Silva Ana Filipa, Afonso José, Sampaio António, Pimenta Nuno, Lima Ricardo Franco, Castro Henrique de Oliveira, Ramirez-Campillo Rodrigo, Teoldo Israel, Sarmento Hugo, González Fernández Francisco, Kaczmarek Agnieszka, Oniszczuk Anna, Murawska-Ciałowicz Eugenia
Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
The Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 22;13:1001066. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001066. eCollection 2022.
For a long time, in sports, researchers have tried to understand an expert by comparing them with novices, raising the doubts if the visual search characteristics distinguish experts from novices. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to review and conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the differences in visual search behavior between experts and novices in team sports athletes.
This systematic review with meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane's guidelines. Healthy team athletes were included, which engaged in regular practice, from any sex or competitive level, specifically classified as expert or novice in the original research (i.e., if they were classified after the experiment, based on one of the tests, the study would be excluded). We considered only research published in peer-reviewed journals, with no limitations regarding date or language. It was considered healthy team sport athletes engaged in regular practice. The scenarios could be or film-based. The databases of EBSCO (Academic Search Complete, Academic Search Ultimate, APA PsycArticles, and APA PsycINFO), PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were used to perform the searches. The risk of bias was calculated through the RoBANS tool.
From a total of 6,257 records, of which 985 were duplicates, titles and abstracts of 5,272 were screened, and 45 required full-text analysis. Of those, 23 were excluded due to not fulfilling the eligibility criteria regarding participants. In the end, 22 studies were selected, however, as two studies were part of the same trial and were analyzed conjointly.
Experts showed to be older and with more years of practice. The ability to distinguish experts from novices was not so clear regarding the variables analyzed. This could be due to the strategies chosen in each study, which were specific to each scenario, and when grouping all together, it was lost information within non-representative averages. The distinction between experts and novices was not clear, showing a lot of heterogeneity in the included studies. The expert classification itself may have been the conditioning aspect for these results, retaining the doubt and the need for more studies in the field.
The protocol was pre-registered in OSF (project https://osf.io/3j4qv/, register https://osf.io/dvk2n).
长期以来,在体育领域,研究人员一直试图通过将专家与新手进行比较来了解专家,这引发了关于视觉搜索特征是否能区分专家和新手的疑问。因此,本研究的目的是进行综述和荟萃分析,以评估团队运动运动员中专家和新手在视觉搜索行为上的差异。
本系统综述和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA 2020和Cochrane指南。纳入健康的团队运动员,他们从事常规训练,不限性别或竞技水平,在原始研究中被明确分类为专家或新手(即,如果他们是在实验后根据其中一项测试进行分类,该研究将被排除)。我们仅考虑发表在同行评审期刊上的研究,对日期或语言没有限制。研究对象为从事常规训练的健康团队运动运动员。场景可以是真实的或基于视频的。使用EBSCO(学术搜索完整版、学术搜索终极版、美国心理学会心理学文摘和美国心理学会心理学数据库)、PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science数据库进行检索。通过RoBANS工具计算偏倚风险。
在总共6257条记录中,其中985条为重复记录,筛选了5272条记录的标题和摘要,并对45条记录进行了全文分析。其中,23条记录因不符合参与者资格标准而被排除。最终,选择了22项研究,然而,由于两项研究是同一试验的一部分,因此进行了联合分析。
专家显示年龄较大且训练年限更长。在所分析的变量方面,区分专家和新手的能力并不那么明确。这可能是由于每项研究中选择的策略,这些策略特定于每个场景,当将所有策略汇总在一起时,在非代表性平均值中丢失了信息。专家和新手之间的区别并不明显,在所纳入的研究中表现出很大的异质性。专家分类本身可能是这些结果的制约因素,这仍存在疑问,并且该领域需要更多的研究。
该方案已在OSF(项目https://osf.io/3j4qv/,注册https://osf.io/dvk2n)上预先注册。