Rahgoshay Niloofar, Rahdar Mohammad, Nikoo Laleh, Daneshmandi Hadi
Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Ergonomics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2192. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23379-8.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The comparison between squatting and sitting toilets involves complex health, ergonomic, and design considerations. This scoping review aims to synthesize evidence on the digestive, musculoskeletal, and ergonomic health outcomes associated with squatting and sitting toilet postures, while also exploring related health impacts (e.g., urinary and cardiovascular) and design considerations.
This scoping review was conducted on January 1, 2024, searching Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were defined using the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) framework. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, supplemented by hand searches in Google Scholar and Science Direct, and snowballing. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists.
Forty-two studies were analyzed. Squatting may reduce digestive strain and enhance bowel evacuation, potentially benefiting constipation, while sitting toilets may increase bowel-related issues but provide comfort for specific populations, such as older adults. Musculoskeletal outcomes vary, with squatting linked to strain in vulnerable groups and sitting toilets reducing joint stress when ergonomically designed. Ergonomic innovations, such as adjustable seats and non-slip surfaces, show promise in improving comfort and minimizing health risks. Methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and inadequate control of confounders, preclude definitive conclusions.
Squatting and sitting toilet postures differentially influence digestive health, musculoskeletal strain, and sanitation, shaped by individual needs, cultural practices, and environmental factors. Practical implications include developing adjustable, hygiene-focused, culturally sensitive toilet designs to enhance public health. Longitudinal studies with robust methodologies are needed to clarify chronic health impacts and optimize user-centered toilet design solutions.
背景/目的:蹲厕和坐厕的比较涉及复杂的健康、人体工程学和设计考量。本综述旨在综合关于蹲姿和坐姿厕所姿势对消化、肌肉骨骼和人体工程学健康结果的证据,同时探讨相关的健康影响(如泌尿和心血管方面)以及设计考量。
本综述于2024年1月1日进行,遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)指南,检索了Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science数据库。纳入标准使用患者/人群、干预措施、对照和结局(PICO)框架来定义。两名评审员独立筛选标题、摘要和全文,并辅以在谷歌学术和科学Direct中进行的手动检索以及滚雪球法。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)检查表评估方法学质量。
分析了42项研究。蹲姿可能会减轻消化压力并促进排便,对便秘可能有益,而坐厕可能会增加肠道相关问题,但为特定人群(如老年人)提供舒适感。肌肉骨骼方面的结果各不相同,蹲姿与弱势群体的劳损有关,而设计符合人体工程学的坐厕可减轻关节压力。人体工程学创新,如可调节座椅和防滑表面,在提高舒适度和最小化健康风险方面显示出前景。方法学上的局限性,包括样本量小和混杂因素控制不足,妨碍了得出明确结论。
蹲姿和坐厕姿势对消化健康、肌肉骨骼劳损和卫生设施有不同影响,这受到个人需求、文化习俗和环境因素的影响。实际意义包括开发可调节、注重卫生、对文化敏感的厕所设计以促进公众健康。需要采用稳健方法的纵向研究来阐明慢性健康影响并优化以用户为中心的厕所设计解决方案。