Monsour Molly, Rizk Mehdi, Kazelka Maryam, Peto Ivo, Tai Alexander, Agazzi Siviero, Croci Davide M
University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States.
Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 Jul 31;86(4):457-470. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788645. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Common approaches to remove skull base tumors invading the orbital apex, cavernous sinus, middle fossa, or temporal lobe include orbitozygomatic or fronto-orbital craniotomies. Recently, different types of orbital approaches have been described as alternative minimally invasive techniques. With this systematic review, we analyzed the typology of intracranial tumors treated through transorbital approaches, especially through the lateral orbital (LO) wall, and analyzing the complication rates and outcomes. A PubMed/Medline search was performed using the criteria: "orbitotomy," "transorbital," "transpalpebral," and "lateral orbitotomy" in combination with "cavernous sinus," "middle fossa," and "temporal lobe." From these reports, we collected diagnoses, lesion sizes and locations, approaches, outcomes, aesthetic outcomes, postoperative ptosis, postoperative cranial nerve (CN) palsies, length of CN deficits postoperatively, overall complications, and follow-up length. A total of 13 papers and 3 of our own cases matched our inclusion criteria totaling 160 patients. Most patients were treated for meningiomas (135, 84.4%). The approaches included the LO approach ( = 54; 33.8%), deep transorbital ( = 5; 3.1%), mini-LO ( = 91; 56.9%), and modified LO ( = 10; 6.2%). While not all cases reported excision success, the various LO approaches achieved total ( = 42; 26.25%) resection margins. Postoperative ocular complications (including CN palsies, proptosis, or ocular disturbances) totaled 46 (28.8%) new CN palsies, 23 (14.4%) occurrences of vision loss, 1 (1.7%) with worsened proptosis, 5 (3.9%) with worsened enophthalmos, and 42 (26.3%) other complications. Microsurgical LO approaches, especially in the era of radiosurgery, may become a suitable alternative to other more established craniotomies.
切除侵犯眶尖、海绵窦、中颅窝或颞叶的颅底肿瘤的常用方法包括眶颧或额眶开颅术。最近,不同类型的眼眶入路已被描述为替代性的微创技术。通过本系统评价,我们分析了经眼眶入路治疗的颅内肿瘤的类型,特别是经外侧眶(LO)壁入路,并分析了并发症发生率和治疗结果。使用以下标准在PubMed/Medline上进行检索:“眶切开术”、“经眶”、“经睑”和“外侧眶切开术”,并与“海绵窦”、“中颅窝”和“颞叶”相结合。从这些报告中,我们收集了诊断结果、病变大小和位置、入路、治疗结果、美学效果、术后上睑下垂、术后颅神经(CN)麻痹、术后CN功能缺损持续时间、总体并发症以及随访时间。共有13篇论文和我们自己的3个病例符合纳入标准,共计160例患者。大多数患者接受了脑膜瘤治疗(135例,84.4%)。入路包括LO入路(n = 54;33.8%)、深部经眶入路(n = 5;3.1%)、微型LO入路(n = 91;56.9%)和改良LO入路(n = 10;6.2%)。虽然并非所有病例都报告了切除成功情况,但各种LO入路实现了全切(n = 42;26.25%)切缘。术后眼部并发症(包括CN麻痹、眼球突出或眼部功能障碍)共计46例(28.8%)新发CN麻痹、23例(14.4%)视力丧失、1例(1.7%)眼球突出加重、5例(3.9%)眼球内陷加重以及42例(26.3%)其他并发症。显微外科LO入路,尤其是在放射外科时代,可能成为其他更成熟开颅术的合适替代方法。