Mehrlatifan Somayeh, Fatahi Ali, Khezri Davood
Department of Sports Biomechanics, CT.C Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran.
Department of Sport Biomechanics and Technology Sport Sciences Research Institute Tehran Iran.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 30;8(7):e70988. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70988. eCollection 2025 Jul.
The butterfly diagram is an effective tool for visualizing gait patterns and identifying potential areas of instability in the elderly individuals who fall. Nevertheless, there is a lack of comprehensive exploration regarding the quantification of variability at the intersections in butterfly diagrams. We proposed the utilization of kernel density estimation (KDE) and center of pressure (COP) symmetry index to analyze the spatial probability distribution of intersections in butterfly diagrams and to characterize the variability of gait patterns in elderly fallers.
Twenty active elderly individuals (including both fallers and non-fallers) volunteered to participate in this study. Initially, the self-selected walking speed of each subject was assessed using a treadmill. Subsequently, each participant walked for a duration of 60 s. The bilateral toe-off (TO) and initial contact (IC) points of the butterfly diagram were identified for the computation of the COP symmetry index and the intersections of bilateral TO-IC. Following this, the intersections within the walking window were utilized to assess their density and variability through Kernel density estimation.
Fallers exhibited a significantly greater COP symmetry index (mean = 0.09, SD = 0.55), than non-fallers (mean = 0.58, SD = 0.56; sig. = 0.03, η = 0.09). No significant differences were found in step width, step length, or COP distances ( > 0.05). KDE revealed distinct variability patterns: non-fallers showed two patterns (A, B), while fallers displayed three (C, D, E), suggesting greater gait instability in fallers.
KDE and COP symmetry analysis appeared to effectively quantify gait variability, offering insights into fall risk factors and potential intervention targets for elderly women.
蝴蝶图是一种有效的工具,可用于可视化步态模式并识别跌倒老年人潜在的不稳定区域。然而,对于蝴蝶图中交叉点变异性的量化缺乏全面的探索。我们提出利用核密度估计(KDE)和压力中心(COP)对称指数来分析蝴蝶图中交叉点的空间概率分布,并描述老年跌倒者步态模式的变异性。
20名活跃的老年人(包括跌倒者和非跌倒者)自愿参与本研究。首先,使用跑步机评估每个受试者的自选步行速度。随后,每位参与者步行60秒。确定蝴蝶图的双侧蹬离(TO)和初始接触(IC)点,以计算COP对称指数和双侧TO-IC的交叉点。在此之后,利用步行窗口内的交叉点通过核密度估计来评估其密度和变异性。
跌倒者的COP对称指数(平均值=0.09,标准差=0.55)显著高于非跌倒者(平均值=0.58,标准差=0.56;显著性=0.03,η=0.09)。步宽、步长或COP距离方面未发现显著差异(>0.05)。KDE揭示了不同的变异性模式:非跌倒者表现出两种模式(A、B),而跌倒者表现出三种模式(C、D、E),表明跌倒者的步态不稳定程度更高。
KDE和COP对称分析似乎能有效量化步态变异性,为老年女性的跌倒风险因素和潜在干预靶点提供见解。