Suppr超能文献

一项基于2003 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的回顾性分析,探究炎症标志物与冠状动脉疾病、全因死亡率和心血管死亡率之间的关联。

A retrospective analysis from NHANES 2003-2018 on the associations between inflammatory markers and coronary artery disease, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality.

作者信息

Sun Tong, Chen Penglei, Zheng Xuwei

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Suzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Suzhou, Anhui, China.

Department of cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0326953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326953. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this research was to investigate the associations between inflammation markers and coronary artery disease (CAD), along with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality.

METHODS

This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected between 2003 and 2018. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) were calculated based on blood test results. The diagnosis of CAD was obtained from self-reported cardiovascular health questionnaires. Participants' survival status was sourced from the National Death Index (NDI) of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Logistic and Cox regression models were employed to investigate the associations between PLR, NLR, MLR, and SII with CAD, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 32,683 individuals from the 2003-2018 NHANES were involved. After adjusting for potential confounders, each 1-unit increase in log (NLR) and log (MLR) was associated with a 29% (95% CI: 1.15-1.46, P < 0.001) and 67% (95% CI: 1.40-1.99, P < 0.001) increase in the risk of CAD, respectively. Notably, when log (PLR) exceeded 4.93(PLR = 138.38) and log (SII) surpassed 6.11(SII = 450.34), the risk of CAD increased sharply (P < 0.001). Furthermore, individuals in the highest quartiles (Q4) of PLR, NLR, MLR, and SII had significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (13%, 88%, 91%, and 42%, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (48%, 194%, 139%, and 90%, respectively) compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1), with all P-values <0.001. Moreover, MLR had the highest the area under the curve (AUC) value (AUC:0.642, 95% CI: 0.629-0.654), followed by NLR (AUC:0.600, 95% CI: 0.587-0.612) for distinguishing CAD.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that PLR, NLR, MLR, and SII were associated with increased prevalence of CAD, as well as increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. These inflammatory markers may serve as valuable clinical indicators for CAD, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是调查炎症标志物与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、全因死亡率和心血管死亡率之间的关联。

方法

本研究利用了2003年至2018年期间收集的美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。根据血液检测结果计算血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)。CAD的诊断来自自我报告的心血管健康问卷。参与者的生存状况来自美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)的国家死亡指数(NDI)。采用逻辑回归和Cox回归模型来研究PLR、NLR、MLR和SII与CAD、全因死亡率和心血管死亡率之间的关联。

结果

2003 - 2018年NHANES共有32,683人参与。在调整潜在混杂因素后,log(NLR)和log(MLR)每增加1个单位,CAD风险分别增加29%(95%CI:1.15 - 1.46,P < 0.001)和67%(95%CI:1.40 - 1.99,P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,当log(PLR)超过4.93(PLR = 138.38)且log(SII)超过6.11(SII = 450.34)时,CAD风险急剧增加(P < 0.001)。此外,与最低四分位数(Q1)的个体相比,PLR、NLR、MLR和SII处于最高四分位数(Q4)的个体全因死亡率(分别为13%、88%、91%和42%)和心血管死亡率(分别为48%、194%、139%和90%)显著更高,所有P值均<0.001。此外,在区分CAD方面,MLR的曲线下面积(AUC)值最高(AUC:0.642,95%CI:0.629 - 0.654),其次是NLR(AUC:0.600,95%CI:(0.58)7 - 0.612)。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现PLR、NLR、MLR和SII与CAD患病率增加以及全因和心血管死亡率风险增加相关。这些炎症标志物可能是一般人群中CAD、全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的有价值临床指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d873/12240292/55fb9ac55985/pone.0326953.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验