Gao Xueyuan, Reich Peter B, Vincent Jeffrey R, Fagan Matthew E, Chazdon Robin L, Fritz Steffen, Schepaschenko Dmitry, Potts Matthew D, Hansen Matthew C, Jung Martin, Brancalion Pedro H S, Uriarte María, Keenan Trevor F, Crowther Thomas W, Dubayah Ralph O, Lesiv Myroslava, Liang Shunlin, Wang Dongdong
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 2;16(1):6092. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1.
Naturally regenerated forests and managed tree systems provide different levels of carbon, biodiversity, and livelihood benefits. Here, we show that tree cover gains in the moist tropics during 1982-2015 were 56% ± 3% naturally regenerated forests and 27% ± 2.6% managed tree systems, with these differences in forest type, not only natural conditions (climate, soil, and topography), driving observed carbon recovery rates. The remaining 17% ± 3% likely represents small, unmanaged tree patches within non-forest cover types. Achieving global forest restoration goals requires robust monitoring, reporting, and verification of forest types established by restoration initiatives.
自然再生林和人工管理的树木系统提供不同程度的碳、生物多样性和生计效益。我们在此表明,1982年至2015年期间,潮湿热带地区树木覆盖面积的增加中,自然再生林占56%±3%,人工管理的树木系统占27%±2.6%,造成森林类型差异的不仅是自然条件(气候、土壤和地形),这些差异还影响了观测到的碳恢复率。其余17%±3%可能代表非森林覆盖类型内的小型、未管理树木斑块。要实现全球森林恢复目标,需要对恢复倡议所建立的森林类型进行有力的监测、报告和核实。