Suppr超能文献

一项多中心研究,旨在评估即时检测的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)科巴斯SARS-CoV-2及甲型/乙型流感核酸检测在科巴斯Liat系统上的性能,并与美国各医疗机构的集中检测方法进行比较。

A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States.

作者信息

Robbins Elissa M, Bertuzis Rasa, Chiu Ho-Chen, Miller Lupe, Noutsios Christopher

机构信息

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Pleasanton, California, USA.

Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Aug 13;63(8):e0145924. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01459-24. Epub 2025 Jul 2.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Respiratory diseases can share many of the same symptoms, highlighting the need for timely and accurate differentiation to facilitate effective clinical management and reduce transmission. Compared with centralized testing, molecular point-of-care tests (POCTs) can provide a faster time to result. We evaluated the RT-PCR POCT Cobas® SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B qualitative assay for use on the Cobas Liat system (the POC SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B test) in nasal and nasopharyngeal swab samples from 10 diverse healthcare facilities in the United States. A composite comparator design consisting of three centralized tests was used to analyze severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), while performance vs a single centralized test was used for analysis of influenza A and B. Evaluations included performance stratified by sample type (prospective/retrospective and nasal/nasopharyngeal [paired by subject]), collection method (self/healthcare worker-collected [alternated and approximately balanced]), symptom status (symptomatic/asymptomatic), and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status, as well as assay inclusivity and system ease of use. A total of 2,247 samples were tested. For SARS-CoV-2, the overall percent agreement (OPA) was 98.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97.9, 99.3) in nasal swab samples and 99.0% (95% CI: 98.2, 99.4) in nasopharyngeal swab samples. Regression analysis showed that cycle threshold values from paired nasal and nasopharyngeal swab samples were highly correlated (correlation coefficient 0.83). The OPA was ≥99.5% (sample type dependent) and 100.0% for influenza A and B, respectively. The POC SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B test was easy to use. These results support the use of the POCT in various sample types and by various operators in the intended-use setting.

IMPORTANCE

This study highlights the benefits of RT-PCR point-of-care tests, namely comparable performance to centralized testing in multiple sample types and ease of use. Utilizing assays such as the POC Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B test may improve the timely differentiation of respiratory diseases that share similar symptoms.

摘要

未标注

呼吸道疾病可能有许多相同的症状,这凸显了及时准确鉴别以促进有效临床管理和减少传播的必要性。与集中检测相比,分子即时检验(POCT)能更快得出结果。我们评估了用于Cobas Liat系统的RT-PCR POCT Cobas® SARS-CoV-2 & 甲型/乙型流感定性检测(POC SARS-CoV-2 & 甲型/乙型流感检测),该检测针对美国10家不同医疗机构的鼻拭子和鼻咽拭子样本。采用由三项集中检测组成的复合比较器设计来分析严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2),而针对甲型和乙型流感的分析则与单一集中检测进行性能比较。评估内容包括按样本类型分层的性能(前瞻性/回顾性以及鼻拭子/鼻咽拭子[按受试者配对])、采集方法(自我采集/医护人员采集[交替且大致平衡])、症状状态(有症状/无症状)以及SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种状态,还有检测的包容性和系统易用性。总共检测了2247份样本。对于SARS-CoV-2,鼻拭子样本的总体一致性百分比(OPA)为98.8%(95%置信区间[CI]:97.9, 99.3),鼻咽拭子样本为99.0%(95% CI:98.2, 99.4)。回归分析表明,配对鼻拭子和鼻咽拭子样本的循环阈值高度相关(相关系数0.83)。甲型和乙型流感的OPA分别≥99.5%(取决于样本类型)和100.0%。POC SARS-CoV-2 & 甲型/乙型流感检测易于使用。这些结果支持在预期使用环境中,该POCT可用于各种样本类型并由各种操作人员使用。

重要性

本研究强调了RT-PCR即时检验的益处,即在多种样本类型中性能与集中检测相当且易于使用。使用诸如POC Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & 甲型/乙型流感检测等检测方法可能会改善对有相似症状的呼吸道疾病的及时鉴别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae7/12345166/5aaedc2db79a/jcm.01459-24.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验