Sawar Shah, Ali Nasir, Ullah Rafi, Khakwani Fahmeed, Khan Majid
Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK.
Cardiology, Khyber Girls Medical College Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 5;17(6):e85394. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85394. eCollection 2025 Jun.
This study explores the outcomes of drug-eluting balloon (DEB)-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk, comparing it to traditional drug-eluting stent (DES)-only PCI. We conducted a retrospective study at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from June 2023 to June 2024, involving 300 patients aged 65-90 years. Half underwent DEB-only PCI, and half received DES-only PCI. Key outcomes assessed included ischemic events, major bleeding, PCI success rates, and the influence of pre-PCI bleeding risk. Data analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) revealed no significant difference in ischemic events (30% for DEB vs. 38.7% for DES), major bleeding (13.3% vs. 12.0%), or PCI success rates (86.7% vs. 92%). However, pre-PCI bleeding risk significantly influenced post-PCI bleeding. Overall, DEB-only PCI demonstrated comparable efficacy to DES-only PCI, suggesting it is a viable option for elderly patients with high bleeding risk.
本研究探讨了仅使用药物洗脱球囊(DEB)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在急性冠状动脉综合征且出血风险高的老年患者中的疗效,并将其与传统的仅使用药物洗脱支架(DES)的PCI进行比较。我们于2023年6月至2024年6月在白沙瓦的哈亚塔巴德医疗中心进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了300名年龄在65 - 90岁之间的患者。其中一半患者接受仅使用DEB的PCI,另一半接受仅使用DES的PCI。评估的主要结局包括缺血事件、大出血、PCI成功率以及PCI术前出血风险的影响。使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 25.0版(2017年发布;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行数据分析显示,缺血事件(DEB组为30%,DES组为38.7%)、大出血(13.3%对12.0%)或PCI成功率(86.7%对92%)方面均无显著差异。然而,PCI术前出血风险对PCI术后出血有显著影响。总体而言,仅使用DEB的PCI显示出与仅使用DES的PCI相当的疗效,这表明它是出血风险高的老年患者的一个可行选择。