Zhang Gelin, Zhang Ting, Zhang Xuyan, Guo Yurui, Fan Liying, Cheng Bin, Pei Leilei, Dong Jun
Department of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No 157, West Five Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No 157, West Five Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
J Orthop. 2025 Jun 17;65:283-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.015. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) using a titanium mesh cage (TMC) is associated with a high rate of subsidence. This study aims to evaluate the potential advantages of utilizing 3D-printed titanium vertebrae as an alternative to TMC in ACCF procedures.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ACCF at our hospital between March 2017 and June 2023. Patient demographics, surgical parameters (operation duration and blood loss), functional assessments (Barthel score, Morse Fall Scale (MFS), anterior cervical corpectomy index (aCCI)), hospitalization duration, costs, postoperative complications, unplanned reoperations, ICU admissions, and patient-reported outcomes (Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score) were recorded. Radiographic outcomes, including C2-C7 Cobb angles, segmental lordosis, and subsidence, were assessed via lateral cervical spine X-rays. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test.
A total of 92 patients were included in the study, with 48 patients in the 3D-vertebra group and 44 in the TMC group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The 3D-vertebra group demonstrated significantly shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, and improved functional scores compared to the TMC group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, the 3D-vertebra group exhibited lower JOA and VAS scores at both one-week and final follow-up. NDI scores were comparable at one week but were significantly higher in the TMC group at follow-up. While segmental lordosis remained similar between groups, C2-C7 Cobb angles showed significant differences at follow-up. The TMC group experienced an average subsidence of 2.5 mm, whereas the 3D-vertebra group had minimal subsidence.
The use of 3D-printed titanium vertebrae in ACCF surgery offers superior perioperative parameters, radiographic outcomes, and clinical scores compared to TMC implants. Further long-term studies are warranted to establish the extended benefits of 3D-printed vertebrae. Limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings, and prospective, randomized controlled studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.
使用钛网笼(TMC)进行颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)的下沉率较高。本研究旨在评估在ACCF手术中使用3D打印钛制椎体替代TMC的潜在优势。
对2017年3月至2023年6月期间在我院接受ACCF手术的患者进行回顾性分析。记录患者的人口统计学资料、手术参数(手术时间和失血量)、功能评估(Barthel评分、莫尔斯跌倒量表(MFS)、颈椎前路椎体次全切除指数(aCCI))、住院时间、费用、术后并发症、计划外再次手术、入住重症监护病房情况以及患者报告的结果(日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)评分)。通过颈椎侧位X线片评估影像学结果,包括C2-C7 Cobb角、节段性前凸和下沉情况。采用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验进行统计分析。
本研究共纳入92例患者,3D打印椎体组48例,TMC组44例。两组间基线特征具有可比性。与TMC组相比,3D打印椎体组手术时间显著缩短,失血量减少,功能评分改善(p < 0.05)。术后,3D打印椎体组在术后1周和最终随访时的JOA和VAS评分均较低。NDI评分在术后1周时相当,但在随访时TMC组显著更高。虽然两组间节段性前凸保持相似,但在随访时C2-C7 Cobb角存在显著差异。TMC组平均下沉2.5毫米,而3D打印椎体组下沉极小。
与TMC植入物相比,在ACCF手术中使用3D打印钛制椎体可提供更好的围手术期参数、影像学结果和临床评分。有必要进行进一步的长期研究以确定其长期益处。在解释研究结果时应考虑局限性,并且需要进行前瞻性随机对照研究以验证我们的结论。