Ammann Kaitlyn R, Outridge Christine E, Silver Tiana, Muslmani Sami, Ding Jun, Gilman Vladimir, Corbett Scott, Slepian Marvin J
Arizona Center for Accelerated Biomedical Innovation, Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona Health Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Sep;106(3):1713-1722. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31663. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
Cardiovascular therapeutic devices typically require systemic heparin due to underlying thrombotic risk. The Impella axial flow system further relies on internal perfusion with either a heparin-containing or sodium bicarbonate purge solution during operation. The combination of systemic and device-mediated heparin often contributes to varying levels of overall anticoagulation, raising the possibility of increased bleeding risk and complications due to heparin sensitivity. To reduce adverse events, efforts have been ongoing to eliminate heparin, both systemically and via the device. Here, we investigate bivalirudin as an alternative to systemic heparin and sodium bicarbonate as an alternative to local device heparin in the purge solution.
We examined hemocompatibility in a mock loop environment with circulating whole porcine blood to determine feasibility of heparin-free Impella system. Anticoagulated (heparin or bivalirudin) blood was loaded into a circulatory loop with a contained Impella 5.5 and run for 4 h with either heparin or sodium bicarbonate-containing purge solution. Blood samples were collected serially and analyzed for metrics of hemocompatibility: hemolysis, platelet activation, and vWF degradation.
Bivalirudin and sodium bicarbonate adjunctive environment led to similar or improved hemocompatibility as compared to heparin-containing environment-notably, decreased hemolysis (40 ± 20.8 mg/dL average decrease) and preserved platelet activity measured by P-selectin exposure (8.0 ± 5.6% average increase).
Our data supports the potential to create an overall heparin-free approach simplifying anticoagulation management, offering potential for overall reduced bleeding risk and heparin-related complications.
由于存在潜在的血栓形成风险,心血管治疗设备通常需要全身性肝素。Impella轴流系统在运行过程中进一步依赖于使用含肝素或碳酸氢钠冲洗液进行内部灌注。全身性肝素与设备介导的肝素联合使用往往会导致不同程度的整体抗凝,增加了因肝素敏感性而导致出血风险和并发症增加的可能性。为了减少不良事件,一直在努力消除全身性肝素以及通过设备使用的肝素。在此,我们研究比伐卢定作为全身性肝素的替代物,以及碳酸氢钠作为冲洗液中局部设备肝素的替代物。
我们在模拟循环环境中使用猪全血循环来检查血液相容性,以确定无肝素Impella系统的可行性。将抗凝(肝素或比伐卢定)血液装入含有Impella 5.5的循环回路中,并用含肝素或碳酸氢钠的冲洗液运行4小时。连续采集血样并分析血液相容性指标:溶血、血小板活化和血管性血友病因子(vWF)降解。
与含肝素环境相比,比伐卢定和碳酸氢钠辅助环境导致相似或更好的血液相容性——值得注意的是,溶血减少(平均降低40±20.8mg/dL),通过P-选择素暴露测量的血小板活性得以保留(平均增加8.0±5.6%)。
我们的数据支持创建一种整体无肝素方法的潜力,这种方法可简化抗凝管理,有可能总体降低出血风险和肝素相关并发症。