Cho Min Soo, Kang Do-Yoon, Ahn Jung-Min, Yun Sung-Cheol, Oh Yong-Seog, Lee Chang Hoon, Choi Eue-Keun, Lee Ji Hyun, Kwon Chang Hee, Park Gyung-Min, Choi Hyung Oh, Park Kyoung-Ha, Park Kyoung-Min, Hwang Jongmin, Yoo Ki-Dong, Cho Young-Rak, Kim Ji Hyun, Hwang Ki Won, Jin Eun-Sun, Kwon Osung, Kim Ki-Hun, Park Seung-Jung, Park Duk-Woo, Nam Gi-Byoung
From the Department of Cardiology (M.S.C., D.-Y.K., J.-M.A., S.-J.P., D.-W.P., G.-B.N.) and the Division of Biostatics (S.-C.Y.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, the Department of Cardiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea (Y.-S.O.), the Department of Cardiology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center (C.H.L.), the Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital (E.-K.C.), the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine (C.H.K.), the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (K.-M.P.), the Department of Cardiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University Medical College (E.-S.J.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea (O.K.), Seoul, the Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam (J.H.L.), the Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan (G.-M.P.), the Department of Cardiology, Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Bucheon, Bucheon (H.O.C.), the Department of Cardiology, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang (K.-H.P.), the Department of Cardiology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu (J.H.), the Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Suwon (K.-D.Y.), the Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine (Y.-R.C.), and the Department of Cardiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine (K.-H.K.), Busan, the Department of Cardiology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang (J.H.K.), and the Department of Cardiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University of Medicine, Yangsan (K.W.H.) - all in South Korea.
N Engl J Med. 2024 Dec 5;391(22):2075-2086. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2407362. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
Despite consistent recommendations from clinical guidelines, data from randomized trials on a long-term antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease are still lacking.
We conducted a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-masked, randomized trial comparing edoxaban monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent) in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease (defined as coronary artery disease previously treated with revascularization or managed medically). The risk of stroke was assessed on the basis of the CHADS-VASc score (scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, and major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included a composite of major ischemic events and the safety outcome of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.
We assigned 524 patients to the edoxaban monotherapy group and 516 patients to the dual antithrombotic therapy group at 18 sites in South Korea. The mean age of the patients was 72.1 years, 22.9% were women, and the mean CHADS-VASc score was 4.3. At 12 months, a primary-outcome event had occurred in 34 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.8%) assigned to edoxaban monotherapy and in 79 patients (16.2%) assigned to dual antithrombotic therapy (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.65; P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of major ischemic events at 12 months appeared to be similar in the trial groups. Major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 23 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 4.7%) in the edoxaban monotherapy group and in 70 patients (14.2%) in the dual antithrombotic therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.53).
In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, edoxaban monotherapy led to a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, or major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months than dual antithrombotic therapy. (Funded by the CardioVascular Research Foundation and others; EPIC-CAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03718559.).
尽管临床指南给出了一致的建议,但关于心房颤动合并稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者长期抗血栓治疗策略的随机试验数据仍然缺乏。
我们进行了一项多中心、开放标签、裁决者盲法的随机试验,比较依度沙班单药治疗与双联抗血栓治疗(依度沙班加一种抗血小板药物)在心房颤动合并稳定型冠状动脉疾病(定义为先前接受过血运重建治疗或药物治疗的冠状动脉疾病)患者中的疗效。根据CHADS-VASc评分(评分范围为0至9,分数越高表明中风风险越大)评估中风风险。主要结局是12个月时任何原因导致的死亡、心肌梗死、中风、全身性栓塞、计划外紧急血运重建以及大出血或临床相关非大出血的复合结局。次要结局包括主要缺血事件的复合结局以及大出血或临床相关非大出血的安全性结局。
我们在韩国的18个地点将524例患者分配至依度沙班单药治疗组,516例患者分配至双联抗血栓治疗组。患者的平均年龄为72.1岁,女性占22.9%,平均CHADS-VASc评分为4.3。在12个月时,依度沙班单药治疗组有34例患者(Kaplan-Meier估计值为6.8%)发生主要结局事件,双联抗血栓治疗组有79例患者(16.2%)发生主要结局事件(风险比为0.44;95%置信区间[CI]为0.30至0.65;P<0.001)。12个月时主要缺血事件的累积发生率在试验组中似乎相似。依度沙班单药治疗组有23例患者(Kaplan-Meier估计值为4.7%)发生大出血或临床相关非大出血,双联抗血栓治疗组有70例患者(14.2%)发生大出血或临床相关非大出血(风险比为0.34;95%CI为0.22至0.53)。
在心房颤动合并稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中,与双联抗血栓治疗相比,依度沙班单药治疗在12个月时导致任何原因导致的死亡、心肌梗死、中风、全身性栓塞、计划外紧急血运重建或大出血或临床相关非大出血的复合结局风险更低。(由心血管研究基金会等资助;EPIC-CAD临床试验注册号,NCT03718559。)