Deliktas Demirci Ayse, Buyuk Alime, Kabukcuoglu Kamile
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Dumlupınar Bulvarı, Antalya, 07058, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06152-9.
Despite suggestions to handle comprehensive approach and integrate and various sectors and disciplines to address sexual health, discussions about sexuality in aging populations have largely centered on issues of sexual function. This study aimed to examine the effects of a positive sex education and pelvic floor strengthening program on youngest-old women’s sexual function, sexual esteem, and quality of sexual life as primary outcomes and pelvic floor health as a secondary outcome.
A parallel two arms randomized controlled trial was conducted, involving 70 youngest-old women (mean age = 65.80 ± 5.20). They were randomly assigned into two groups: (1) intervention group ( = 35) took positive sex education and pelvic floor strengthening program, and (2) waiting-list control group ( = 35) did not take any intervention related sexuality, but have received the treatment after fulfilling post-test evaluations. This study utilized self-reported and validated measures that were associated with outcomes. Effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated with using t-test.
The intervention group exhibited statistically significant changes in sexual function, self-esteem, and overall sexual quality of life when comparing the baseline and post-test assessments. The waiting-list control group showed no statistically significant changes in any of the measured outcomes when comparing baseline and post-test assessments. Post-test assessments between the two groups by controlling the impact levels of pelvic floor dysfunction revealed significant differences favoring the sexual health group in sexual function and all sub-parameters of pelvic floor dysfunction and their impact, with the exception of colorectal dysfunction. In addition, although women who participated in the program had increased sexual esteem and quality of sexual life compared to those in the waiting-list control group, the observed difference did not reach a level of statistical significance.
The sexual program which handled comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach could offer more than just addressing sexual function. Due to the unreached significant increase in sexual esteem and sexual quality of life and lack of knowledge about these, there is a need to have future studies. It is essential for national health policies to incorporate and act on interdisciplinary approach to sexuality in older adults.
This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT06539897 on 02.08.2024.
尽管有人建议采用综合方法,整合各个部门和学科来解决性健康问题,但关于老年人群体性方面的讨论主要集中在性功能问题上。本研究旨在探讨积极的性教育和盆底肌强化计划对年轻老年人(最年长的老年女性)性功能、性自尊和性生活质量的影响,并将盆底健康作为次要结果进行研究。
进行了一项平行双臂随机对照试验,纳入70名年轻老年人(平均年龄 = 65.80 ± 5.20岁)。她们被随机分为两组:(1)干预组(n = 35)接受积极的性教育和盆底肌强化计划,(2)等待名单对照组(n = 35)未接受任何与性相关的干预,但在完成测试后接受治疗。本研究采用与结果相关的自我报告和经过验证的测量方法。使用t检验评估干预的有效性。
与基线和测试后评估相比,干预组在性功能、自尊和总体性生活质量方面表现出统计学上的显著变化。等待名单对照组在比较基线和测试后评估时,在任何测量结果中均未显示出统计学上的显著变化。通过控制盆底功能障碍的影响水平,两组之间的测试后评估显示,除了结肠直肠功能障碍外,在性功能以及盆底功能障碍的所有子参数及其影响方面,性健康组存在显著差异。此外,尽管参与该计划的女性与等待名单对照组相比,性自尊和性生活质量有所提高,但观察到的差异未达到统计学显著水平。
采用综合和跨学科方法的性计划不仅可以解决性功能问题。由于性自尊和性生活质量未显著提高,且对此缺乏了解,因此有必要进行未来研究。国家卫生政策将跨学科的性方法纳入并采取行动至关重要。
本试验于2024年8月2日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符为NCT06539897。