Gao Tianyu, Shi Peng, Zhang Duoyao, Wang Guodong, Zhang Jianming
School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
School of Physical Education, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255000, China.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul 5;17(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01231-1.
To quantitatively access the visual search of soccer players in the 3V3 offensive tactical situation and explore the eye movement characteristics and information processing mechanisms of high-level athletes under multi-target tracking.
Using the expert-novice research paradigm, eight second-level soccer players were selected as the expert group, and eight university students majoring in soccer were selected as the novice group. Real match 3V3 offensive tactical scenarios were used as stimulus materials. The Dikablis Professional head-mounted eye tracker with D-lab software was used to record and process the participants’ eye movement data and decision-making agility data. Experts were invited to independently score the reasonableness of offensive tactical decision-making data. Independent samples -tests were conducted for intergroup comparison analysis on SPSS 25.0 software.
The tactical decision-making agility and rationality of the expert group were significantly higher than those of the novice group ( < 0.01). The reason for this difference in behavior is that the expert group took more fixations and saccades to deeply visually process the position and size of the gap area. At the same time, to gain opportunities to score goals, they prioritized the extraction and processing of information from the far offensive player area, which is closer to the goal. They used a following fixation mode to search for both offensive and defensive players, repeatedly observing the positional characteristics and changes in the gaps created by both sides. They used fewer fixations for visual search of the goal area and defensive player area, forming a visual allocation principle of far offensive players > near offensive players > gap > marking players > pressing players > covering players > goal.
The expert group can effectively balance decision-making agility and tactical rationality, effectively identify key information, deeply process the extracted information, and adopt different search strategies to handle key and non-key information, forming an economical and effective visual allocation principle to complete efficient perceptual prediction.
定量评估足球运动员在3V3进攻战术情境中的视觉搜索情况,探索高水平运动员在多目标跟踪下的眼动特征及信息处理机制。
采用专家-新手研究范式,选取8名二级足球运动员作为专家组,8名足球专业大学生作为新手组。以真实比赛的3V3进攻战术场景作为刺激材料。使用配备D-lab软件的Dikablis Professional头戴式眼动仪记录并处理参与者的眼动数据和决策敏捷性数据。邀请专家对进攻战术决策数据的合理性进行独立评分。在SPSS 25.0软件上进行独立样本t检验以进行组间比较分析。
专家组的战术决策敏捷性和合理性显著高于新手组(P<0.01)。这种行为差异的原因在于,专家组进行了更多的注视和扫视,以深入视觉处理间隙区域的位置和大小。同时,为了获得进球机会,他们优先从距离球门较近的远侧进攻球员区域提取和处理信息。他们采用跟随注视模式搜索进攻和防守球员,反复观察双方创造的间隙的位置特征和变化。他们对球门区域和防守球员区域的视觉搜索注视次数较少,形成了远侧进攻球员>近侧进攻球员>间隙>盯人球员>压迫球员>掩护球员>球门的视觉分配原则。
专家组能够有效平衡决策敏捷性和战术合理性,有效识别关键信息,深入处理提取的信息,并采用不同的搜索策略处理关键和非关键信息,形成经济有效的视觉分配原则以完成高效的感知预测。