Walker Tiana L, Aridi Tarek G, Iyengar Meera, Siddique Shazia Mehmood, Philpotts Lisa, Ufere Nneka N, Nephew Lauren D
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.04.032.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Given the evolving epidemiology of liver disease, escalating healthcare costs, and persistent racial health disparities, evaluating the Affordable Care Act (ACA)-the most substantial U.S. healthcare reform to date-is critical for informing future policy. We conducted a systematic review to assess the impact of the ACA and its Medicaid Expansion (ME) provision on access to care, survival, and racial and ethnic disparities among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).
We reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 that included adults with CLD and evaluated ACA/ME effects on access to services, survival or mortality, or disparities in outcomes. Studies compared ME and non-Medicaid Expansion (NME) states during pre- and post-ACA periods. Risk of bias was assessed using a validated tool.
Twenty-seven studies met inclusion criteria across 4 clinical categories: hepatitis C virus (n = 4), liver transplantation (n = 10), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 9), and cirrhosis or CLD (n = 5). Twenty-three studies reported improved outcomes associated with ACA/ME. Difference-in-difference analyses showed liver transplantation listing increased by 1.8% to 6.0% in ME vs NME states; early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis increased by 5.4%, and cirrhosis-related mortality rose more slowly in ME states (0.5-1.0 per 100,000 vs 1.4-10.4 per 100,000). Most studies were at low-to-moderate risk of bias and used causal inference methods.
The ACA, particularly ME, improved access, survival, and equity among Medicaid-eligible adults with CLD. Individuals in NME states would likely benefit from expansion, and future liver health policy should consider these findings to reduce disparities.
鉴于肝病流行病学的不断演变、医疗保健成本的不断攀升以及持续存在的种族健康差异,评估《平价医疗法案》(ACA)——美国迄今为止最重大的医疗改革——对于为未来政策提供信息至关重要。我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估ACA及其医疗补助扩大计划(ME)条款对慢性肝病(CLD)患者获得医疗服务、生存率以及种族和民族差异的影响。
我们回顾了2010年至2025年期间发表的研究,这些研究纳入了患有CLD的成年人,并评估了ACA/ME对获得服务、生存或死亡率以及结局差异的影响。研究比较了ACA实施前后ME州和非医疗补助扩大计划(NME)州的情况。使用经过验证的工具评估偏倚风险。
27项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖4个临床类别:丙型肝炎病毒(n = 4)、肝移植(n = 10)、肝细胞癌(n = 9)以及肝硬化或CLD(n = 5)。23项研究报告称ACA/ME带来了改善的结局。差异分析表明,与NME州相比,ME州的肝移植登记增加了1.8%至6.0%;早期肝细胞癌诊断增加了5.4%,ME州肝硬化相关死亡率上升更为缓慢(每10万人中0.5 - 1.0例,而NME州为每10万人中1.4 - 10.4例)。大多数研究的偏倚风险为低到中度,并使用了因果推断方法。
ACA,特别是ME,改善了符合医疗补助条件的CLD成年患者的医疗服务可及性、生存率和公平性。NME州的个人可能会从扩大计划中受益,未来的肝脏健康政策应考虑这些发现以减少差异。