Hook Sophia, Netsch Christopher, Gross Andreas J, Rosenbaum Clemens M, Filmar Simon, Engel Oliver, Wülfing Christian, Becker Benedikt
Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Urologie, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Aktuelle Urol. 2025 Sep;56(5):456-463. doi: 10.1055/a-2631-7343. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) is an established surgical technique for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and is increasingly adopted in clinical practice. This study aimed to prospectively compare intraoperative and long-term outcomes of AEEP in patients with prostate volumes below and above 100 ml. Key parameters included intraoperative conversion rates, 90-day complication rates, and 3-year follow-up data on reoperation rates, patient satisfaction, and involuntary urinary leakage.We analysed data from a prospective, multicentre registry of patients who underwent AEEP for BPH. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (<100 ml) and Group 2 (>100 ml). Preoperative parameters such as age, prostate volume, and symptom severity were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurring within a 90-day period were documented. The 3-year follow-up included an assessment of reoperation rates, patient satisfaction, and incontinence rate (defined as the daily use of incontinence pads).A total of 1,653 patients were included, with 1,251 assigned to Group 1 and 396 to Group 2. There were no significant differences in age or symptom severity between the groups, with the median prostate volume being 54 ml in Group 1 and 125 ml in Group 2. Intraoperative conversion rates were low in both groups (1.8% in Group 1 vs. 2.5% in Group 2). The 90-day complication rate, classified by the Clavien-Dindo system, was 40.1% in Group 1 and 52.4% in Group 2, with most complications being minor (Grade I-II). Severe complications (Grade III or higher) were rare and similarly distributed between the two groups. At 3 years, the reoperation rate was 9.1% in Group 1 and 6.4% in Group 2. Patient satisfaction remained high, with 82.3% in Group 1 and 90.5% in Group 2 reporting an improvement in quality of life two years postoperatively. The incidence of involuntary urinary leakage requiring the use of pads was 26% in Group 1 and 24.8% in Group 2 at the 3-year follow-up.This prospective, multicentre study demonstrates that AEEP is a safe and effective treatment for patients with BPH. The rate of urinary incontinence appears higher than that reported in the current literature, but it should be noted that not all cases constitute de novo incontinence. Both groups exhibited low intraoperative conversion rates, an acceptable complication profile, and comparable long-term outcomes with high patient satisfaction. These findings support the broad applicability of AEEP for both smaller and larger prostate volumes in clinical practice.
解剖性内镜下前列腺剜除术(AEEP)是一种成熟的治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的外科技术,在临床实践中应用越来越广泛。本研究旨在前瞻性比较前列腺体积小于和大于100ml的患者行AEEP的术中及长期疗效。关键参数包括术中中转率、90天并发症发生率以及再手术率、患者满意度和尿失禁的3年随访数据。我们分析了一个前瞻性、多中心的BPH患者AEEP登记研究的数据。患者分为两组:第1组(<100ml)和第2组(>100ml)。记录术前参数,如年龄、前列腺体积和症状严重程度。记录90天内发生的术中及术后并发症。3年随访包括对再手术率、患者满意度和尿失禁率(定义为每天使用尿失禁垫)的评估。共纳入1653例患者,其中1251例分配至第1组,396例分配至第2组。两组患者的年龄或症状严重程度无显著差异,第1组前列腺体积中位数为54ml,第2组为125ml。两组术中中转率均较低(第1组为1.8%,第2组为2.5%)。根据Clavien-Dindo系统分类,第1组90天并发症发生率为40.1%,第2组为52.4%,大多数并发症为轻度(I-II级)。严重并发症(III级或更高)罕见,且两组分布相似。3年时,第1组再手术率为9.1%,第2组为6.4%。患者满意度仍然很高,第1组82.3%、第2组90.5%的患者报告术后两年生活质量有所改善。3年随访时,第1组需要使用尿失禁垫的尿失禁发生率为26%,第2组为24.8%。这项前瞻性、多中心研究表明,AEEP对BPH患者是一种安全有效的治疗方法。尿失禁发生率似乎高于当前文献报道,但应注意并非所有病例均为新发尿失禁。两组术中中转率均较低,并发症情况可接受,长期疗效相当,患者满意度高。这些研究结果支持AEEP在临床实践中对较小和较大前列腺体积患者的广泛适用性。