• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人工智能的手术部位感染影像学检测

Imaging-based Surgical Site Infection Detection Using Artificial Intelligence.

作者信息

Muaddi Hala, Choudhary Ashok, Lee Frank, Anderson Stephanie S, Habermann Elizabeth, Etzioni David, McLaughlin Sarah, Kendrick Michael, Salehinejad Hojjat, Thiels Cornelius

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2025 Sep 1;282(3):419-428. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006826. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006826
PMID:40607706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12341749/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop an artificial intelligence-based pipeline to assess and triage patient-submitted postoperative wound images.

BACKGROUND

The rise of outpatient surgeries, remote monitoring, and patient-submitted wound images via online portals has contributed to a growing administrative workload on clinicians. Early identification of surgical site infection (SSI) is essential for reducing postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years old who underwent surgery at 9 affiliated Mayo Clinic hospitals (2019-2022) and were captured by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) were included. Eligibility required submission of one image via the patient portal within 30 days after surgery. Images were independently screened in duplicate to determine the presence of an incision. SSI outcomes were obtained from NSQIP. The developed model consisted of 2 stages: incision detection and SSI detection in images with incisions. Four pretrained architectures were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, with upsampling and data augmentation to mitigate class imbalance. An end-to-end pipeline, image quality assessment and sensitivity analysis stratified by race were also performed.

RESULTS

Among 6060 patients, the median age was 54 years (interquartile range: 40-65), 61.4% (n=3805) were female, and 92.5% (n=5731) identified as White. SSIs were confirmed in 6.2% (n=386) images. Vision Transformer outperformed all others, achieving an incision detection accuracy of 0.94 (area under the curve=0.98) and an SSI detection accuracy of 0.73 (area under the curve=0.81). In addition, it demonstrated strong performance in assessing image quality. Sensitivity analysis revealed comparable performance across racial subgroups.

CONCLUSION

This artificial intelligence pipeline demonstrates promising performance in automating wound image assessment and SSI detection, reducing clinical workload and improving postoperative care.

摘要

目的

开发一种基于人工智能的流程,用于评估和分类患者提交的术后伤口图像。

背景

门诊手术、远程监测以及患者通过在线门户提交伤口图像的兴起,增加了临床医生的行政工作量。早期识别手术部位感染(SSI)对于降低术后发病率至关重要。

方法

纳入2019年至2022年在梅奥诊所9家附属医院接受手术且被纳入国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)的18岁及以上患者。入选条件要求患者在术后30天内通过患者门户提交一张图像。图像由两人独立重复筛选以确定是否存在切口。SSI结局数据来自NSQIP。所开发的模型包括两个阶段:切口检测以及对有切口的图像进行SSI检测。使用10折交叉验证对四种预训练架构进行评估,并采用上采样和数据增强来减轻类别不平衡问题。还进行了端到端流程、图像质量评估以及按种族分层的敏感性分析。

结果

在6060例患者中,中位年龄为54岁(四分位间距:40 - 65岁),61.4%(n = 3805)为女性,92.5%(n = 5731)为白人。6.2%(n = 386)的图像确诊为SSI。视觉Transformer的表现优于其他所有架构,切口检测准确率达到0.94(曲线下面积 = 0.98),SSI检测准确率为0.73(曲线下面积 = 0.81)。此外,它在评估图像质量方面表现出色。敏感性分析显示不同种族亚组的表现相当。

结论

这种人工智能流程在自动化伤口图像评估和SSI检测方面表现出了良好的性能,可减轻临床工作量并改善术后护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec3b/12341749/8a8040f01c9b/sla-282-419-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec3b/12341749/9bec95d7f188/sla-282-419-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec3b/12341749/4694d5b0f601/sla-282-419-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec3b/12341749/8a8040f01c9b/sla-282-419-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec3b/12341749/9bec95d7f188/sla-282-419-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec3b/12341749/4694d5b0f601/sla-282-419-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec3b/12341749/8a8040f01c9b/sla-282-419-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Imaging-based Surgical Site Infection Detection Using Artificial Intelligence.基于人工智能的手术部位感染影像学检测
Ann Surg. 2025 Sep 1;282(3):419-428. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006826. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Artificial intelligence for diagnosing exudative age-related macular degeneration.人工智能在渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 17;10(10):CD015522. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015522.pub2.
4
Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.腔内灌洗和伤口冲洗预防手术部位感染
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2.
5
Artificial Intelligence-Based prediction model for surgical site infection in metastatic spinal disease: a multicenter development and validation study.基于人工智能的转移性脊柱疾病手术部位感染预测模型:一项多中心开发与验证研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002806.
6
Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.预防手术部位感染的术中干预措施:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD012653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012653.pub2.
7
Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.预防接受心脏手术的成人手术部位感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 2;12(12):CD013332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013332.pub2.
8
Topical antibiotics for preventing surgical site infection in wounds healing by primary intention.用于预防一期愈合伤口手术部位感染的局部用抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):CD011426. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011426.pub2.
9
Does the Application of Topical Vancomycin Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.局部万古霉素应用是否能降低脊柱手术部位感染?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2212-2219. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003179. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal machine learning to predict surgical site infection with healthcare workload impact assessment.用于通过医疗保健工作量影响评估预测手术部位感染的多模态机器学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 23;8(1):121. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01419-8.
2
Wound imaging software and digital platform to assist review of surgical wounds using patient smartphones: The development and evaluation of artificial intelligence (WISDOM AI study).使用患者智能手机辅助手术伤口评估的伤口成像软件和数字平台:人工智能的开发与评估(WISDOM人工智能研究)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0315384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315384. eCollection 2024.
3
Prevalence of Surgery Among Individuals in the United States.
美国个体中接受手术的比例。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Apr 11;5(2):e421. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000421. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Image-based digital post-discharge surveillance in England: measuring patient enrolment, engagement, clinician response times, surgical site infection, and carbon footprint.英格兰基于图像的出院后数字监测:衡量患者登记、参与度、临床医生响应时间、手术部位感染和碳足迹。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Mar;133:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Postsurgical Remote Patient Monitoring Outcomes and Perceptions: A Mixed-Methods Assessment.术后远程患者监测结果与认知:一项混合方法评估
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 Oct 21;6(6):574-583. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.09.005. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Surgical site infection metrics: Dissecting the differences between the National Health and Safety Network and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.手术部位感染指标:剖析国家卫生与安全网络与国家外科质量改进计划之间的差异。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 26;1(1):e16. doi: 10.1017/ash.2021.176. eCollection 2021.
7
Postoperative complications: an observational study of trends in the United States from 2012 to 2018.术后并发症:2012 年至 2018 年美国的趋势观察研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01392-z.
8
Mobile health technology for remote home monitoring after surgery: a meta-analysis.移动医疗技术在术后远程家庭监测中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Nov 11;108(11):1304-1314. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab323.
9
Trends in Electronic Health Record Inbox Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Ambulatory Practice Network in New England.在新英格兰地区的一个门诊实践网络中,COVID-19 大流行期间电子健康记录收件箱消息的趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2131490. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31490.
10
Development and Validation of Image-Based Deep Learning Models to Predict Surgical Complexity and Complications in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.基于图像的深度学习模型用于预测腹壁重建手术复杂性和并发症的开发与验证
JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):933-940. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3012.