• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北欧国家工作预期寿命和工作年限损失的职业差异。

Occupational differences in working life expectancy and working years lost in Nordic countries.

作者信息

Undem Karina, Leinonen Taina, Falkstedt Daniel, Johansson Gun, Pedersen Jacob, Viikari-Juntura Eira, Mehlum Ingrid Sivesind, Solovieva Svetlana

机构信息

National Institute of Occupational Health, Department of Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, PB 5330 Majorstuen, 0304 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 Sep 1;51(5):423-432. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4239. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4239
PMID:40607777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414609/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Risk of exit from work is both occupation- and country-specific. This study investigated occupational differences in working life expectancy (WLE) and reasons for working years lost (WYL) among employed workers in three Nordic countries.

METHODS

We utilized registry-based cohorts of the employed population in Denmark (N=2 383 657), Finland (N=1 266 705) and Norway (N=1 761 166) to estimate WLE for ages 30-65 using the Sullivan method with 2015 data. We further estimated WYL due to sickness absence, unemployment, disability retirement, old-age retirement and other reasons. The analyses were stratified by gender and major occupational group (1st digit in the ISCO-88 code).

RESULTS

Occupational differences in WLE and WYL were observed in all countries. The overall pattern across the countries showed that legislators, senior officials and managers and professionals generally had high WLE, while service and sales workers and employees in manual occupations tended to have lower WLE, with employees in elementary occupations performing the worst. Reasons for WYL varied with country. In general, disability retirement was a significant factor in Denmark, unemployment in Finland, and sickness absence in Norway.

CONCLUSION

A similar occupational pattern in WLE was observed across the countries, with some occupational groups consistently showing high or low WLE. However, the magnitude of occupational differences in WLE and the reasons for WYL varied across the countries.

摘要

目的

离职风险因职业和国家而异。本研究调查了三个北欧国家在职员工工作预期寿命(WLE)的职业差异以及工作年限损失(WYL)的原因。

方法

我们利用丹麦(N = 2383657)、芬兰(N = 1266705)和挪威(N = 1761166)基于登记的就业人群队列,采用沙利文方法,利用2015年数据估计30至65岁人群的WLE。我们还进一步估计了因疾病缺勤、失业、残疾退休、老年退休和其他原因导致的WYL。分析按性别和主要职业组(国际标准职业分类-88代码的第一位数字)分层。

结果

所有国家均观察到WLE和WYL的职业差异。各国的总体模式表明,立法者、高级官员和经理以及专业人员的WLE通常较高,而服务和销售工人以及体力职业的雇员WLE往往较低,其中从事基础职业的雇员表现最差。WYL的原因因国家而异。总体而言,残疾退休在丹麦是一个重要因素,失业在芬兰是重要因素,疾病缺勤在挪威是重要因素。

结论

各国在WLE方面观察到类似的职业模式,一些职业群体的WLE始终较高或较低。然而,WLE的职业差异程度以及WYL的原因在各国有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9362/12414609/2e06cdab7224/SJWEH-51-423-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9362/12414609/c9df4488674d/SJWEH-51-423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9362/12414609/44ca9ebd393d/SJWEH-51-423-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9362/12414609/2e06cdab7224/SJWEH-51-423-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9362/12414609/c9df4488674d/SJWEH-51-423-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9362/12414609/44ca9ebd393d/SJWEH-51-423-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9362/12414609/2e06cdab7224/SJWEH-51-423-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Occupational differences in working life expectancy and working years lost in Nordic countries.北欧国家工作预期寿命和工作年限损失的职业差异。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 Sep 1;51(5):423-432. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4239. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
2
The influence of occupational class and physical workload on working life expectancy among older employees.职业阶层和体力工作负荷对老年员工工作预期寿命的影响。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):5-14. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3919. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
Working years lost in people with epilepsy: a population-based cohort study.癫痫患者的工作年限损失:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 16;96(8):784-793. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-335220.
4
Concurrent trajectories of occupational groups and sustainable working life-a Swedish twin cohort study over 16 years.职业群体与可持续工作生活的并发轨迹——一项为期16年的瑞典双胞胎队列研究
Ind Health. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2024-0205.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Evaluating quick return restrictions on sickness absence in healthcare employees: A difference-in-differences study.评估医疗保健员工病假快速返回限制:一项双重差分研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Mar;163:104996. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.104996. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
7
Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis.预防职业性刺激性手部皮炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 30;4(4):CD004414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004414.pub3.
8
The aftermath of COVID-19: Mortality impact of the pandemic on older persons in Sweden and other Nordic countries, 2020-2023.新冠疫情的后果:2020 - 2023年大流行对瑞典及其他北欧国家老年人的死亡率影响
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Jun 10:14034948241253339. doi: 10.1177/14034948241253339.
9
Socioeconomic position and risk of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: Results from the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study.北欧国家的社会经济地位与宫颈癌风险:北欧职业性癌症研究结果
Int J Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;157(1):95-102. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35349. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
10
'Skeletal Age' for mapping the impact of fracture on mortality.“骨骼年龄”用于评估骨折对死亡率的影响。
Elife. 2023 May 16;12:e83888. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83888.

本文引用的文献

1
Narrative review of occupational exposures and noncommunicable diseases.职业暴露与非传染性疾病的叙述性综述。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jul 8;68(6):562-580. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae045.
2
Gender and educational differences in work participation and working years lost in Norway.挪威的工作参与度和工作年限损失中的性别和教育差异。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Sep 1;50(6):426-436. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4166. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
Socioeconomic differences in working life expectancy: a scoping review.社会经济差异对预期工作寿命的影响:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18229-y.
4
The Extension of Late Working Life in Germany: Trends, Inequalities, and the East-West Divide.德国延迟工作寿命的延长:趋势、不平等以及东西德差距。
Demography. 2023 Aug 1;60(4):1115-1137. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10850040.
5
Utilizing a Nordic Crosswalk for Occupational Coding in an Analysis on Occupation-Specific Prolonged Sickness Absence among 7 Million Employees in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.利用北欧交叉法对丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典 700 万员工的职业特异性长期病假进行分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15674. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315674.
6
Healthy and unhealthy working-life expectancy: opportunities and challenges.健康与非健康工作预期寿命:机遇与挑战。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Oct;2(10):e604-e605. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00211-7. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
The influence of chronic diseases and poor working conditions in working life expectancy across educational levels among older employees in the Netherlands.荷兰老年员工中,受慢性病和较差工作条件影响,不同教育程度者的工作预期寿命存在差异。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Jul 1;48(5):391-398. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4028. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Live longer, retire later? Developments of healthy life expectancies and working life expectancies between age 50-59 and age 60-69 in Europe.活得更长,推迟退休?欧洲50 - 59岁和60 - 69岁人群健康预期寿命和工作预期寿命的发展情况。
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Dec 3;19(1):75-93. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00592-5. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Indicators and determinants of the years of working life lost: a narrative review.工作寿命损失的指标和决定因素:叙述性综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Aug;49(6):666-674. doi: 10.1177/1403494821993669. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
10
The influence of occupational class and physical workload on working life expectancy among older employees.职业阶层和体力工作负荷对老年员工工作预期寿命的影响。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):5-14. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3919. Epub 2020 Sep 1.