Smith Rachel J, McMahan Vanessa M, McCann Nicole C, Kosakowski Sarah, Brennan Sarah, Marti Xochitl Luna, Walley Alexander Y, Coffin Phillip O
Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, One Boston Medical Center Place, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Center on Substance Use and Health, San Francisco Department of Public Health, 25 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2025 Jun 10;16:100351. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100351. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Non-fatal opioid overdoses that do not result in an emergency medical system (EMS), emergency department or hospital encounter are not tracked. We aimed to understand the proportion of non-fatal overdoses with and without a healthcare encounter.
We used data from the REpeated-dose Behavioral intervention to reduce Opioid Overdose inTervention (REBOOT) trial among opioid overdose survivors in San Francisco and Boston. Participants reported the number of non-fatal overdoses over the prior 4-months at baseline and follow-up visits over 16 months. We asked details about the three most recent overdoses, including naloxone administration, EMS attendance, transport to an emergency department, or hospitalization.
A total of 268 individuals completed 1163 assessments. Across the assessments, 150 participants reported a total of 504 overdoses. Complete details were collected for 384 of the overdose events. Naloxone was administered at 306 out of 384 (80 %) overdose events. EMS attended the scene in 177 out of 384 (46 %) of events, with naloxone administration occurring in 159 of these events (90 %); 130 of the 384 (34 %) events resulted in transportation to the emergency department, and only 18 (5 %) led to hospital admission.
Among opioid overdose survivors in urban settings, EMS were present at less than half of self-reported overdoses, emergency department visits occurred in about one third, and admission to the hospital occurred in one of twenty overdoses. Most overdoses involved naloxone administration, frequently by lay responders. Estimating non-fatal overdose prevalence should not rely solely on measures of EMS attendance, emergency department or hospital admissions.
未导致紧急医疗系统(EMS)、急诊科或医院就诊的非致命性阿片类药物过量情况未被追踪。我们旨在了解有医疗接触和无医疗接触的非致命性过量用药的比例。
我们使用了来自重复剂量行为干预以减少阿片类药物过量干预(REBOOT)试验的数据,该试验针对旧金山和波士顿的阿片类药物过量幸存者。参与者在基线以及16个月的随访中报告了过去4个月内非致命性过量用药的次数。我们询问了最近三次过量用药的详细情况,包括纳洛酮的使用、EMS到场、送往急诊科或住院情况。
共有268人完成了1163次评估。在这些评估中,150名参与者报告了总共504次过量用药情况。对384次过量用药事件收集了完整细节。在384次过量用药事件中的306次(80%)使用了纳洛酮。在384次事件中的177次(46%)EMS到场,其中159次(90%)使用了纳洛酮;384次事件中的130次(34%)被送往急诊科,只有18次(5%)导致住院。
在城市环境中的阿片类药物过量幸存者中,自我报告的过量用药情况中不到一半有EMS到场,约三分之一出现急诊科就诊,二十分之一出现住院情况。大多数过量用药涉及纳洛酮的使用,通常由非专业急救人员进行。估计非致命性过量用药的患病率不应仅依赖于EMS到场、急诊科就诊或住院情况的衡量指标。