Ordobazari Jasmin, Pfeiffer Charlotte, Leandro Adriano Wang, Quadflieg Ina, Volk Holger A, Karbe Georga T
Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hanover, Germany.
J Feline Med Surg. 2025 Jul;27(7):1098612X251336702. doi: 10.1177/1098612X251336702. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided cholecystostomy drain placement.MethodsAn experimental cadaveric study was conducted on 16 cat cadavers weighing between 2.5 and 6.4 kg. Two drain systems were tested for percutaneous ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided placement: the nephrostomy component of a subcutaneous urethral bypass system (SUB-nephrostomy drain) and a paediatric percutaneous access set (paediatric-nephrostomy drain). Ultrasound-guided cholecystocentesis was performed via the 8th-12th intercostal space. Using a Seldinger technique, a guidewire was advanced into the gallbladder over which the drains were then passed under fluoroscopic control. Protocol modification was required mid experiment. Gallbladders were filled via catheterisation of the common bile duct before cholecystocentesis. After fluoroscopy-confirmed cholecystostomy drain placement, CT scans were performed to assess drain position, iatrogenic organ injuries and leakage. Leak pressure testing was performed followed by anatomic dissection. Organ injuries were recorded and classified as minor, moderate or severe.ResultsSUB-nephrostomy drain placement was performed in 15 cats and placement into the gallbladder was feasible in two: one was passed before and one after technique modification. Paediatric-nephrostomy drain placement was tested in one cat. The gallbladder could not accommodate the drain size, placement was not feasible and the device was not further tested. A CT scan of the two cats with drain placement showed a moderate amount of free peritoneal contrast, no pleural space penetration and one liver injury. Leakage occurred at a pressure of 4.5 cm HO. For all drains, injuries recorded during anatomic dissection were to the liver, pleural space and gallbladder. The majority of injuries were classified as minor.Conclusions and relevancePercutaneous placement of cholecystostomy drains was not feasible with the method and devices tested. Further studies are needed to investigate alternative techniques in cats.
目的
本研究旨在评估经皮超声和透视引导下胆囊造瘘引流管置入的可行性和安全性。
方法
对16只体重在2.5至6.4千克之间的猫尸体进行了一项实验性尸体研究。测试了两种用于经皮超声和透视引导置入的引流系统:皮下尿道旁路系统的肾造瘘组件(SUB-肾造瘘引流管)和儿科经皮穿刺套件(儿科-肾造瘘引流管)。通过第8至12肋间间隙进行超声引导下胆囊穿刺。采用Seldinger技术,将导丝推进到胆囊内,然后在透视控制下将引流管通过导丝置入。实验过程中需要对方案进行修改。在胆囊穿刺前通过胆总管插管使胆囊充盈。在透视确认胆囊造瘘引流管置入后,进行CT扫描以评估引流管位置、医源性器官损伤和渗漏情况。进行渗漏压力测试,随后进行解剖。记录器官损伤情况并分为轻度、中度或重度。
结果
在15只猫中进行了SUB-肾造瘘引流管置入,其中两只成功置入胆囊:一只在技术修改前,一只在技术修改后。在一只猫中测试了儿科-肾造瘘引流管置入。胆囊无法容纳引流管尺寸,置入不可行,该装置未进一步测试。对两只置入引流管的猫进行的CT扫描显示有中等量的游离腹腔造影剂,无胸腔穿透,有一处肝损伤。在4.5厘米水柱压力时发生渗漏。对于所有引流管,解剖过程中记录的损伤部位为肝脏、胸腔和胆囊。大多数损伤被分类为轻度。
结论及相关性
使用测试的方法和装置,经皮置入胆囊造瘘引流管不可行。需要进一步研究以探讨猫的替代技术。