Jiang Chenyu, Zhu Luqi, Yang Wenyuan, Yu Zhenjun, Yang Weiwei, Jin Xiaolong, Shao Yaojian
Department of Geriatric, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 17;13:1578257. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578257. eCollection 2025.
Socioeconomic inequality is closely related to the incidence of () infection and mortality outcomes. Accordingly, this study was designed with the goal of exploring the relationship between familial poverty, seropositivity, and all-cause mortality among adults in the United States.
Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2000) was used to conduct analysis. Family poverty to income ratio (PIR) was applied to evaluate socioeconomic status. The interplay between serostatus and PIR was evaluated through univariate and multivariable approaches. The relationship between PIR, serostatus, and the incidence of all-cause mortality was further assessed through Cox regression analysis, restricted cubic spline, and survival analysis.
A total of 3,573 individuals were included in this study. PIR values were found to be negatively associated with seropositivity incidence after adjusting for potential covariates. Smooth curve fitting suggested that the relationship between these two variables was largely linear. Subgroup analyses confirmed that PIR values were still closely associated with seropositivity independently. Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that lower PIR was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality in both seropositivity and seronegative group, whereas serostatus showed no association with all-cause mortality. Additional analysis using smooth curve fitting indicated a nonlinear relationship between PIR and all-cause mortality. The survival analysis further indicated that individuals with higher PIR values exhibited lower mortality rates, regardless of serostatus.
The present analyses reveal an inverse association between PIR values and seropositivity and all-cause mortality. The relationship between PIR and all-cause mortality was not affected by seropositivity. serostatus is not a major risk factor for all-cause mortality. However, additional studies will be essential to better clarify the clinical relevance of these findings and to elucidate the underlying findings.
社会经济不平等与()感染的发生率及死亡率密切相关。因此,本研究旨在探讨美国家庭贫困、血清学阳性与成年人全因死亡率之间的关系。
使用国家健康与营养检查调查(1999 - 2000年)的数据进行分析。采用家庭贫困与收入比(PIR)来评估社会经济地位。通过单变量和多变量方法评估血清学状态与PIR之间的相互作用。通过Cox回归分析、受限立方样条和生存分析进一步评估PIR、血清学状态与全因死亡率发生率之间的关系。
本研究共纳入3573人。在调整潜在协变量后,发现PIR值与血清学阳性发生率呈负相关。平滑曲线拟合表明这两个变量之间的关系在很大程度上是线性的。亚组分析证实PIR值仍与血清学阳性独立密切相关。此外,多变量Cox回归分析表明,在血清学阳性和血清学阴性组中,较低的PIR均与全因死亡率增加相关,而血清学状态与全因死亡率无关。使用平滑曲线拟合的额外分析表明PIR与全因死亡率之间存在非线性关系。生存分析进一步表明,无论血清学状态如何,PIR值较高的个体死亡率较低。
本分析揭示了PIR值与血清学阳性及全因死亡率之间存在负相关。PIR与全因死亡率之间的关系不受血清学阳性的影响。血清学状态不是全因死亡率的主要危险因素。然而,需要更多研究来更好地阐明这些发现的临床相关性并阐明潜在机制。