• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use for Heart Failure in US Ambulatory Cardiovascular Care.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在美国门诊心血管护理中用于治疗心力衰竭。
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2145.
2
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂用于心血管疾病患者:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD013650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013650.pub2.
3
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and inverse risk of new-onset atopic dermatitis in a cohort with diabetes: a nationwide active-comparator study.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与糖尿病队列中新发特应性皮炎的反向风险:一项全国性活性对照研究
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):74-84. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf086.
4
Effects of the Nonsteroidal MRA Finerenone With and Without Concomitant SGLT2 Inhibitor Use in Heart Failure.非甾体类盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂非奈利酮联合或不联合SGLT2抑制剂用于心力衰竭的疗效
Circulation. 2025 Jan 14;151(2):149-158. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072055. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
5
Increased risk of adverse events among patients with vs. without systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease prescribed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study.与未使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂的患者相比,使用该药物的系统性自身免疫性风湿病患者发生不良事件的风险增加:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;43(12):3839-3847. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07206-w. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
6
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Erythrocytosis, and Thrombosis in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病成人患者中的钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂、红细胞增多症和血栓形成
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517086. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17086.
7
Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.轻度射血分数降低或保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡方式:FINEARTS-HF随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Mar 30. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0860.
8
Pharmacological Treatments in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.射血分数轻度降低和保留的心力衰竭的药物治疗:系统评价和网状荟萃分析
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;12(4):616-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
Patterns of beta-blocker use and dose optimization among ambulatory heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) attending public hospitals in Northeast Ethiopia: a multi-center cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚东北部公立医院门诊射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中β受体阻滞剂的使用模式及剂量优化:一项多中心横断面研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04501-5.
10
SGLT2 Inhibitors and Risk for Hyperkalemia Among Individuals Receiving RAAS Inhibitors.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与接受肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗的个体发生高钾血症的风险
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0686.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Adoption of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭住院患者早期应用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):89-94. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4489.
2
County-Level Variation in Triple Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者三联指南指导药物治疗的县级差异
JACC Adv. 2024 Jun 12;3(7):101014. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101014. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Safety of SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists in US veterans with and without chronic kidney disease: a population-based study.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂、二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在美国患有和未患有慢性肾病退伍军人中的安全性:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jun 18;36:100814. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100814. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
SGLT2 Inhibitors, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.SGLT2 抑制剂在心力衰竭患者中的功能能力和生活质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245135. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5135.
5
National Trends in Hospital Performance in Guideline-Recommended Pharmacologic Treatment for Heart Failure at Discharge.出院时心力衰竭指南推荐药物治疗的医院绩效的国家趋势
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Jun;12(6):1059-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.02.014. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
Uptake of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在心力衰竭住院患者中的应用:来自退伍军人事务医疗保健系统的见解。
J Card Fail. 2024 Sep;30(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.12.018. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
7
2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.《2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南》2023年聚焦更新
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3627-3639. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195.
8
Clinical Inertia Among Outpatients With Heart Failure: Application of Treatment Nonintensification Taxonomy to EPIC-HF Trial.心力衰竭门诊患者的临床惰性:治疗非强化分类在 EPIC-HF 试验中的应用。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Nov;11(11):1579-1591. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.022. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
9
Opportunities and Achievement of Medication Initiation Among Inpatients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低的心力衰竭住院患者药物治疗启动的机会和成就。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;11(8 Pt 1):918-929. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
10
Contemporary Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Therapy Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in the US: The Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.美国射血分数降低的心力衰竭住院患者中钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗的当代应用:遵循指南-心力衰竭注册研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):652-661. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1266.

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在美国门诊心血管护理中用于治疗心力衰竭。

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use for Heart Failure in US Ambulatory Cardiovascular Care.

作者信息

El Rafei Abdelghani, Gosch Kensey, Manning Evan S, Ghajar Alireza, Raghavan Sridharan, Maddox Thomas M, Peterson Pamela N, Fleming Lisa, Arnold Suzanne V, Chan Paul S, Greene Stephen J, Fonarow Gregg C, Jones Philip G, Allen Larry A, Hess Paul L

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, St Luke's Mid America, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2145.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2145
PMID:40632519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12242822/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy reduces risk of heart failure (HF) events and cardiovascular death among individuals with HF. Trends of SGLT2i use in cardiovascular ambulatory care in the US remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the rate of SGLT2i use among patients with HF in the cardiovascular ambulatory care setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023. Included for analysis were patients with HF enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) registry, a national ambulatory cardiovascular care quality improvement registry. Study data were analyzed from February 15, 2024, through January 15, 2025.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient-level and practice-level prescription of SGLT2i therapy.

RESULTS

Of 759 915 patients (mean [SD] age, 70 [14] years; 359 270 women [47.3%]; 49 252 Black individuals [14.6%]; 278 303 White individuals [82.7%]) with HF at 191 US sites, 76 927 (10.1%) were prescribed SGLT2i. Among patients with available ejection fraction (EF) data, 20 544 (17.9%) with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) and 36 615 (8.9%) with HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) or HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) were prescribed SGLT2i. Rates of SGLT2i use for all patients with HF increased from 4.6% in the third quarter of 2019 to 16.2% in the second quarter of 2023, from 5.1% to 28.5% for those with HFrEF, and from 4.5% to 12.8% for those with HFmrEF or HFpEF (P for trend <.001). SGLT2i was less commonly used for older persons (IQR age, 80 years vs 63 years; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.77), female sex (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.81), and higher systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77-0.79), whereas history of type 2 diabetes was associated with markedly higher use (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 3.15-3.28). After adjustment for patient- and practice-level characteristics, significant variation in SGLT2i use across sites was present (90th vs 10th percentile risk practice, adjusted OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 3.76-5.52).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although this study found that SGLT2i use had increased among ambulatory patients with HF during the study period, the majority of eligible patients did not receive this therapy. Older age, female sex, and higher blood pressures were associated with lower SGLT2i use with significant unexplained variation in use across practices. Systematic efforts to improve SGLT2i therapy use are warranted.

摘要

重要性

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)疗法可降低心力衰竭(HF)患者发生心力衰竭事件和心血管死亡的风险。在美国心血管门诊护理中SGLT2i的使用趋势尚不清楚。

目的

评估在心血管门诊护理环境中HF患者使用SGLT2i的比例。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,时间从2019年7月1日至2023年6月30日。纳入分析的是参加国家心血管数据注册库(NCDR)实践创新与临床卓越(PINNACLE)注册库的HF患者,该注册库是一个全国性的门诊心血管护理质量改进注册库。研究数据于2024年2月15日至2025年1月15日进行分析。

主要结局和指标

SGLT2i治疗的患者层面和医疗机构层面的处方情况。

结果

在美国191个医疗机构的759915例HF患者(平均[标准差]年龄为70[14]岁;359270例女性[47.3%];49252例黑人个体[14.6%];278303例白人个体[82.7%])中,76927例(10.1%)被处方使用SGLT2i。在有可用射血分数(EF)数据的患者中,20544例(17.9%)射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者以及36615例(8.9%)射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)或射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者被处方使用SGLT2i。所有HF患者的SGLT2i使用率从2019年第三季度的4.6%增至2023年第二季度的16.2%,HFrEF患者从5.1%增至28.5%,HFmrEF或HFpEF患者从4.5%增至12.8%(趋势P<0.001)。SGLT2i在老年人(四分位间距年龄为80岁对63岁;比值比,0.76;95%置信区间,0.75 - 0.77)、女性(比值比,0.79;95%置信区间,0.77 - 0.81)以及收缩压较高者(比值比,0.78;95%置信区间,0.77 - 0.79)中使用较少,而2型糖尿病病史与显著更高的使用率相关(比值比,3.21;95%置信区间, 3.15 - 3.28)。在对患者和医疗机构层面特征进行调整后,各医疗机构间SGLT2i的使用存在显著差异(第90百分位数风险医疗机构与第10百分位数风险医疗机构相比,调整后比值比,4.40;95%置信区间,3.76 - 5.52)。

结论与意义

尽管本研究发现研究期间门诊HF患者中SGLT2i的使用有所增加,但大多数符合条件的患者未接受该治疗。年龄较大、女性以及血压较高与SGLT2i使用较少相关,且各医疗机构间的使用存在显著的无法解释的差异。有必要系统地努力改善SGLT2i疗法的使用情况。