• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床培训中的学习组合

Portfolio of learning in clinical training.

作者信息

Jenkins Louis S

机构信息

Primary Health Care Directorate, Department of Family, Community and Emergency Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; and, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Western Cape Department of Health, George Hospital, George, South Africa; and, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town.

出版信息

S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2025 Jun 4;67(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/safp.v67i1.6080.

DOI:10.4102/safp.v67i1.6080
PMID:40599015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12224119/
Abstract

Workplace-based assessment is increasingly crucial in the postgraduate training of specialists in South Africa, including for family physicians. A portfolio of learning allows a structured, flexible way to present evidence of learning. Portfolios are increasingly digitally based as e-portfolios. Portfolios are used for encouraging self-reflective learning, for transforming learning, and for gathering evidence of skills necessary for future employment. Portfolios support assessment for learning and assessment of learning. This necessitates registrar reflections, supervisor feedback and interaction, and linkages to entrustable professional activities (EPAs). The e-portfolio facilitates triangulation, aggregation and saturation of data points for the various EPAs to support clinical competency committees to make high-stakes evaluations of registrar portfolios. While the initial design and development costs are significant, operational costs become affordable when shared across all training programmes. The portfolio of learning has been a key priority in family medicine for almost 15 years. Initially, a paper-based portfolio was adopted to collect evidence of learning for the national exit-level outcomes. It was converted into an e-portfolio and implemented nationally through the coordination of the South African Academy of Family Physicians. In 2023, the e-portfolio was redesigned to gather evidence of learning for 22 EPAs, and a further revision took place in 2024. A portfolio of learning offers a valuable alternative to traditional assessment methods, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of registrars' growth over time.

摘要

在南非,包括家庭医生在内的专科医生研究生培训中,基于工作场所的评估日益重要。学习档案袋提供了一种结构化、灵活的方式来展示学习证据。档案袋越来越多地以数字形式存在,即电子档案袋。档案袋用于鼓励自我反思学习、促进学习转变以及收集未来就业所需技能的证据。档案袋支持形成性评估和终结性评估。这需要住院医生进行反思、导师提供反馈和互动,并与可托付专业活动(EPA)建立联系。电子档案袋有助于对各种EPA的数据点进行三角测量、汇总和饱和分析,以支持临床能力委员会对住院医生档案袋进行高风险评估。虽然初始设计和开发成本很高,但当在所有培训项目中分摊时,运营成本就变得可以承受。近15年来,学习档案袋一直是家庭医学的关键优先事项。最初,采用纸质档案袋来收集全国结业水平成果的学习证据。后来它被转换为电子档案袋,并通过南非家庭医生学会的协调在全国实施。2023年,电子档案袋重新设计,以收集22项EPA的学习证据,并于2024年进行了进一步修订。学习档案袋为传统评估方法提供了一种有价值的替代方案,能够全面了解住院医生随时间的成长情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12224119/bafa64af893b/SAFP-67-6080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12224119/5efbfc9df032/SAFP-67-6080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12224119/bafa64af893b/SAFP-67-6080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12224119/5efbfc9df032/SAFP-67-6080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12224119/bafa64af893b/SAFP-67-6080-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Portfolio of learning in clinical training.临床培训中的学习组合
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2025 Jun 4;67(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/safp.v67i1.6080.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12.研究生评估与教育组合的有效性:BEME指南第12号
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):299-318. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056.
4
Developing an electronic portfolio of learning for family medicine training in South Africa.开发南非家庭医学培训电子学习档案。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Jun 28;16(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4525.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Best evidence on the educational effects of undergraduate portfolios.关于本科学习档案袋教育效果的最佳证据。
Clin Teach. 2010 Sep;7(3):187-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00364.x.
7
Do coursework summative assessments predict clinical performance? A systematic review.课程总结性评估能否预测临床能力?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0878-3.
8
A Scoping Review of the Literature on Entrustable Professional Activities in Surgery Residency Programs.外科住院医师培训计划中可委托专业活动文献的范围综述
J Surg Educ. 2024 Jun;81(6):823-840. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
9
Functional Elements of Entrusted Professional Activities for Dental Educators: Protocol for a Scoping Review.牙科教育工作者委托专业活动的功能要素:范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 25;14:e74225. doi: 10.2196/74225.
10
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing an electronic portfolio of learning for family medicine training in South Africa.开发南非家庭医学培训电子学习档案。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Jun 28;16(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4525.
2
Development of entrustable professional activities for family medicine in South Africa.南非家庭医学可委托专业活动的发展。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Mar 29;16(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4483.
3
"We just don't have the resources": Supervisor perspectives on introducing workplace-based assessments into medical specialist training in South Africa.
“我们只是没有资源”:南非将基于工作场所的评估引入医学专家培训的主管观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04840-x.
4
Developing entrustable professional activities for family medicine training in South Africa.在南非开发家庭医学培训的可委托专业活动。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023 Feb 17;65(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/safp.v65i1.5690.
5
An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review.医学研究生教育中当前 EPA 的最新情况:范围综述。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1981198. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1981198.
6
The Purpose, Structure, and Process of Clinical Competency Committees: Guidance for Members and Program Directors.临床能力委员会的目的、结构与流程:给委员及项目主任的指南
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2 Suppl):45-50. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00841.1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140.推荐的可委托专业活动描述:AMEE 指南第 140 号。
Med Teach. 2021 Oct;43(10):1106-1114. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838465. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
Entrustment Decision Making: Extending Miller's Pyramid.委托决策制定:扩展米勒金字塔。
Acad Med. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):199-204. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003800.
9
How is self-regulated learning documented in e-portfolios of trainees? A content analysis.学习者电子档案中的自我调节学习是如何记录的?一项内容分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02114-4.
10
Relationships as the Backbone of Feedback: Exploring Preceptor and Resident Perceptions of Their Behaviors During Feedback Conversations.关系是反馈的支柱:探索导师和住院医师在反馈对话中对彼此行为的看法。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1073-1081. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002971.