specialists involved in trauma care) and surgical residents at a tertiary, national referral hospital. Respondent percentages were calculated for multiple-choice answers, and we performed thematic analysis of free-text responses using a primarily inductive approach.
Among 46 faculty (from 13 specialties) and 42 resident respondents, 86% supported a Ugandan TFP. Respondents recommended incorporating emergency general surgery (66%), critical care (84%), and international rotations (76%) into the curriculum. Severe resource and structural deficiencies (82%) and concern about governmental support for post-training employment and compensation (66%) were leading perceived barriers to TFP implementation. Most faculty felt a TFP would improve patient outcomes (93%), overall trainee education (77%), and clinical efficiency (68%). Free-text responses were consistent with survey themes, indicating acute awareness of current trauma system inadequacies and conviction that a TFP would reduce injury-related mortality.
Ugandan clinicians who care for injured patients view a TFP as crucial to improving injury-related outcomes, despite known barriers. TFP implementation should incorporate curricular recommendations from this survey and address widespread concerns about financial and infrastructural support from the national government and local institutions.
在低收入国家,通过针对特定环境的创伤外科专科培训项目(TFP)培养的临床医生有助于将创伤相关死亡率降低至更接近资源丰富地区的水平。然而,该项目的成功实施取决于当地临床医生的认可。我们评估了乌干达临床医生对潜在TFP的支持情况,考虑了他们所感知的需求、课程建议、障碍及激励因素。
在对专家进行认知访谈并对问卷进行预测试后,我们对一家国家级三级转诊医院的乌干达顾问医生(参与创伤护理的普通外科医生和操作专科医生)及外科住院医师进行了横断面调查。计算多项选择题答案的受访者百分比,并采用主要为归纳法的方式对自由文本回复进行主题分析。
在46名教员(来自13个专业)和42名住院医师受访者中,86%支持乌干达的TFP。受访者建议将急诊普通外科(66%)、重症监护(84%)和国际轮转(76%)纳入课程。严重的资源和结构缺陷(82%)以及对政府在培训后就业和薪酬方面支持的担忧(66%)是TFP实施过程中被认为的主要障碍。大多数教员认为TFP将改善患者治疗效果(93%)、整体学员教育(77%)和临床效率(68%)。自由文本回复与调查主题一致,表明他们敏锐地意识到当前创伤系统的不足,并坚信TFP将降低创伤相关死亡率。
尽管存在已知障碍,但负责救治创伤患者的乌干达临床医生认为TFP对于改善创伤相关治疗效果至关重要。TFP的实施应纳入本次调查的课程建议,并解决对国家政府和当地机构在财政和基础设施支持方面的广泛担忧。