Schroeder Sarah E, Oakes Robert, Shelstad Ryan, Thompson Richard
Bryan Heart, Division of Mechanical Circulatory Support, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Bryan Heart, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Med Devices (Auckl). 2025 Jul 3;18:377-386. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S509115. eCollection 2025.
Redo cardiac surgery outcomes, including increased transfusions and risk of reoperation, worsen with post-operative bleeding. This study aimed to directly compare the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder to no hemostatic agent use during planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery.
Fifty-one participants in two cohorts underwent planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery. The retrospective cohort (n = 26) was chosen from redo cardiac surgeries completed between 2019 and 2020, while the prospective cohort (n = 25) included sequential redo cardiac surgeries with the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder. Patient operative characteristics, along with first 24-hour transfusion use (packed red blood cells (pRBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (Plts), chest tube outputs (CTO) at 12, 24 and 48 hours, and reoperation rates were compared.
There was a higher non-statistical average of intraoperative pRBC and FFP rates in the retrospective cohort, compared to cases where absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (2 ± 2.9 vs 1.1 ± 1.4 units pRBC, p = 0.414; and 1.4 ± 1.8 vs 0.6 ± 1 units FFP, p = 0.070) while there were statistical differences in Plts use in the retrospective cohort compared to when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (1 ± 1.3 vs 0.4 ± 0.7 units plts, p = 0.028). Statistically significant lower amounts of CTO in the first 12 hours and the 12-24-hour intervals were found when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (817 ± 520 vs 558 ± 352 milliliters, p = 0.028; and 1144 ± 704 vs 830 ± 474 milliliters, p = 0.044, respectively). There were three reoperations in the retrospective cohort due to suspected bleeding, compared to no reoperations in the absorbable polysaccharide powder cohort.
This study highlights fewer transfusions, lower CTO, and decreased need for reoperation when using absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Further randomized trials are needed to more accurately define benefits of absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Word count: 302.
再次心脏手术的结果,包括输血增加和再次手术风险,会因术后出血而恶化。本研究旨在直接比较在计划性非急诊再次心脏手术中使用可吸收多糖粉末与不使用止血剂的情况。
两个队列中的51名参与者接受了计划性非急诊再次心脏手术。回顾性队列(n = 26)选自2019年至2020年完成的再次心脏手术,而前瞻性队列(n = 25)包括连续使用可吸收多糖粉末的再次心脏手术。比较了患者的手术特征,以及最初24小时的输血情况(浓缩红细胞(pRBC)、新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)和血小板(Plts))、12、24和48小时的胸管引流量(CTO)以及再次手术率。
与使用可吸收多糖粉末的病例相比,回顾性队列中术中pRBC和FFP率的非统计学平均水平更高(2 ± 2.9对1.1 ± 1.4单位pRBC,p = 0.414;1.4 ± 1.8对0.6 ± 1单位FFP,p = 0.070),而回顾性队列中Plts的使用与使用可吸收多糖粉末时相比存在统计学差异(1 ± 1.3对0.4 ± 0.7单位Plts,p = 0.028)。使用可吸收多糖粉末时,在最初12小时和12 - 24小时间隔内CTO的量在统计学上显著更低(817 ± 520对558 ± 352毫升,p = 0.028;1144 ± 704对830 ± 474毫升,p = 0.044)。回顾性队列中有3例因疑似出血进行了再次手术,而可吸收多糖粉末队列中没有再次手术。
本研究强调在再次心脏手术中使用可吸收多糖粉末时输血减少、CTO降低且再次手术需求减少。需要进一步的随机试验来更准确地确定可吸收多糖粉末在再次心脏手术中的益处。字数:302。