• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于电动汽车调度和电池更换站充电调度问题的双决策模型。

A bi-decision model for electric vehicle dispatch and battery swapping station charging schedule problem.

作者信息

Su Yong, Tian Shishun, Wu Hao, Li Xia

机构信息

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08301-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-08301-x
PMID:40628845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12238488/
Abstract

The blooming population and advanced technology of electric vehicles (EVs) have promoted the wide studies on battery swapping station (BSS) models. However, current BSS researches only focus on isolated decision models, such as the dispatching model or charging schedule model, which cannot represent the realistic situation and obtain the optimal solution for both the EV drivers and BSS operators. In this paper, a bi-decision model for EV dispatch and BSS charging schedule problem is proposed to minimize the average extra time (ET) through the assigned BSS for EVs, and optimize the electricity cost, charging damage to batteries, and power load variance for BSSs, where the solution in the first decision is the pre-defined condition of the second decision model. Knowing that two models are both Non-deterministic Polynomial-time hard (NP-hard) problems, two types of evolutionary algorithms are proposed. In the first model, an adaptive tabu search (ATS) algorithm is proposed by formatting the EVs' ET, the number of batteries, and queuing EVs at BSSs. In the second model, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is proposed to obtain the Pareto set of the complicated scheduling problem. Experiments are carried out to investigate the viability of the bi-decision model by comparing it with rule-based strategies, such as nearest-in-range. Also, the waiting times in the first decision and the scheduling results are illustrated in the Gantt charts. Lastly, a comprehensive comparison between the proposed ATS algorithm and the MOPSO algorithm is presented to show the effectiveness and competitiveness.

摘要

电动汽车(EV)数量的不断增加和技术的进步推动了对电池更换站(BSS)模型的广泛研究。然而,目前的BSS研究仅关注孤立的决策模型,如调度模型或充电计划模型,这些模型无法代表实际情况,也无法为电动汽车驾驶员和BSS运营商获得最优解。本文提出了一种电动汽车调度和BSS充电计划问题的双决策模型,以通过为电动汽车分配BSS来最小化平均额外时间(ET),并优化BSS的电力成本、电池充电损耗和功率负荷方差,其中第一个决策的解是第二个决策模型的预定义条件。由于知道这两个模型都是非确定性多项式时间难(NP-hard)问题,因此提出了两种进化算法。在第一个模型中,通过对电动汽车的ET、电池数量和在BSS处排队的电动汽车进行格式化,提出了一种自适应禁忌搜索(ATS)算法。在第二个模型中,提出了一种多目标粒子群优化(MOPSO)算法来获得复杂调度问题的帕累托集。通过将双决策模型与基于规则的策略(如最近距离策略)进行比较,进行实验以研究该模型的可行性。此外,第一个决策中的等待时间和调度结果在甘特图中进行了说明。最后,对所提出的ATS算法和MOPSO算法进行了全面比较,以展示其有效性和竞争力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/12238488/b08b4643c3ff/41598_2025_8301_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/12238488/268e845236e2/41598_2025_8301_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/12238488/b08b4643c3ff/41598_2025_8301_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/12238488/268e845236e2/41598_2025_8301_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/12238488/b08b4643c3ff/41598_2025_8301_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A bi-decision model for electric vehicle dispatch and battery swapping station charging schedule problem.一种用于电动汽车调度和电池更换站充电调度问题的双决策模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08301-x.
2
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
3
Fast charging coordination for electric vehicles in a charging station based on heuristics and metaheuristics.基于启发式算法和元启发式算法的充电站中电动汽车快速充电协调
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06788-y.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Stochastic economic placement and sizing of electric vehicles charging station with renewable units and battery bank in smart distribution network.智能配电网中含可再生能源机组和电池组的电动汽车充电站的随机经济布局与容量确定
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10391-6.
8
Electric vehicles charging station allocation based on load profile forecasting and Dijkstra's algorithm for optimal path planning.基于负荷曲线预测和迪杰斯特拉算法进行最优路径规划的电动汽车充电站分配
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 4;15(1):23844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08840-3.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-objective optimization framework for electric vehicle charging and discharging scheduling in distribution networks using the red deer algorithm.基于红鹿算法的配电网电动汽车充放电调度多目标优化框架
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 17;15(1):13343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97473-7.
2
A multi-objective optimization framework for EV-integrated distribution grids using the hiking optimization algorithm.一种使用徒步优化算法的电动汽车集成配电网多目标优化框架。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 17;15(1):13324. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97271-1.
3
Simultaneous distributed generation and electric vehicles hosting capacity enhancement through a synergetic hierarchical bi-level optimization approach based on demand response and Volt/VAR control.
基于需求响应和电压/无功控制的协同分层双层优化方法同时提高分布式发电和电动汽车接纳能力
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(1):5443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88635-8.
4
Hybrid multi-objective optimization of µ-synthesis robust controller for frequency regulation in isolated microgrids.用于孤立微电网频率调节的μ综合鲁棒控制器的混合多目标优化
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 17;15(1):2298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85910-6.
5
Double layers optimal scheduling of distribution networks and photovoltaic charging and storage station cluster based on leader follower game theory.基于领导者-跟随者博弈理论的配电网与光伏充储电站集群双层优化调度
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80397-z.
6
Improved PICEA-g-based multi-objective optimization scheduling method for distribution network with large-scale electric vehicles.基于改进PICEA-g的大规模电动汽车接入配电网多目标优化调度方法
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 23;14(1):29070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80184-w.
7
Enhancing distribution system performance by optimizing electric vehicle charging station integration in smart grids using the honey badger algorithm.通过使用蜜獾算法优化智能电网中的电动汽车充电站集成来提高配电系统性能。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 9;14(1):27341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78569-y.