• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下脊柱手术治疗相邻节段疾病——经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的可行替代方案:病例报告

Endoscopic spinal surgery in adjacent segment disease-a viable alternative to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a case report.

作者信息

Wong Hoi Pong Nicholas, Naidu Dinesh, Wong Soon Yaw Walter, Wu Pang Hung, Huang Yilun

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Achieve Spine and Orthopaedic Centre, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 27;11(2):387-395. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-142. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

DOI:10.21037/jss-24-142
PMID:40621379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12226185/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors present technical notes and describe a case of percutaneous unilateral endoscopic biportal transforaminal decompression in a patient with adjacent segment disease (ASD) following a previous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 69-year-old woman with a prior L4/L5 TLIF presented to the clinic with a new onset of right lower limb radiculopathy along the L3 dermatome, as well as numbness in the L2 distribution. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies revealed adjacent segment degeneration in L2/L3 and L3/L4, with disc-osteophyte complexes impinging onto the exiting L2 and L3 nerve roots, respectively. We opted for a right L2/L3 and L3/L4 unilateral endoscopic biportal transforaminal decompression. The surgery was successful, with the patient being discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 1 with minimal pain. Within 2 weeks, the patient described significant improvement in both back pain and radiculopathy, and the numbness had completely resolved. Oswestry Disability Index was used to objectively quantify outcomes and saw an improvement from 15 to 0. Notably, there were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the successful use of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal decompression to treat multi-level ASD of the lumbar spine, instead of the convention and more opted for revision TLIF. Endoscopic spinal surgery provides a promising alternative to other techniques, which can be worth its steep learning curve. This should be considered in the arsenal of spine surgeons as a minimally invasive alternative.

摘要

背景

作者介绍技术要点,并描述一例既往行经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)后出现相邻节段疾病(ASD)患者的经皮单侧内镜双孔经椎间孔减压病例。

病例描述

一名69岁女性,既往有L4/L5 TLIF手术史,因新发沿L3皮节的右下肢神经根病以及L2分布区麻木就诊。磁共振成像(MRI)检查显示L2/L3和L3/L4相邻节段退变,椎间盘骨赘复合体分别压迫L2和L3出口神经根。我们选择了右侧L2/L3和L3/L4单侧内镜双孔经椎间孔减压术。手术成功,患者术后第1天出院,疼痛轻微。2周内,患者自述背痛和神经根病均有显著改善,麻木完全消失。采用Oswestry功能障碍指数客观量化结果,该指数从15改善至0。值得注意的是,无并发症发生。

结论

本病例突出了单侧双孔内镜经椎间孔减压术成功用于治疗腰椎多节段ASD,而非传统且更常采用的翻修TLIF。内镜脊柱手术为其他技术提供了一种有前景的替代方法,尽管其学习曲线较陡。脊柱外科医生应将其作为一种微创替代方法纳入技术储备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/3691b47cf2be/jss-11-02-387-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/c978a2217726/jss-11-02-387-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/8e452d965e72/jss-11-02-387-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/6a419f6d5736/jss-11-02-387-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/cc90a718fde8/jss-11-02-387-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/b8c302ade578/jss-11-02-387-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/928d19d853e7/jss-11-02-387-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/8404eca0fe5e/jss-11-02-387-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/3691b47cf2be/jss-11-02-387-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/c978a2217726/jss-11-02-387-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/8e452d965e72/jss-11-02-387-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/6a419f6d5736/jss-11-02-387-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/cc90a718fde8/jss-11-02-387-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/b8c302ade578/jss-11-02-387-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/928d19d853e7/jss-11-02-387-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/8404eca0fe5e/jss-11-02-387-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca84/12226185/3691b47cf2be/jss-11-02-387-f8.jpg

相似文献

1
Endoscopic spinal surgery in adjacent segment disease-a viable alternative to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a case report.内镜下脊柱手术治疗相邻节段疾病——经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的可行替代方案:病例报告
J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 27;11(2):387-395. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-142. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy.内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术及椎间盘切除术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jun 25;15(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Comparison of short-term effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and MED-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for mild single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis.单侧双通道内镜与MED辅助下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗轻度单节段腰椎滑脱的短期疗效比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08892-6.
4
Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.微创与开放单节段经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的长期临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2049-2065. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
5
L4-S1 ALIF restores and maintains lordosis while minimizing adjacent segment disease compared to L4-S1 TLIF.与L4-S1经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术相比,L4-S1前路腰椎椎体间融合术可恢复并维持脊柱前凸,同时将相邻节段疾病的发生降至最低。
Spine J. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.06.001.
6
Evaluation of the Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Conventional Fusion Operations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.双板内镜腰椎体间融合术与传统融合手术疗效比较的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.071. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
Comparison of Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Meta-analysis.内镜下与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 1;37(2):56-66. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001428. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
8
"Early Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimal Invasive in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases".单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间融合术与微创治疗腰椎退变性疾病的早期疗效和安全性对比
Clin Spine Surg. 2023 Oct 1;36(8):E390-E396. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001470. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
9
Surgical Invasiveness, Hidden Blood Loss, and Outcomes of Two Endoscopic Lumbar Fusion Techniques for Degenerative Disease: A Comparative Study.两种内镜下腰椎融合技术治疗退行性疾病的手术侵袭性、隐匿性失血及疗效:一项比较研究
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jun 25:124208. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124208.
10
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)与后路腰椎体间融合术(PLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1712-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Learning Curve, Complexity, Psychological Stress, and Work Relative Value Units for CPT 62380 Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Decompression vs Traditional Lumbar Spine Surgeries: A Paired Rasch Survey Study.CPT 62380 内镜下腰椎减压术与传统腰椎手术的学习曲线、复杂性、心理压力及工作相对价值单位的比较分析:一项配对Rasch调查研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):138-151. doi: 10.14444/8594.
2
Factors affecting return to work following endoscopic lumbar foraminal stenosis surgery: A single-center series.影响内镜下腰椎椎间孔狭窄症手术后重返工作岗位的因素:一项单中心研究系列
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Nov 24;14:408. doi: 10.25259/SNI_659_2023. eCollection 2023.
3
Hospital cost differences between open and endoscopic lumbar spine decompression surgery.
开放式与内镜下腰椎减压手术的医院成本差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Oct 13;40(1):77-83. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.SPINE23439. Print 2024 Jan 1.
4
Comprehensive comparison of three techniques for the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术后相邻节段退变三种治疗技术的综合比较
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 30;10:1096483. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1096483. eCollection 2023.
5
Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.脊柱内镜手术的并发症与处理
Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):56-77. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346226.113. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
6
Reoperation Rates Due to Adjacent Segment Disease Following Primary 1 to 2-Level Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.初次单节段或双节段微创 versus 开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后因邻近节段疾病导致的再次手术率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Sep 15;48(18):1295-1299. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004645. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
Is Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Superior to Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Postoperative Radiologic Outcomes of Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease? A Systematic Review.微创脊柱手术与内镜脊柱手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病术后放射学结果比较的系统评价。
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;85(2):182-191. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-2694. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
8
Safety and clinical efficacy of endoscopic procedures for the treatment of adjacent segmental disease after lumbar fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜手术治疗腰椎融合术后邻近节段疾病的安全性和临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 6;18(2):e0280135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280135. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluation of Endoscopic Versus Open Lumbar Discectomy: A Multi-Center Retrospective Review Utilizing the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database.内镜下与开放性腰椎间盘切除术的评估:利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库进行的多中心回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 May 22;14(5):e25202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25202. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Hyperacute onset of adjacent segment disease with dorsally migrated herniated nucleus pulposus causing cauda equina syndrome: a case report.伴背侧移位的椎间盘髓核突出致马尾综合征的临近节段病的超急发作:一例报告。
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Aug;38(4):1006-1009. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1973368. Epub 2021 Sep 3.