• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国国际开发署二十年干预措施的影响,并预测到2030年停止资金投入对死亡率的影响:一项回顾性影响评估与预测分析。

Evaluating the impact of two decades of USAID interventions and projecting the effects of defunding on mortality up to 2030: a retrospective impact evaluation and forecasting analysis.

作者信息

Cavalcanti Daniella Medeiros, de Oliveira Ferreira de Sales Lucas, da Silva Andrea Ferreira, Basterra Elisa Landin, Pena Daiana, Monti Caterina, Barreix Gonzalo, Silva Natanael J, Vaz Paula, Saute Francisco, Fanjul Gonzalo, Bassat Quique, Naniche Denise, Macinko James, Rasella Davide

机构信息

Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.

ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain; Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Lancet. 2025 Jul 19;406(10500):283-294. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01186-9. Epub 2025 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01186-9
PMID:40609560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12274115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid worldwide. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the effect of all USAID funding on adult and child mortality over the past two decades and forecast the future effect of its defunding.

METHODS

In this retrospective impact evaluation integrated with forecasting analysis, we used panel data from 133 countries and territories- including all low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs)-with USAID support ranging from none to very high. First, we used fixed-effects multivariable Poisson models with robust SEs adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-care factors to estimate the impact of USAID funding on all-age and all-cause mortality from 2001 to 2021. Second, we evaluated its effects by age-specific, sex-specific, and cause-specific groups. Third, we did several sensitivity and triangulation analyses. Lastly, we integrated the retrospective evaluation with validated dynamic microsimulation models to estimate effects up to 2030.

FINDINGS

Higher levels of USAID funding-primarily directed toward LMICs, particularly African countries-were associated with a 15% reduction in age-standardised all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·78-0·93) and a 32% reduction in under-five mortality (RR 0·68, 0·57-0·80). This finding indicates that 91 839 663 (95% CI 85 690 135-98 291 626) all-age deaths, including 30 391 980 (26 023 132-35 482 636) in children younger than 5 years, were prevented by USAID funding over the 21-year study period. USAID funding was associated with a 65% reduction (RR 0·35, 0·29-0·42) in mortality from HIV/AIDS (representing 25·5 million deaths), 51% (RR 0·49, 0·39-0·61) from malaria (8·0 million deaths), and 50% (RR 0·50, 0·40-0·62) from neglected tropical diseases (8·9 million deaths). Significant decreases were also observed in mortality from tuberculosis, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and maternal and perinatal conditions. Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990-19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796-5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.

INTERPRETATION

USAID funding has significantly contributed to the reduction in adult and child mortality across low-income and middle-income countries over the past two decades. Our estimates show that, unless the abrupt funding cuts announced and implemented in the first half of 2025 are reversed, a staggering number of avoidable deaths could occur by 2030.

FUNDING

The Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, UK Medical Research Council, and EU Horizon Europe.

摘要

背景

美国国际开发署(USAID)是全球最大的人道主义和发展援助资金机构。本研究的目的是全面评估过去二十年来美国国际开发署所有资金对成人和儿童死亡率的影响,并预测其资金削减的未来影响。

方法

在这项结合预测分析的回顾性影响评估中,我们使用了来自133个国家和地区的面板数据,包括所有低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC),美国国际开发署的支持程度从无到非常高。首先,我们使用固定效应多变量泊松模型,并对人口、社会经济和医疗保健因素调整稳健标准误,以估计2001年至2021年美国国际开发署资金对全年龄段和全病因死亡率的影响。其次,我们按年龄、性别和病因特定组评估其影响。第三,我们进行了多项敏感性和三角测量分析。最后,我们将回顾性评估与经过验证的动态微观模拟模型相结合,以估计到2030年的影响。

结果

美国国际开发署的较高资金水平——主要针对低收入和中等收入国家,特别是非洲国家——与年龄标准化全病因死亡率降低15%(风险比[RR]0.85,95%置信区间0.78 - 0.93)和五岁以下儿童死亡率降低32%(RR 0.68,0.57 - 0.80)相关。这一发现表明,在21年的研究期间,美国国际开发署的资金预防了91839663例(95%置信区间85690135 - 98291626)全年龄段死亡,其中包括30391980例(26023132 - 35482636)五岁以下儿童死亡。美国国际开发署资金与艾滋病毒/艾滋病死亡率降低65%(RR 0.35,0.29 - 0.42)(相当于2550万例死亡)、疟疾死亡率降低51%(RR 0.49,0.39 - 0.61)(800万例死亡)以及被忽视热带病死亡率降低50%(RR 0.50,0.40 - 0.62)(890万例死亡)相关。结核病、营养缺乏、腹泻病、下呼吸道感染以及孕产妇和围产期疾病的死亡率也显著下降。预测模型预测,目前大幅削减资金可能导致到2030年额外增加超过14051750例(不确定区间8475990 - 19662191)全年龄段死亡,其中包括4537

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a746/12274115/d99ce958ec87/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a746/12274115/4810551175da/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a746/12274115/d99ce958ec87/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a746/12274115/4810551175da/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a746/12274115/d99ce958ec87/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of two decades of USAID interventions and projecting the effects of defunding on mortality up to 2030: a retrospective impact evaluation and forecasting analysis.评估美国国际开发署二十年干预措施的影响,并预测到2030年停止资金投入对死亡率的影响:一项回顾性影响评估与预测分析。
Lancet. 2025 Jul 19;406(10500):283-294. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01186-9. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Health effects of the Brazilian Conditional Cash Transfer programme over 20 years and projections to 2030: a retrospective analysis and modelling study.巴西有条件现金转移支付计划20年的健康影响及到2030年的预测:一项回顾性分析与建模研究
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Jul;10(7):e548-e558. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00091-X. Epub 2025 May 29.
3
Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five.五岁以下儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD010123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010123.pub2.
4
The impact of aid sanctions on maternal and child mortality, 1990-2019: a panel analysis.1990 - 2019年援助制裁对孕产妇和儿童死亡率的影响:一项面板分析
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 May;13(5):e820-e830. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00058-0. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
5
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19: Equity-related analyses and update on evidence.全身性皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19:与公平相关的分析和证据更新。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Undernutrition as a risk factor for tuberculosis disease.营养不良是结核病的一个风险因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 11;6(6):CD015890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015890.pub2.
9
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
10
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.为照顾居住在长期护理机构中的60岁及以上老人的医护人员接种流感疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 27;2(2):CD005187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6.

引用本文的文献

1
Global distribution of research efforts, disease burden, and impact of US public funding withdrawal.研究工作的全球分布、疾病负担以及美国公共资金撤回的影响。
Nat Med. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03923-0.
2
Self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health: a strategic health systems investment.性与生殖健康的自我保健干预措施:一项战略性卫生系统投资。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 27;10(Suppl 6):e019030. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019030.
3
The new administration in the USA: impact of policy changes in development assistance on low- and middle-income countries, with the example of Nepal.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the potential malaria morbidity and mortality avertable by the US President's Malaria Initiative in 2025: a geospatial modelling analysis.估算美国总统疟疾防治倡议在2025年可避免的潜在疟疾发病率和死亡率:一项地理空间建模分析。
Lancet. 2025 Jun 21;405(10496):2231-2240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00805-0.
2
Impact of an international HIV funding crisis on HIV infections and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study.国际艾滋病病毒资金危机对低收入和中等收入国家艾滋病病毒感染及死亡率的影响:一项建模研究
Lancet HIV. 2025 May;12(5):e346-e354. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(25)00074-8. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
3
美国新政府:以尼泊尔为例,发展援助政策变化对低收入和中等收入国家的影响。
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2543103. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2543103. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
The full lethal impact of massive cuts to international food aid.
大幅削减国际粮食援助所带来的全面致命影响。
Nature. 2025 Apr;640(8057):35-37. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-00898-3.
4
Accounting for aid: estimating the impact of United States' global health investments on mortality among women of reproductive age using synthetic control and Bayesian methods.援助核算:运用合成控制法和贝叶斯方法评估美国全球卫生投资对育龄妇女死亡率的影响
J Glob Health. 2025 Mar 21;15:04067. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04067.
5
Can primary health care mitigate the effects of economic crises on child health in Latin America? An integrated multicountry evaluation and forecasting analysis.初级卫生保健能否减轻拉丁美洲经济危机对儿童健康的影响?一项多国家综合评估和预测分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Jun;12(6):e938-e946. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00094-9.
6
Current and Projected Mortality and Hospitalization Rates Associated With Conditional Cash Transfer, Social Pension, and Primary Health Care Programs in Brazil, 2000-2030.2000 - 2030年巴西有条件现金转移支付、社会养老金和初级卫生保健项目相关的当前及预计死亡率和住院率
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7519.
7
Effects of education on adult mortality: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.教育对成年人死亡率的影响:全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Mar;9(3):e155-e165. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00306-7. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
8
Evaluation and Forecasting Analysis of the Association of Conditional Cash Transfer With Child Mortality in Latin America, 2000-2030.评估和预测分析条件性现金转移与拉丁美洲儿童死亡率的关联,2000-2030 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323489. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23489.
9
The effects of cash transfers on adult and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries.现金转移对中低收入国家成人和儿童死亡率的影响。
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7965):575-582. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06116-2. Epub 2023 May 31.
10
Impact on childhood mortality of interventions to improve drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) to households: Systematic review and meta-analysis.改善家庭饮用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施对儿童死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 20;20(4):e1004215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004215. eCollection 2023 Apr.