Zhu Bonnie, Lin Peter, Bevan Heidi, Croker Anne, Fisher Karin
St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia.
Orange Health Service, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Rural Remote Health. 2025 Jul;25(3):9343. doi: 10.22605/RRH9343. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
Carer roles in palliative care are complex and have many location-based issues, including for people in rural areas. Meaningful support for carers in rural areas needs to be informed by carers' actual experiences rather than relying on routine data collection. To embrace the complexity of carer experiences, we framed caregiving in palliative care as a journey that involves actions and needs to be navigated. We deliberately chose to use the verb 'navigate' as an action-based metaphor. Thus, we positioned ourselves to view carers' involvement in palliative care in rural areas as being non-linear, active and involving undetermined paths. Locating our research in the interpretive paradigm, we sought to develop a conceptual framework to inform reflections and discussions to provide meaningful support for carers involved in palliative care in rural areas.
Our qualitative research, undertaken in the interpretive paradigm, was informed by philosophical hermeneutics. Participants were carers who had previously cared for patients requiring palliative care. Local clinicians approached potential participants known to them, inviting them to participate if interested. Our sample size of eight reflects the outcome of a deliberate balance between the sensitivity of the topic, scope for deep engagement through semi-structured interviews, recruitment requiring established carer-clinician relationships, our location with low population density and workforce shortages, and considerations for research informed by philosophical hermeneutics. Interpretations were iterative, involving cyclical phases of analysis, moving between individual and collective engagement with data, participant quotes and whole transcripts (hermeneutic circle). Through ongoing returns to the data, we moved to conceptually higher understandings (question-and-answer dialogue) that were portrayed through three dimensions (fusion of horizons).
The experiences of carers as they navigated palliative care were interpreted as three interrelated dimensions: 'realm of shifting sands', 'staying afloat' and 'doing for and with'. 'Realm of shifting sands' highlights the diversity and potential fragility of terrains carers are navigating: that is foundational sense of duty, constellations of relationships and inevitability of decline. 'Staying afloat' highlights the dynamic responses required to navigate these terrains, that is revisiting foundational sense of duty, engaging with constellations of relationships and responding to the inevitability of decline. Doing for and with highlights the multiple actions as carers hold their course and participate in palliative care, that is advocating, preparing and collaborating.
Complexities faced by caregivers can be framed in relation to individual reference points, personal capabilities, particular circumstances and locational factors, with complexities not all relating to the rural setting. For carers, rural settings encompassed more than location-based properties, involving aspects of the community, values and personal connections relevant to caregivers' changing situations. Thus, a rural location is one of a range of complexities that can both hinder and enhance carers' sensemaking and participation in palliative care. While undertaken in our rural region, we were not seeking for this research to be representative of diverse rural settings. Rather, we provide the information to facilitate transferability of our findings so readers can use their understanding of their own contexts to establish the relevance of our findings to their situations.
姑息治疗中的照护者角色复杂,存在诸多基于地域的问题,农村地区的人们也不例外。要为农村地区的照护者提供切实有效的支持,需依据他们的实际经历,而非仅仅依赖常规数据收集。为全面理解照护者的复杂经历,我们将姑息治疗中的照护视为一段包含诸多行动且需摸索前行的旅程。我们特意选用动词“navigate”(摸索前行)作为基于行动的隐喻。如此一来,我们将农村地区照护者参与姑息治疗的过程视为非线性、积极主动且充满未知路径的过程。基于解释性范式开展研究,我们力图构建一个概念框架,以启发反思与讨论,从而为农村地区参与姑息治疗的照护者提供切实有效的支持。
我们基于解释性范式开展的定性研究以哲学诠释学为指导。研究对象为曾照护过需要姑息治疗患者的照护者。当地临床医生联系他们认识的潜在参与者,若对方感兴趣便邀请其参与。我们选取的八名样本反映了在以下因素之间审慎权衡的结果:主题的敏感性、通过半结构化访谈深入交流的空间、招募工作需依赖已有的照护者与临床医生关系、我们所在地区人口密度低且劳动力短缺,以及哲学诠释学对研究的考量。解读过程是迭代的,包括分析的循环阶段,在对数据、参与者引述和完整访谈记录的个体与集体参与之间转换(诠释循环)。通过不断回归数据,我们达成了概念层面更高层次的理解(问答对话),并通过三个维度(视域融合)进行呈现。
照护者在姑息治疗中摸索前行的经历被解读为三个相互关联的维度:“流沙领域”“保持漂浮”和“为……并与……一起行动”。“流沙领域”凸显了照护者所面临的各种情况的多样性和潜在脆弱性:即基本的责任感、各种关系以及衰退的必然性。“保持漂浮”强调了应对这些情况所需的动态反应,即重新审视基本的责任感、处理各种关系以及应对衰退的必然性。“为……并与……一起行动”突出了照护者在坚持并参与姑息治疗过程中的多种行动,即倡导、准备和协作。
照护者所面临的复杂性可依据个人参照点、个人能力、具体情况和地域因素来界定,其中并非所有复杂性都与农村环境相关。对于照护者而言,农村环境所涵盖的不仅仅是基于地理位置的特征,还涉及社区、价值观以及与照护者不断变化的情况相关的个人联系等方面。因此,农村地理位置只是众多可能阻碍或促进照护者理解及参与姑息治疗的复杂性因素之一。尽管我们的研究是在农村地区进行的,但我们并非旨在使该研究具有广泛农村环境的代表性。相反,我们提供这些信息以促进研究结果的可转移性,以便读者能根据对自身背景的理解来确定我们的研究结果与他们情况的相关性。