• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告症状在头颈部癌症复发检测中的应用:一项系统评价

Patient-reported symptoms in the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence: a systematic review.

作者信息

Hulse Kate, Hurley Rhona, Lowit Anja, Maguire Roma, Paterson Claire, Douglas Catriona M

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Glasgow Head and Neck Cancer (GLAHNC) Research Group, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1632592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1632592. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1632592
PMID:40606982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12213633/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) relies on the signs and symptoms of recurrence being detectable by patients. We examine the evidence for patient-reported symptoms as an indicator of recurrence.

METHODS

A search was conducted via OvidMEDLINE and Embase (2010 to January 2024) plus sources of grey literature for studies which describe patient-reported symptoms and recurrent disease. Findings are reported as per PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included which were highly heterogenous. The median sensitivity of patient-reported symptoms to detect recurrence is 47.3%. Median specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV) and negative-predictive value (NPV) were 79.3%, 9.3% and 98.0% respectively. New symptoms were generally reported at routine follow-up rather than expedited appointments.

CONCLUSION

The high specificity and NPV of patient-reported symptoms means recurrence is unlikely in the absence of symptoms. Patient education and collection of prospective data through digital health technologies may increase the effectiveness of PIFU.

摘要

引言

头颈癌(HNC)治疗后的患者自主随访(PIFU)依赖于患者能够察觉复发的体征和症状。我们研究了患者报告症状作为复发指标的证据。

方法

通过Ovid MEDLINE和Embase(2010年至2024年1月)以及灰色文献来源搜索描述患者报告症状和复发性疾病的研究。研究结果按照PRISMA指南报告。

结果

纳入了20项研究,这些研究具有高度异质性。患者报告症状检测复发的中位敏感性为47.3%。中位特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为79.3%、9.3%和98.0%。新症状通常在常规随访时报告,而非加急预约时。

结论

患者报告症状的高特异性和NPV意味着无症状时复发的可能性不大。通过数字健康技术进行患者教育和前瞻性数据收集可能会提高PIFU的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a694/12213633/607605ed2284/fonc-15-1632592-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a694/12213633/607605ed2284/fonc-15-1632592-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a694/12213633/607605ed2284/fonc-15-1632592-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient-reported symptoms in the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence: a systematic review.患者报告症状在头颈部癌症复发检测中的应用:一项系统评价
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1632592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1632592. eCollection 2025.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Patient initiated follow up in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A systematic review.患者主导的妇产科随访:系统评价。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 May;272:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.181. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual-type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia.治疗寻常型外阴上皮内瘤变的医学和外科干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD011837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011837.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
PET-CT-guided, symptom-based, patient-initiated surveillance versus clinical follow-up in head neck cancer patients (PETNECK2): study protocol for a multicentre feasibility study and non-inferiority, randomised, phase III trial.PET-CT 引导、基于症状、患者发起的头颈部癌症患者监测与临床随访(PETNECK2):一项多中心可行性研究和非劣效性、随机、III 期试验的研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12470-9.
2
Head and Neck Cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines, Sixth Edition - ERRATUM.头颈癌:英国国家多学科指南,第六版 - 勘误表
J Laryngol Otol. 2024 Apr 29:1-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215124000628.
3
Value of routine follow-up for recurrence detection after treatment with curative intent for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
有治疗意图的喉鳞状细胞癌治疗后常规随访以检测复发的价值。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;50(1):107304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107304. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
A retrospective analysis: follow-up with FDG-PET/CT in oro- and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.一项回顾性分析:对头颈部下咽鳞状细胞癌患者进行FDG-PET/CT随访
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Sep 6:1-25. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001214.
5
A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient-initiated follow-up after cancer.患者主动发起癌症随访的效果的系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19057-19071. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6462. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
6
The timing and methods for detection of recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer.头颈部癌患者复发检测的时机和方法。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul-Aug;143(7):617-622. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2023.2237520. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
7
A multicenter randomized trial for quality of life evaluation by non-invasive intelligent tools during post-curative treatment follow-up for head and neck cancer: Clinical study protocol.一项关于头颈部癌症治愈后治疗随访期间通过非侵入性智能工具进行生活质量评估的多中心随机试验:临床研究方案。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 31;13:1048593. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1048593. eCollection 2023.
8
Value of routine follow-up in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer patients treated with curative intent.根治性治疗的口咽鳞状细胞癌患者常规随访的价值。
Head Neck. 2023 Mar;45(3):586-594. doi: 10.1002/hed.27269. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
9
Tumor Recurrence and Follow-Up Intervals in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌的肿瘤复发与随访间隔
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 29;11(23):7061. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237061.
10
Osteoradionecrosis versus Cancer Recurrence: An Unresolved Clinical Dilemma.放射性骨坏死与癌症复发:一个尚未解决的临床难题。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2023;85(1):28-35. doi: 10.1159/000527261. Epub 2022 Dec 1.