Alemu Robel Z, Blakeman Alan, Fung Angela L, Hazen Melissa, Negandhi Jaina, Papsin Blake C, Cushing Sharon L, Gordon Karen A
Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251356333. doi: 10.1177/23312165251356333. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
Spatial hearing in children with bilateral cochlear implants (BCIs) was assessed by: (a) comparing localization of stationary and moving sound, (b) investigating the relationship between sound localization and sensitivity to interaural level and timing differences (ILDs/ITDs), (c) evaluating effects of aural preference on sound localization, and (d) exploring head and eye (gaze) movements during sound localization. Children with BCIs ( = 42, = 12.3 years) with limited duration of auditory deprivation and peers with typical hearing (controls; = 37, = 12.9 years) localized stationary and moving sound with unrestricted head and eye movements. Sensitivity to binaural cues was measured by a lateralization task to ILDs and ITDs. Spatial separation effects were measured by spondee-word recognition thresholds (SNR thresholds) when noise was presented in front (colocated/0°) or with 90° of left/right separation. BCI users had good speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in quiet but higher SRTs in noise than controls. Spatial separation of noise from speech revealed a greater advantage for the right ear across groups. BCI users showed increased errors localizing stationary sound and detecting moving sound direction compared to controls. Decreased ITD sensitivity occurred with poorer localization of stationary sound in BCI users. Gaze movements in BCI users were more random than controls for stationary and moving sounds. BCIs support symmetric hearing in children with limited duration of auditory deprivation and promote spatial hearing which is albeit impaired. Spatial hearing was thus considered to be "emerging." Remaining challenges may reflect disruptions in ITD sensitivity and ineffective gaze movements.
通过以下方式评估双侧人工耳蜗植入(BCI)儿童的空间听觉:(a)比较静止和移动声音的定位;(b)研究声音定位与双耳声级和时间差(ILDs/ITDs)敏感度之间的关系;(c)评估听觉偏好对声音定位的影响;(d)探索声音定位过程中的头部和眼睛(注视)运动。听觉剥夺时间有限的BCI儿童(n = 42,平均年龄 = 12.3岁)和听力正常的同龄人(对照组;n = 37,平均年龄 = 12.9岁)在头部和眼睛不受限制的情况下对静止和移动声音进行定位。通过对ILDs和ITDs的侧向化任务来测量对双耳线索的敏感度。当噪声在前方(同位置/0°)或左右分离90°时,通过扬扬格词识别阈值(SNR阈值)来测量空间分离效应。BCI使用者在安静环境中有良好的言语接受阈值(SRTs),但在噪声环境中的SRTs高于对照组。语音与噪声的空间分离显示,各组中右耳具有更大优势。与对照组相比,BCI使用者在定位静止声音和检测移动声音方向时错误增加。BCI使用者中,静止声音定位较差时ITD敏感度降低。对于静止和移动声音,BCI使用者的注视运动比对照组更随机。BCI为听觉剥夺时间有限的儿童提供对称听力,并促进空间听觉,尽管空间听觉受损。因此,空间听觉被认为是“正在形成的”。 remaining challenges may reflect disruptions in ITD sensitivity and ineffective gaze movements.(原文此处remaining首字母未大写,疑似有误,暂按原文翻译) 剩下的挑战可能反映出ITD敏感度的破坏和无效的注视运动。