Liu Bo, You Jizhi, Fan Yunxiang, Xia Yunping, Zhang Xiang, Zhang Yang
College of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
College of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China.
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jun 24;13:1546156. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1546156. eCollection 2025.
Early exercise interventions targeting lower limb muscles are critical for enhancing motor development in children with cerebral palsy (CP). While both resistance training, which enhances muscular strength and endurance, and power training, which targets explosive force production and movement velocity, fall under the umbrella of strength training, this focused review synthesizes current evidence on muscle hypertrophy resulting from these two modalities in children with CP.
The Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Embase were searched through March 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials assessing muscle fascicle length or proxy indicators of muscle fiber diameter following resistance or power training in children with CP. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate Cohen's comparing strength training with regular physiotherapy.
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were systematically reviewed, with five included in the meta-analysis. These five studies reported outcomes from 80 participants in the strength training group and 73 participants in the traditional physiotherapy group. All participants were ambulatory children classified with low to mild levels on the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Resistance training significantly increased muscle fiber diameter ( = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.54-1.09), whereas power training did not ( = 0.35, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.99). Neither training modality produced a significant increase in muscle fascicle length (resistance training: = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.17 to 0.56; power training: = 0.37, 95% CI = -0.27 to 1.01). Notably, one study comparing power and resistance training demonstrated a highly significant improvement in muscle fascicle length ( = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.13-2.27), which may be attributed to the high-velocity, high-load nature of concentric power training.
Current evidence favors resistance training to increase muscle fiber diameter in ambulatory children with CP. As individuals progress, maximal loads and repetitions should be progressively increased and complemented with explosive power training to further enhance muscle fascicle length and lower limb function. The optimal protocol for children with high levels of functional disability remains to be established.
针对下肢肌肉的早期运动干预对于促进脑瘫(CP)患儿的运动发育至关重要。虽然增强肌肉力量和耐力的阻力训练以及针对爆发力产生和运动速度的功率训练都属于力量训练范畴,但本综述综合了目前关于这两种训练方式对CP患儿肌肉肥大影响的证据。
检索截至2025年3月的Web of Science核心合集、Scopus和Embase。符合条件的研究为随机对照试验,评估CP患儿进行阻力训练或功率训练后肌肉束长度或肌肉纤维直径的替代指标。进行随机效应荟萃分析以计算Cohen's ,比较力量训练与常规物理治疗。
八项研究符合纳入标准并进行了系统综述,五项纳入荟萃分析。这五项研究报告了力量训练组80名参与者和传统物理治疗组73名参与者的结果。所有参与者均为在粗大运动功能分类系统中被分类为低至轻度水平的能行走儿童。阻力训练显著增加了肌肉纤维直径( = 0.82,95%CI = 0.54 - 1.09),而功率训练则未增加( = 0.35,95%CI = -0.29至0.99)。两种训练方式均未使肌肉束长度显著增加(阻力训练: = 0.19,95%CI = -0.17至0.56;功率训练: = 0.37,95%CI = -0.27至1.01)。值得注意的是,一项比较功率训练和阻力训练的研究表明肌肉束长度有高度显著的改善( = 1.20,95%CI = 0.13 - 2.27),这可能归因于向心功率训练的高速、高负荷性质。
目前的证据支持阻力训练可增加能行走的CP患儿的肌肉纤维直径。随着个体的进展,最大负荷和重复次数应逐渐增加,并辅以爆发力训练以进一步增加肌肉束长度和下肢功能。对于功能残疾程度较高的儿童,最佳方案仍有待确定。