• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项普通人群队列研究中与远程问卷填写相关的留存情况及特征:项目基线健康研究

Retention and characteristics associated with remote questionnaire completion in a general population cohort study: the project baseline health study.

作者信息

Carroll Megan K, Faheem Safa, Bouteiller Jean, Hernandez Adrian, Mahaffey Kenneth W, Mega Jessica L, Pagidipati Neha, Schaack Terry, Shah Svati H, Shashidhar Sumana, Swope Susan, Williams Donna, Plowman R Scooter, Simard Edgar P, Short Sarah A, Sullivan Shannon S

机构信息

Verily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States.

Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 24;7:1520132. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1520132. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1520132
PMID:40630050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12235916/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate remote participant engagement in a clinical study over time, based on data from the Project Baseline Health Study (PBHS), a hybrid in-person and virtual study.

METHODS

The PBHS enrolled 2,502 adult US residents from March 3, 2017 to April 26, 2019, with a ≤5-year follow-up. We summarized 4-year retention and rates of longitudinal patient-reported outcome survey completion. We investigated participant characteristics for their associations with quarterly remote survey completion using regression models.

RESULTS

Of the total participants ( = 2,502), 94% remained enrolled after 4 years and 60% completed all annual visits; 2,490 participants stayed enrolled for at least one quarter. The median (IQR) number of remote electronic survey sets completed was 8 (3-12), of a possible 16. Age [odds ratio (OR), >70 vs. ≤30 years: 2.56; 95% CI: 2.24-2.94] and education (OR, advanced degree vs. ≤high school: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.22-1.52) were positively associated with remote survey completion. Participants with lower odds of completion were Black (OR vs. White: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.67-0.80), Hispanic (OR vs. non-Hispanic: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.93), or had at least mild symptoms of depression (OR vs. without: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84-0.96) or anxiety (OR vs. without: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.78-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 94% of PBHS participants remained enrolled after four years. Age, race, ethnicity, income, education, and symptomatic depression/anxiety were significantly associated with longitudinal remote questionnaire completion. These findings on engagement over time may inform future longitudinal study design.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT03154346).

摘要

目的

基于“基线健康项目研究”(PBHS)的数据,评估远程参与者在一项临床研究中随时间推移的参与情况,该研究是一项线下和虚拟相结合的研究。

方法

PBHS在2017年3月3日至2019年4月26日期间招募了2502名美国成年居民,并进行了为期≤5年的随访。我们总结了4年的留存率以及纵向患者报告结局调查的完成率。我们使用回归模型研究参与者特征与季度远程调查完成情况之间的关联。

结果

在全部参与者(n = 2502)中,94%在4年后仍保持参与状态,60%完成了所有年度访视;2490名参与者至少参与了一个季度。在可能的16次远程电子调查中,完成的中位数(四分位间距)为8次(3 - 12次)。年龄[优势比(OR),>70岁与≤30岁相比:2.56;95%置信区间:2.24 - 2.94]和教育程度(OR,高等学位与≤高中相比:1.36;95%置信区间:1.22 - 1.52)与远程调查完成情况呈正相关。完成可能性较低的参与者为黑人(与白人相比OR:0.73;95%置信区间:0.67 - 0.80)、西班牙裔(与非西班牙裔相比OR:0.84;95%置信区间:0.77 - 0.93),或至少有轻度抑郁症状(与无抑郁症状相比OR:0.90;95%置信区间:0.84 - 0.96)或焦虑症状(与无焦虑症状相比OR:0.84;95%置信区间:0.78 - 0.90)。

结论

总体而言,94%的PBHS参与者在4年后仍保持参与状态。年龄、种族、民族、收入、教育程度以及有症状的抑郁/焦虑与纵向远程问卷完成情况显著相关。这些关于随时间推移参与情况的发现可能为未来纵向研究设计提供参考。

临床试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov,标识符(NCT03154346)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3f/12235916/2fe3c88a2690/fdgth-07-1520132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3f/12235916/a28df4344bc0/fdgth-07-1520132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3f/12235916/4b4c0f34d431/fdgth-07-1520132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3f/12235916/2fe3c88a2690/fdgth-07-1520132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3f/12235916/a28df4344bc0/fdgth-07-1520132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3f/12235916/4b4c0f34d431/fdgth-07-1520132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3f/12235916/2fe3c88a2690/fdgth-07-1520132-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Retention and characteristics associated with remote questionnaire completion in a general population cohort study: the project baseline health study.在一项普通人群队列研究中与远程问卷填写相关的留存情况及特征:项目基线健康研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 24;7:1520132. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1520132. eCollection 2025.
2
Multifaceted behavioral interventions to improve topical glaucoma therapy adherence in adults.多方面行为干预以提高成人局部青光眼治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD015788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015788.pub2.
3
Monitoring strategies for clinical intervention studies.临床干预研究的监测策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 8;12(12):MR000051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000051.pub2.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
5
Learning together for mental health: feasibility of measures to assess a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention in secondary schools.共同学习促进心理健康:评估中学全校心理健康与幸福干预措施的可行性
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 25:1-18. doi: 10.3310/GFDT2323.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.
9
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
10
Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of male bladder outlet obstruction: long-term follow-up of the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.用于男性膀胱出口梗阻诊断和管理的尿动力学检查:UPSTREAM非劣效性随机对照试验的长期随访
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(26):1-57. doi: 10.3310/SLPT4675.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Engagement of Diverse Study Cohorts in Decentralized Research: Longitudinal Analysis of "All of Us" Research Program Data.不同研究队列长期参与去中心化研究:“我们所有人”研究计划数据的纵向分析
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Mar 19;14:e56803. doi: 10.2196/56803.
2
Building a Digital Health Research Platform to Enable Recruitment, Enrollment, Data Collection, and Follow-Up for a Highly Diverse Longitudinal US Cohort of 1 Million People in the All of Us Research Program: Design and Implementation Study.构建一个数字健康研究平台,以实现美国“我们所有人”研究计划中100万高度多样化纵向队列的招募、入组、数据收集和随访:设计与实施研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e60189. doi: 10.2196/60189.
3
Data-driven science and diversity in the All of Us Research Program.
“我们所有人”研究项目中的数据驱动型科学与多样性
Sci Transl Med. 2023 Dec 13;15(726):eade9214. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.ade9214.
4
Survey response over 15 years of follow-up in the Millennium Cohort Study.在千禧队列研究中进行了超过 15 年的随访后的调查反馈。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Sep 9;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02018-z.
5
Predictors of adherence to electronic self-monitoring in patients with bipolar disorder: a contactless study using Growth Mixture Models.双相情感障碍患者电子自我监测依从性的预测因素:一项使用生长混合模型的非接触式研究。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2023 May 17;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40345-023-00297-5.
6
The association of baseline depressive symptoms and stress on withdrawal in a national longitudinal cohort: the REGARDS study.基线抑郁症状和压力与全国纵向队列研究中戒断的关联:REGARDS 研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;84:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
Digitally enabled decentralised research: opportunities to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and observational studies.数字化赋能的去中心化研究:提高临床试验和观察性研究效率的机遇
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):328-331. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112253. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
8
Design and Implementation of the All of Us Research Program COVID-19 Participant Experience (COPE) Survey.All of Us 研究计划 COVID-19 参与者体验(COPE)调查的设计与实施。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 2;192(6):972-986. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad035.
9
Compliance Challenges in a Longitudinal COVID-19 Cohort Using Wearables for Continuous Monitoring: Observational Study.使用可穿戴设备进行连续监测的 COVID-19 纵向队列研究中的依从性挑战:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 5;25:e43134. doi: 10.2196/43134.
10
The Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity.研究计划:数据质量、效用和多样性。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Aug 12;3(8):100570. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100570.