Suppr超能文献

通过定量磁共振成像比较异位灰质与正常灰质:一项横断面研究。

Comparison of ectopic versus normal gray matter via quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Luo Dan, Deng Zexiang, Deng Xinru, Xiao Xinlan

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Intelligent Medical Imaging of Jiangxi Key Laboratory, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):5151-5159. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1237. Epub 2025 May 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gray matter heterotopia (GMH) involves the abnormal migration of cortical neurons into the white matter and is often associated with epileptic seizures. Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging only provides the anatomical details of GMH, this study investigated the potential differences between GMH and normal gray matter (NGM) using arterial spin labeling (ASL) and magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC) quantitative techniques.

METHODS

Retrospective data collection was conducted on 32 cases of GMH at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between October 2022 and October 2023. Patients underwent T1 brain volume (BRAVO), T2 weight imaging, ASL, and MAGiC sequences. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) values with postlabeling delays of 1.5 s and 2.5 s in ASL, along with T1, T2, and proton density values in MAGiC sequences, were measured and normalized against those of normal white matter. Paired-sample -tests were applied to compare quantitative values between NGM and GMH before and after normalization.

RESULTS

The average CBF values of GMH with dual postlabeling delays (31.96 mL/100 g/min and 35.13 mL/100 g/min) were both significantly lower than those of NGM (52.69 mL/100 g/min and 56.93 mL/100 g/min) (P<0.001). After normalization with contralateral white matter CBF values, the difference remained significant (P<0.001). The differences in CBF values between GMH and NGM were not associated with the postlabeling delay (P=0.500). However, there were differences in T1 values between NGM and GMH before and after the normalization of MAGiC sequences (P<0.001), but no significant differences were observed in the T2 or proton density values before and after normalization (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

NGM and GMH demonstrate quantitative differences in the ASL and MAGiC sequences.

摘要

背景

灰质异位(GMH)涉及皮质神经元向白质的异常迁移,且常与癫痫发作相关。尽管传统磁共振成像仅能提供GMH的解剖细节,但本研究使用动脉自旋标记(ASL)和磁共振图像汇编(MAGiC)定量技术,探究了GMH与正常灰质(NGM)之间的潜在差异。

方法

回顾性收集了2022年10月至2023年10月期间南昌大学第二附属医院32例GMH患者的数据。患者接受了T1脑容积(BRAVO)、T2加权成像、ASL和MAGiC序列检查。测量了ASL中标记后延迟1.5秒和2.5秒时的脑血流量(CBF)值,以及MAGiC序列中的T1、T2和质子密度值,并以正常白质的值进行归一化。应用配对样本t检验比较归一化前后NGM和GMH的定量值。

结果

GMH在双重标记后延迟时的平均CBF值(31.96 mL/100 g/min和35.13 mL/100 g/min)均显著低于NGM的平均CBF值(52.69 mL/10 g/min和56.93 mL/100 g/min)(P<0.001)。用对侧白质CBF值进行归一化后,差异仍然显著(P<0.001)。GMH和NGM之间的CBF值差异与标记后延迟无关(P=0.500)。然而,在MAGiC序列归一化前后,NGM和GMH的T1值存在差异(P<0.001),但在归一化前后的T2或质子密度值方面未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

NGM和GMH在ASL和MAGiC序列中表现出定量差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验