Piscitello Gina M, Wolwowicz Edlyn Lopez, Huber Michael T, Vranas Kelly C, Sullivan Donald R, Hauschildt Katrina E, Lyons Patrick G
Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Pittsburgh, PA; Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Chest. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.036.
There is considerable variation in clinicians' approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw life sustaining treatment (LST) across US hospitals. These differences are not explained by patient preferences alone and are likely influenced by other factors (eg, hospital policies, hospital culture, state laws, medical society guidelines).
How do hospital policies influence clinician approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw LST among patients admitted to an ICU?
We conducted semistructured interviews with ICU nurses and physicians at 3 geographically diverse hospital systems across the United States between July and October 2024. We asked clinicians about their experiences with, and perceptions of, hospital policies on withholding or withdrawing LST and the relationship between these policies and clinician decision-making in ethically challenging scenarios.
We interviewed 10 nurses and 8 attending physicians with a median of 5 years (range, 2-36 years) in practice. Clinicians described limited awareness of, and familiarity with, their hospital's policies that addressed withholding or withdrawing LST. Clinicians with knowledge of these policies could identify their location but described barriers to accessing them. Although clinicians perceived hospital policies as helpful in some ways (eg, legal protection, ethical guidance), they viewed them as neither acknowledging nor addressing sociodemographic disparities or clinician value judgments in LST decision-making. Perceptions varied about whether clinicians followed their own hospital policy guidance when making decisions to withhold or withdraw LST.
Clinicians lack detailed understanding about their hospitals' policies that address withholding or withdrawing LST and perceive these policies as having limited applicability to clinical practice. These findings suggest that hospital policies may have little influence on clinician behavior in addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw LST in ethically challenging scenarios.
在美国各医院中,临床医生在决定停止或撤销维持生命治疗(LST)时采取的方法存在很大差异。这些差异不能仅由患者偏好来解释,很可能受到其他因素的影响(例如医院政策、医院文化、州法律、医学协会指南)。
医院政策如何影响重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者的临床医生做出停止或撤销LST的决定?
2024年7月至10月期间,我们在美国3个地理位置不同的医院系统对ICU护士和医生进行了半结构化访谈。我们询问临床医生关于他们对医院停止或撤销LST政策的经历和看法,以及这些政策与在伦理挑战性场景中临床医生决策之间的关系。
我们采访了10名护士和8名主治医生,他们的执业年限中位数为5年(范围为2至36年)。临床医生表示对所在医院关于停止或撤销LST的政策了解有限且不够熟悉。了解这些政策的临床医生能够说出其所在位置,但描述了获取这些政策时存在的障碍。尽管临床医生认为医院政策在某些方面有帮助(例如法律保护、伦理指导),但他们认为这些政策既未承认也未解决社会人口统计学差异或LST决策中的临床医生价值判断问题。对于临床医生在做出停止或撤销LST的决定时是否遵循自己医院的政策指导,看法不一。
临床医生对所在医院关于停止或撤销LST的政策缺乏详细了解,并认为这些政策在临床实践中的适用性有限。这些发现表明,在伦理挑战性场景中,医院政策可能对临床医生处理停止或撤销LST的决策行为影响甚微。