Ma Shuzhen, Xue Weijia, Soh Kim Geok, Liu Huange, Xu Fan, Sun Min, Li Jing, Shi Xijie, Wang Xinzhi
College of Public Administration, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, 541000, China.
Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul 9;17(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01199-y.
Despite the abundance of common physical training programs designed for healthy badminton players, there is a significant gap in comprehensive studies evaluating their impact on player performance.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effects of common physical training programs on performance outcomes of healthy badminton players.
To address this gap, a meticulous search was conducted across several databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost, up until January 2024, leading to the selection of relevant articles for a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis using Review Manager (version 6) software.
The review incorporated 370 participants from 15 studies, with 12 studies qualifying for the meta-analysis. These studies commonly implemented exercise interventions ranging from 4 to 10 weeks, with participants undergoing 2 to 3 sessions weekly. The meta-analysis results showed that VO2max data indicated significantly improved performance in the experimental group (EG) (SMDb = 1.27; P = 0.0001; I = 0.0%) with low heterogeneity. Agility data also demonstrated significantly improved performance in the EG (SMDb = -0.61; P = 0.01; I = 13%) with low heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis of balance performance revealed significant improvements with different physical training programs: balance related training (effect size 5.63, p < 0.001, I = 35%), pilates training (effect size 2.25, p < 0.001, I = 78%), and core training (effect size 6.82, p < 0.001, I = 33%).
This review found that high-intensity interval training and sprint interval training both improve VO2max in badminton players. High-intensity interval training, core training, strength and resistance training, and Pilates all enhance agility. Core training and lower limb resistance training help improve power. Balance training, core training, Pilates, and balance enhancement exercises contribute to better balance. Additionally, balance training improves the reactive strength index, while core training enhances smash performance. The meta-analysis indicates that current studies are more effective than traditional exercises in improving VO2max, agility, and balance. Nonetheless, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to more accurately identify effective training interventions for improving performance in healthy badminton players.
尽管有大量为健康羽毛球运动员设计的常规体能训练项目，但在评估这些项目对运动员表现影响的综合研究方面仍存在显著差距。
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定常规体能训练项目对健康羽毛球运动员运动表现结果的影响。
为填补这一空白，截至2024年1月，在包括Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science和EBSCOhost在内的多个数据库中进行了细致检索，从而筛选出相关文章进行系统评价，并随后使用Review Manager（版本6）软件进行荟萃分析。
该评价纳入了15项研究中的370名参与者，其中12项研究符合荟萃分析的条件。这些研究通常实施4至10周的运动干预，参与者每周进行2至3次训练。荟萃分析结果显示，最大摄氧量数据表明实验组（EG）的表现有显著改善（标准化均数差[SMDb]=1.27；P=0.0001；异质性I=0.0%），异质性较低。敏捷性数据也表明实验组的表现有显著改善（SMDb=-0.61；P=0.01；I=13%），异质性较低。平衡能力表现的亚组分析显示，不同的体能训练项目都有显著改善：平衡相关训练（效应量5.63，p<0.001，I=35%）、普拉提训练（效应量2.25，p<0.001，I=78%）和核心训练（效应量6.82，p<0.001，I=33%）。
本评价发现，高强度间歇训练和冲刺间歇训练均能提高羽毛球运动员的最大摄氧量。高强度间歇训练、核心训练、力量和阻力训练以及普拉提都能提高敏捷性。核心训练和下肢阻力训练有助于提高力量。平衡训练、核心训练、普拉提和平衡增强练习有助于改善平衡能力。此外，平衡训练可提高反应力量指数，而核心训练可提高扣杀表现。荟萃分析表明，当前研究在改善最大摄氧量、敏捷性和平衡能力方面比传统练习更有效。尽管如此，仍需要进一步开展高质量的随机对照试验，以更准确地确定有效训练干预措施，从而提高健康羽毛球运动员的表现。
