• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生对职业病的管理:瑞士法语区的一项定性研究。

General practitioners' management of occupational diseases: a qualitative study in French-speaking Switzerland.

作者信息

Coline Gaubicher, Philippe Staeger, Brigitta Danuser, Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger, Peggy Krief, Zakia Mediouni

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Department of Ambulatory Care, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02888-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02888-w
PMID:40604409
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Work-related health problems are a frequent reason for consultation with primary care physicians; however, few studies report on the way general practitioners' (GPs) approach work-related health issues with their patients.

AIM

To investigate the practices of Swiss GPs in regarding work-related health issues presented by their patients, and to identify the resources and difficulties they faced.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 GPs, transcribed, and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

GPs do explore their patients' occupational field. However, the data collected are limited, even though doctors recognize that a high proportion of mental and musculoskeletal disorders may be work-related. Work-related disease insurance issues are a frequent concern in GPs everyday practice, often causing a discomfort regarding these issues. Exchanges between GPs and employers regarding work-related health issues are relatively uncommon but can yield positive outcomes when they occur. Occupational risk prevention is confined to certain high-risk exposures. When asked to express their difficulties in dealing with work-related issues, GPs mention the lack of dedicated time, insurance issues, contact with employers or the lack of it and lack of training. As for resources, GPs mainly identify specialist doctors, but still, only few of them mention occupational physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Some work-related pathologies, whether frequent or serious, are not systematically investigated by GPs. This raises the question of their detection and probable under-reporting. To improve anamnesis, identification, and referral practices for occupational health issues, we suggest a targeted training for GPs, strengthened networking among stakeholders-such as occupational physicians, employers and insurers- and a revision of medical billing structures to better support the management of work-related diseases for both GPs and occupational physicians.

摘要

背景

与工作相关的健康问题是患者咨询初级保健医生的常见原因;然而,很少有研究报告全科医生(GP)与患者探讨与工作相关健康问题的方式。

目的

调查瑞士全科医生处理患者提出的与工作相关健康问题的做法,并确定他们面临的资源和困难。

方法

对12名全科医生进行了半结构化访谈,进行转录并进行主题分析。

结果

全科医生确实会探究患者的职业领域。然而,尽管医生认识到很大一部分精神和肌肉骨骼疾病可能与工作有关,但收集到的数据仍然有限。与工作相关的疾病保险问题在全科医生的日常实践中经常受到关注,常常引发他们对这些问题的不适。全科医生与雇主之间就与工作相关的健康问题进行的交流相对较少,但一旦发生,可能会产生积极的结果。职业风险预防仅限于某些高风险暴露。当被要求表达他们在处理与工作相关问题时遇到的困难时,全科医生提到缺乏专门时间、保险问题、与雇主的联系或缺乏联系以及缺乏培训。至于资源,全科医生主要确定专科医生,但仍然只有少数人提到职业医生。

结论

一些与工作相关的病症,无论常见与否或严重程度如何,并不能被全科医生系统地调查。这就提出了它们的检测以及可能存在的报告不足的问题。为了改善职业健康问题的问诊、识别和转诊做法,我们建议对全科医生进行有针对性的培训,加强利益相关者(如职业医生、雇主和保险公司)之间的网络联系,并修订医疗计费结构,以更好地支持全科医生和职业医生对与工作相关疾病的管理。

相似文献

1
General practitioners' management of occupational diseases: a qualitative study in French-speaking Switzerland.全科医生对职业病的管理:瑞士法语区的一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02888-w.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
7
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
10
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
[Online survey of the medical profession about knowledge of occupational diseases].[关于职业病知识的医学专业在线调查]
Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Ergon. 2022;72(6):245-251. doi: 10.1007/s40664-022-00475-9. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
2
[Occupational cancers: essentials for the general practioners].[职业性癌症:全科医生须知]
Rev Med Suisse. 2022 Jun 29;18(788):1313-1321. doi: 10.53738/REVMED.2022.18.788.1313.
3
[Return to work: challenges and opportunities for the primary care physician].重返工作岗位:基层医疗医生面临的挑战与机遇
Rev Med Suisse. 2022 Jun 29;18(788):1295-1299. doi: 10.53738/REVMED.2022.18.788.1295.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Rev Med Suisse. 2022 Jun 29;18(788):1287-1288. doi: 10.53738/REVMED.2022.18.788.1287.
5
The role of the Swiss list of occupational diseases in the protection of workers' health.瑞士职业病清单在保护工人健康方面的作用。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Jul 28;151:w20538. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.20538. eCollection 2021 Jul 19.
6
[Interprofessional Care of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from the Perspective of a General Practitioner Perspective: Results of a Cross-sectional Study].[从全科医生视角看类风湿关节炎患者的跨专业照护:一项横断面研究的结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Feb;83(2):e1-e8. doi: 10.1055/a-1152-4576. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study.医生的形象和认知是跨学科合作的障碍吗?——以德国职业健康医生在康复过程中的情况为例:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3564-1.
8
Cancers in France in 2015 attributable to occupational exposures.2015 年法国归因于职业暴露的癌症。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Jan;222(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
9
[Interface Problems Between Inpatient, GP and Outpatient Specialist Care: Viewpoint of General Practitioners in Dresden].[住院患者、全科医生与门诊专科护理之间的衔接问题:德累斯顿全科医生的观点]
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Oct;81(10):822-830. doi: 10.1055/a-0664-0470. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
10
Asbestos, asbestosis, and cancer: The Helsinki criteria for diagnosis and attribution. Critical need for revision of the 2014 update.石棉、石棉肺与癌症:赫尔辛基诊断及归因标准。亟需对2014年更新版进行修订。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 May;60(5):411-421. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22709.