Turky Mohammed, Hamdy Shaimaa, Elhady Soha
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Agricultural Misr-Aswan Road, Minia, Egypt.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sphinx University, Assiut, Egypt.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06493-2.
To evaluate the antibacterial effectiveness of stepwise intraoperative activation of the root canal irrigant, both alone and when combined with conventional ultrasonic activation, compared to the traditional syringe irrigation method in oval root canals.
Sixty single-rooted maxillary second premolars were selected according to specific criteria. After creating an access opening and root canal patency in all samples, a cycle of autoclave sterilization was conducted. Enterococcus faecalis suspension was inoculated into the root canals and incubated at 37 °C for 21 days. After bacterial contamination, the specimens were assigned to four experimental groups (n = 10 per group): conventional syringe irrigation (CSI); stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA), consisting of the ultrasonic activation of 2 mL of 5.25% NaOCl solution for 20 s following irrigation between instrumentation files; conventional ultrasonic irrigation (CUI), consisting of the passive intermittent ultrasonic activation of 2 mL of 5.25% NaOCl in three successive cycles of 20 s each at the end of the mechanical instrumentation; and stepwise intraoperative activation plus conventional ultrasonic irrigation (SIA + CUI), consisting of a combination of SIA and CUI; in addition to positive control; and negative control groups (n = 10). At the end of the chemo-mechanical preparation, a bacterial sampling was conducted to determine the number of colony-forming units per mL (CFU//mL), and the outcomes were compared with one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc test with the significance level set at 5%.
None of the tested irrigation protocols were able to fully eliminate the intracanal bacterial infection. However, all protocols succeeded in reducing the bacterial burden within the oval root canals considerably (p <.05). The combination of SIA and CUI achieved the greatest bacterial reduction (1.85 ± 0.99), followed by the CUI (3.00 ± 0.13), SIA (3.54 ± 0.26), and CSI (4.29 ± 0.16) groups, respectively, with significant differences between them (p <.05).
Stepwise intraoperative irrigant activation was able to reduce the bacterial load in the oval root canals significantly compared to the basic chemo-mechanical preparation, with maximal disinfection achieved when combined with conventional ultrasonic irrigation.
The complex morphology of oval root canals presents significant challenges for effective disinfection during root canal treatment. To optimize the disinfection process, it would be essential to implement supplementary techniques in conjunction with standard root canal preparation. Employing a stepwise intraoperative irrigation activation method can enhance disinfection efficacy in these convoluted anatomies, particularly when integrated with traditional ultrasonic irrigation, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes.
Non-applicable. Conducting the current experiment was limited to the approval of the local Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Egypt (Committee No. 105, registration No. 903).
评估逐步术中激活根管冲洗剂单独使用以及与传统超声激活联合使用时,相较于传统注射器冲洗法在椭圆形根管中的抗菌效果。
根据特定标准选取60颗单根上颌第二前磨牙。在所有样本上制备开髓孔并使根管通畅后,进行一轮高压灭菌。将粪肠球菌悬液接种到根管中,于37℃孵育21天。细菌污染后,将标本分为四个实验组(每组n = 10):传统注射器冲洗(CSI);逐步术中激活(SIA),即在器械操作之间冲洗后,对2 mL 5.25%次氯酸钠溶液进行20秒的超声激活;传统超声冲洗(CUI),即在机械预备结束时,对2 mL 5.25%次氯酸钠进行三个连续20秒周期的被动间歇超声激活;逐步术中激活加传统超声冲洗(SIA + CUI),即SIA和CUI联合使用;此外还有阳性对照组和阴性对照组(n = 10)。在化学机械预备结束时,进行细菌采样以确定每毫升菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)的数量,并采用单因素方差分析和Games-Howell事后检验比较结果,显著性水平设定为5%。
所有测试的冲洗方案均无法完全消除根管内细菌感染。然而,所有方案均成功显著降低了椭圆形根管内的细菌负荷(p <.05)。SIA和CUI联合使用实现了最大程度的细菌减少(1.85 ± 0.99),其次分别是CUI组(3.00 ± 0.13)、SIA组(3.54 ± 0.26)和CSI组(4.29 ± 0.16),它们之间存在显著差异(p <.05)。
与基本的化学机械预备相比,逐步术中冲洗剂激活能够显著降低椭圆形根管内的细菌负荷,与传统超声冲洗联合使用时可实现最大程度的消毒。
椭圆形根管的复杂形态给根管治疗期间的有效消毒带来了重大挑战。为优化消毒过程,结合标准根管预备实施辅助技术至关重要。采用逐步术中冲洗激活方法可提高这些复杂解剖结构中的消毒效果,特别是与传统超声冲洗结合使用时,可能会改善治疗效果。
不适用。本实验的开展仅限于获得埃及米尼亚大学牙科学院当地研究伦理委员会的批准(委员会编号105,注册编号903)。